Hermi wrote:
>
> This question boils down to asking how to force a kernel module to load
> on startup in the style of 'insmod -f'. I include the rationale for
> it, in case I am approaching this the wrong way
>
>
I solved it by installing the package 'kernel-headers-2.2.20-idepci',
and recompili
ith Debian, but this is my first Debian
installation.
I am running Debian 3.0r1 (woody) (2.2.20-idepci kernel)
The NIC comes with Linux drivers. For kernel version 2.2.* it comes as
a tulip.c file, which I managed to compile into tulip.o
I have copied tulip.o into /lib/modules/.../net/tulip.o
The
up as uato, or static, but
not both for each card.
jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jason.pepas.com
- Original Message -
From: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: tulip.o
> Thanks for reply, however, I must not have made m
Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is my problem with the Linksys NIC:
>
> . I have two NICs: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 and Intel 10/100
> . Using 2.4.3 Kernel and have tulip.o module compiled in it.
> . The Interl NIC is detected as eth0 (btw, did I compile
Thanks for reply, however, I must not have made myself clear.
> | . I have two NICs: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 and Intel 10/100
> | . Using 2.4.3 Kernel and have tulip.o module compiled in it.
> | . The Interl NIC is detected as eth0 (btw, did I compile any support
> | f
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:09:07AM -0500, Jack wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Here is my problem with the Linksys NIC:
|
| . I have two NICs: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 and Intel 10/100
| . Using 2.4.3 Kernel and have tulip.o module compiled in it.
| . The Interl NIC is detected as eth0 (btw, did I
Hi,
Here is my problem with the Linksys NIC:
. I have two NICs: Linksys EtherFast 10/100 and Intel 10/100
. Using 2.4.3 Kernel and have tulip.o module compiled in it.
. The Interl NIC is detected as eth0 (btw, did I compile any support
for that card? I dont think so. it
A: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Oggetto: Re: R: R: tulip.o kernel module
>
>
> marco frattola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Parrish M Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I built it by hand. Reason being I shouldn't have to recompile the
> >>
Parrish M Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I built it by hand. Reason being I shouldn't have to recompile the
> entire kernel to add one module. So I tried it that way. I downloaded
> the 2.2.14 kernel-source and messed arround with the compile command
> for a while and found that the sugeste
Makefiles are there to help
you, and if you use them your life will become a lot easier. The fact
that gcc didn't return any errors doesn't necessarily mean that it was
doing what you thought it was doing (the object file you produced
probably needed to be linked against something else). Try c
> A: marco frattola
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Oggetto: Re: R: tulip.o kernel module
>
>
> I built it by hand. Reason being I shouldn't have to recompile the
> entire kernel to add one module. So I tried it that way. I
> downloaded
> the 2.2.14 kernel-so
gt; > command returns
> >
> > depmod: ***Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.14/net tulip.o
> >
> > and if I run a 'insmod tulip' instead or after I get a screen full
> of
> > unmet dependencies. Anyone have ideas?
> >
> > Thanks
&
een able to compile and use the tulip.c file that comes
> with the Netgear FA-310TX card?
>
> I finally got the module compiled but when I run 'depmod -a' the
> command returns
>
> depmod: ***Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.14/net tulip.o
>
> and if I run a
ompiled but when I run 'depmod -a' the
> command returns
>
> depmod: ***Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.14/net tulip.o
>
> and if I run a 'insmod tulip' instead or after I get a screen full of
> unmet
Hi all,
Has anyone been able to compile and use the tulip.c file that comes
with the Netgear FA-310TX card?
I finally got the module compiled but when I run 'depmod -a' the
command returns
depmod: ***Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.14/net tulip.o
and if I run a 'insmod
15 matches
Mail list logo
