[linux.debian.user] problem with t tulip cards in one box

I am attempting to upgrade my old redhat 7.3 gateway to debian and am running into a problem with the backup gateway I am trying to install in the interim. I have a box with 2 cards that both use the tulip driver. One is a lite-on pnic-II and the other is a ADMtek comet according to /var/log

Re: 2.6.6 ignores tulip (DC21041)

eceived interrupts. | | Thoughts? Does that machine have any ISA cards? Maybe there is a conflict somewhere, or maybe you can tell the card to use a different IRQ. (ISTR setting the two tulip NICs I used to have to different IRQs with kernel 2.4; I did it solely for performance) On an old (IS

Re: 2.6.6 ignores tulip (DC21041)

On Monday 14 June 2004 11:38 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm stumped on this one. I've been playing around for a while with > 2.6.6 on AMD (x86), trying to get it to recognise my DEC 21041 > (tulip) PCI network card. FWIW, 2.4.25 and earlier all work fine with > it.

Re: 2.6.6 ignores tulip (DC21041)

On Monday 14 June 2004 11:38 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm stumped on this one. I've been playing around for a while with > 2.6.6 on AMD (x86), trying to get it to recognise my DEC 21041 > (tulip) PCI network card. FWIW, 2.4.25 and earlier all work fine with > it. >

2.6.6 ignores tulip (DC21041)

I'm stumped on this one. I've been playing around for a while with 2.6.6 on AMD (x86), trying to get it to recognise my DEC 21041 (tulip) PCI network card. FWIW, 2.4.25 and earlier all work fine with it. I've googled (web and news), and generally had a look around but cannot

Re: Advice on tulip driver

On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 10:28:24PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > The current distribution has four tulip drivers named tulip, > > old_tulip, ng_tulip, and tulip_scyld. Can anyone provid

Re: Advice on tulip driver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The current distribution has four tulip drivers named tulip, > old_tulip, ng_tulip, and tulip_scyld. Can anyone provide > information on the differences that characterize these drivers? 1. RTFM. The Lin

Advice on tulip driver

The current distribution has four tulip drivers named tulip, old_tulip, ng_tulip, and tulip_scyld. Can anyone provide information on the differences that characterize these drivers? > Content-Type: text/plain > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2004 :

Re: Another question regarding tulip driver with 2.4 kernel

When install kernel-image-2.6.*, apt don't make initrd.img automatically,you should usr mkinitrd to build a initrd.img, and edit your lilo.conf if you use lilo, or run 'update-grub' if you use grub -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: Another question regarding tulip driver with 2.4 kernel

Brian Walker wrote: Kent West wrote: [initrd.img] should be in /boot. It should have been installed automatically. Indeed it is - many thank for the reference. But ls -l shows that there is no symlink to the initrd.img. Should there be one? This is where the apt-get called a problem, and see

Re: Another question regarding tulip driver with 2.4 kernel

for the tulip driver is built-into the standard 2.4 kernels. So, just "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.24-686" (or whatever kernel version you want -- "apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4" will show you a list of available versions). After the reboot into the new kernel, y

Re: Another question regarding tulip driver with 2.4 kernel

Brian Walker wrote: Kent West wrote: Compiling a kernel is a great thing to do if you want the education, or if you have some esoteric need to do so, but for 90%+ of the population out there, the standard Debian kernels will do just fine. That should be the case here; support for the tulip

Re: Another question regarding tulip driver with 2.4 kernel

Kent West wrote: Robert Packer wrote: I am a complete newbie to this and don't have a clue how to compile a kernel(I'm reading up, but still...), so is it possible to make the 2.4 kernel work with a nic card that needs a tulip driver? It works fine with the 2.2.20 kernel but if possibl

Re: Another question regarding tulip driver with 2.4 kernel

Robert Packer wrote: I am a complete newbie to this and don't have a clue how to compile a kernel(I'm reading up, but still...), so is it possible to make the 2.4 kernel work with a nic card that needs a tulip driver? It works fine with the 2.2.20 kernel but if possible I'd like to

Another question regarding tulip driver with 2.4 kernel

I am a complete newbie to this and don't have a clue how to compile a kernel(I'm reading up, but still...), so is it possible to make the 2.4 kernel work with a nic card that needs a tulip driver? It works fine with the 2.2.20 kernel but if possible I'd like to use the latest kerne

Re: tulip

address on two fronts First > > i have fjound that i have a linksys pci nic which means i have the > > tulip driver :-( A how can i install this with minimal fuss because > > the second half is that i am learning disabled thus install software > > and driver can somet

Re: tulip

Kent West wrote: > edit "/etc/modules" and add the single line: > tulip > > Reboot (not strictly necessary, but easy to do to accomplish what needs > to be done). Since you are adding new hardware it is okay to reboot. :-) But alternatively just load the modul

Re: tulip

paul valley wrote: Hi all: I will be leaving M$ :-[ behind soon and installing debian :-) :-) :-) however theres a problem i need to address on two fronts First i have fjound that i have a linksys pci nic which means i have the tulip driver :-( A how can i install this with minimal fuss

tulip

Hi all: I will be leaving M$ :-[ behind soon and installing debian :-) :-) :-) however theres a problem i need to address on two fronts First i have fjound that i have a linksys pci nic which means i have the tulip driver :-( A how can i install this with minimal fuss because the second half

Re: Including tulip drivers in a new kernel

river or the IP config) >The device appears as eth1 now; it didn't before I installed it >(there's two ethernet cards) Well then I guess the line below should end in m This would mean it is compiled in as a module. I don't have module support compiled into my kernel, but I b

Re: Including tulip drivers in a new kernel

* Steven Schlansker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030725 12:45]: > > I compiled a new kernel for a PC, but in doing so I lost the tulip > drivers for an ethernet card. How do I get them back? One of the > ethernet cards in the system needs it (the other works fine) Lost? Do you

Re: Including tulip drivers in a new kernel

's two ethernet cards) On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 07:38 PM, Shawn Lamson wrote: On Thu, July 24 at 3:08 PM EDT Steven Schlansker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I compiled a new kernel for a PC, but in doing so I lost the tulip drivers for an ethernet card. How do I get them back? One

Including tulip drivers in a new kernel

I compiled a new kernel for a PC, but in doing so I lost the tulip drivers for an ethernet card.  How do I get them back?  One of the ethernet cards in the system needs it (the other works fine)

Re: Fwd: Re: fun with tulip not autoloading

Kieren Diment wrote: From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: Re: fun with tulip not autoloading Kieren Diment wrote: From: Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: fun with tulip not autoloading i'm using 00:10.0 Et

Re: Fwd: Re: fun with tulip not autoloading

Kieren Diment wrote: From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: Re: fun with tulip not autoloading Kieren Diment wrote: From: Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: fun with tulip not autoloading i'm using 00:10.0 Et

Fwd: Re: fun with tulip not autoloading

From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: Re: fun with tulip not autoloading Kieren Diment wrote: >>From: Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Newsgroups: linux.debian.user >>Subject: fun with tulip not autoloading >> >>i'

Re: fun with tulip not autoloading

Kieren Diment wrote: From: Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: fun with tulip not autoloading i'm using 00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 21) and for some reason the tulip module that runs it wont load by default. I cam

Re: fun with tulip not autoloading

From: Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: linux.debian.user Subject: fun with tulip not autoloading i'm using 00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 21) and for some reason the tulip module that runs it wont load by default. I came up with a really ug

Re: fun with tulip not autoloading

Ray wrote: i'm using 00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 21) and for some reason the tulip module that runs it wont load by default. durning the base install (via network) i didn't find it in the list of drivers to add, so just to try something, i dr

Re: fun with tulip not autoloading

On 23 January 2003 at 17:26, Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can anyone dirrect me to what i need to change to fix it? Use modconf instead of modprobe. It will install the modules and make sure that the modules.conf (or whatever file it is now) gets updated so that the modules is loaded on th

fun with tulip not autoloading

i'm using 00:10.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 21) and for some reason the tulip module that runs it wont load by default. durning the base install (via network) i didn't find it in the list of drivers to add, so just to try something, i dropped into a

Re: Tulip driver bundled with Woody 3.0_r0 Fails dhcp

hey, just another idea for ya, have you tried using the bf24 series boot floppies? they're based on a different kernel alltogether. sean msg18559/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Tulip driver bundled with Woody 3.0_r0 Fails dhcp

, otherwise i spose i could just install woody w/o network support, and burn a copy of the latest kernel on cd, mount it and upgrade the kernel and hope that works. Just think its odd that this is the only time ive ever had problems with the tulip driver. --- Todd Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &g

Re: Tulip driver bundled with Woody 3.0_r0 Fails dhcp

dudahhh said: > Secondly, when i ran potato, i always updated the > kernel to 2.4.18, and ive never had any problems. > > So, ive determined theres just something wrong with > that tulip driver with woody, i do see there is an > updated one at ftp://ftp.scyld.com/pub/network/tul

Tulip driver bundled with Woody 3.0_r0 Fails dhcp

have a LNE100TX Linksys card, which states uses the Tulip driver, and it has used it on potato, and also when ive played with rh, slack, and mandrake After searching around i found out the tulip version from potato is to be tulip.c:v0.89K.1 3/16/99, and that woody comes bundeled with 0.9.15 Is there

Re: tulip

Jule Slootbeek wrote: now my question is: how do i set this IRQ parameter since i know for a fact it is 12 on my system > On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 02:41 AM, Jan Johansson wrote: You never pass IRQ to a tulip board (you should never ened to pass IRQ to a PCI board at all). Someth

Re: tulip

Ok, so i'm not sure what to do, it gave the same error when i was installing the modules during set-up..(i'm trying Sid on a second box) and w/out a network card i'm kinda limited to what to do) So i might have to recompile the kernel w/ tulip support, but the tulip.o file

RE: tulip

> now my question is: how do i set this IRQ parameter since i > know for a > fact it is 12 on my system You never pass IRQ to a tulip board (you should never ened to pass IRQ to a PCI board at all). Something else must be wrong. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

tulip

Hey guys, i'm trying to install a tulip network card, and whenever i run modprobe tulip i get this error message: intit_module: Device or resource busy Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. now my question is: how do

Re: Connectix Virtual PC and the Tulip driver.

running Virtual PC under MacOS 9. My Debian install under that uses the same Tulip driver with the same chipset. However, it is showing up as PCI based (Not ISA PNP, which it sounds like you are). The driver autodetects it as IRQ 11, and it works fine. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Li

Connectix Virtual PC and the Tulip driver.

Hello I am trying to run Potato on my Win98se machine using Connectix Virtual PC and everything is working even X with one major exception. My network connection is not.   Virtual PC uses emulated hardware. s3 trio 32/64 4m video sb16 sound DEC 21041 network card (supposedly at IRQ 1 but con

Re: tulip driver woes ....

It's good to know I'm not alone!! My tulip card was working fine until I make a kernel update. Then it stopped working, but I was getting help from this mailing list until I had to send my PC to warranty. Have you tried to install or reconfigure the "dhcp-client" pac

Re: tulip driver woes ....

On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:04:06PM -0800, Kapil Khosla wrote: | Hi, | I have a DEC 21145 which uses a tulip driver, I do install via the | net and am having problems with the driver/card. | | When I configure the driver modules, it says INSTALLATION SUCCEEDED | , but when I configure the network

tulip driver woes ....

Hi, I have a DEC 21145 which uses a tulip driver, I do install via the net and am having problems with the driver/card. When I configure the driver modules, it says INSTALLATION SUCCEEDED , but when I configure the network, it fails to detect my DHCP connection. DO you know how to solve the

Re: Tulip not installing

It would appear that the conflict has not been resolved in Woody either. I suppose I have two choices: 1. Get down and dirty, and spend lots of time compiling this crapping tulip driver myself 2. Install RedHat I really hate both choices :-( (==timothy

Re: Tulip not installing

On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 11:58:57PM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote: > 2.2r5 Potato Installation: > > After configuring PCMCIA support and seeing > the lights activate on my Netgear FA511 card, > I tried to install the Tulip module via the > "net modules" screen. Th

Tulip not installing

2.2r5 Potato Installation: After configuring PCMCIA support and seeing the lights activate on my Netgear FA511 card, I tried to install the Tulip module via the "net modules" screen. These are the errors which I received: -- /lib/modules/2.2.19/net/tulip.o: init_module: Device or res

Re: Problem with TULIP

Hi, You might want to try downloading a newer version of the driver at Elizabeth

Problem with TULIP

Hi, I have a DLINK DFE 500TX REV-C2 network card which uses the tulip driver. I have installed Potato 2.2.19pre17 but am not able to configure the network, It failed to detect my DHCP while installing and I had to install Debian using CD's. When I give dmesg I get the following message for

tulip?

I have a 32-bit Netgear FA511 card and I cannot get the tulip module to install. I am in the installation program for potato, 2.2r5. The PCMICIA *appears* to be working because the card is lit. I set the PCMCIA to use the i82365 Intel-compatible controller. I didn't specify any

Re: ARRGH!!! Tulip card again

Dunno if this is relevant or not, but here goes. I have a Tulip card too, the Linksys Network-Everywhere NC100 card. I got mine to work by making a 2.4.5 kernel with support for anything with "DecCHIP" listed in "Network" and "network devices", and by Enabling

Re: ARRGH!!! Tulip card again

On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:01:41PM -0800, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 13:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > HELP! > > > > This is driving me absolutely positively mad. > > > > I have a Netgear F? 310TX network card, which is a PNIC 82c168 (tuli

Re: ARRGH!!! Tulip card again

On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 13:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > HELP! > > This is driving me absolutely positively mad. > > I have a Netgear F? 310TX network card, which is a PNIC 82c168 (tulip clone). > > I *cannot* get this card to run reliably on the latest Debian stable >

Re: ARRGH!!! Tulip card again

On Wednesday 14 November 2001 16:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > HELP! > > This is driving me absolutely positively mad. > > I have a Netgear F? 310TX network card, which is a PNIC 82c168 (tulip > clone). > > I *cannot* get this card to run reliably on the latest Debian st

ARRGH!!! Tulip card again

HELP! This is driving me absolutely positively mad. I have a Netgear F? 310TX network card, which is a PNIC 82c168 (tulip clone). I *cannot* get this card to run reliably on the latest Debian stable (2.2.Rev4). I have used both the tulip.o and the old_tulip.o drivers. The old_tulip.o module

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

Isnt there a patch that fixes this? I think the problem is the version of the tulip driver that the 2.2.19 kernel has and you have to update the driver to use the newer tulip based cards

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a pair of Netgear FX-310TX NICs. (I'm uncertain of the precise model > card running the PNIC chip (marked LC82C169), which is a Tulip compatible. > installation isn't. This is undoubtedly a silly thing. What am I doing

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

gt; number; neither card has a model stenciled on the card.) The cards came in > one > of those networking kits; the price was right so I bought it. The card is a > PCI > card running the PNIC chip (marked LC82C169), which is a Tulip compatible. > > On a brand spanking new Debi

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

st need to know what to do to get them to work > >with Debian 2.2Rev4 Potato. > > > >They are already working fine with the 2.2.13 version of Linux (and were > >working as far back as 2.0.38, again using the standard tulip driver.) > > Have you tried the old_tul

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

to work >with Debian 2.2Rev4 Potato. > >They are already working fine with the 2.2.13 version of Linux (and were >working as far back as 2.0.38, again using the standard tulip driver.) Have you tried the old_tulip-driver? I remember having to do something to that effect when swi

Natsemi [was Re: Tulip chip Netgear card]

ngs. > > I have a pair of Netgear FX-310TX NICs. (I'm uncertain of the > > precise model > > number; neither card has a model stenciled on the card.) The cards came in > > one > > of those networking kits; the price was right so I bought it. The card is a >

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 06:37:22PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > These are *not* new NICs, I've had them for a few years now. I am nearly > certain that they are 310s. As I said, both will run on SuSE 6.3 using the > standard tulip.c driver. I just need to know what to do to get them to work

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

t to do to get them to work > with Debian 2.2Rev4 Potato. > > They are already working fine with the 2.2.13 version of Linux (and were > working as far back as 2.0.38, again using the standard tulip driver.) > > Switching them out is not an option. There's nothing wrong wit

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

h the 2.2.13 version of Linux (and were working as far back as 2.0.38, again using the standard tulip driver.) Switching them out is not an option. There's nothing wrong with the cards. But I'm dead in the water until I get them working in Debian. Tom Allison wrote: > Interestingly en

Re: Tulip chip Netgear card

card has a model stenciled on the card.) The cards came in one of those networking kits; the price was right so I bought it. The card is a PCI card running the PNIC chip (marked LC82C169), which is a Tulip compatible. Interestingly enough I just talked to someone this morning who was using these n

Tulip chip Netgear card

n the card.) The cards came in one of those networking kits; the price was right so I bought it. The card is a PCI card running the PNIC chip (marked LC82C169), which is a Tulip compatible. On a brand spanking new Debian 2.2Rev4 install, this card refuses to function. I get the following from the tu

Force mediatype with tulip

Hi folks, I got a ethercard with a DECchip 21140. I am using kernel 2.4.8, tulip driver 0.9.15-pre6 (July 2, 2001). As my linux-box is connected to a 10/100Mbps dual-speed hub/switch (namely D-Link DFE-905DX) and the "10M" indicator is active, I want to force media-type to 100baseTx.

Re: Sources for tulip

Thanks a lot! I'll check that out! On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Greg Wiley wrote: > On: Monday, October 08, 2001 1:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > But there is nothing in the /usr/src directory since I installed from the > > net, and I guess I didn't install any sources... > > > Coan someone tell me

Re: Sources for tulip

On: Monday, October 08, 2001 1:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But there is nothing in the /usr/src directory since I installed from the > net, and I guess I didn't install any sources... > Coan someone tell me what I need to apt-get apt-get install kernel-source- Where is the, well, versio

Sources for tulip

Hello there... My laptop needs a modifyed version of tulip... I found it in www.linuxlaptop.net its tulip_core.c I'm supposed to copy it to /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/tulip and recompile the module (tulip.o) But there is nothing in the /usr/src directory since I installed from the net,

Re: Tulip driver unresolved symbols (UPDATE)

your driver is probably ng_tulip > rather than > tulip. > > Information is not knowledge. Belief is > not truth. > Indoctrination is not teaching. Tradition is not > evidence. >

Re: Tulip driver unresolved symbols (UPDATE)

Just in case my former got lost in the sauce, if you have a netgear card, your driver is probably ng_tulip rather than tulip. Information is not knowledge. Belief is not truth. Indoctrination is not teaching. Tradition is not

Re: Tulip driver unresolved symbols (UPDATE)

Guess what? If you have a netgear card, you probably want a ng_tulip driver instead of a tulip driver. I just found this out when I compiled a new kernel. Don't be mad, I didn't know either. :-) -- ||/ Peace, understanding, health and happiness to all beings! || |-K ars sine scie

Re: Tulip driver unresolved symbols (UPDATE)

those and still nothing. At this point I was really frustrated and figured I'd go about this from a different perspective. I installed a Distro (Mandrake 8.0) that I knew that the tulip driver worked in and was going to try and load Debian, but leave the pcmcia stuff.. I'm not sure if I can

Re: Tulip driver unresolved symbols

I did a lsmod and it was not listed so I assumed that it was not installed... So I did not set it up. I'll chceck it out. --- David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get tons every time I boot up, but it works fine. > Does yours work? > > -

Re: Tulip driver unresolved symbols

I get tons every time I boot up, but it works fine. Does yours work? Information is not knowledge. Belief is not truth. Indoctrination is not teaching. Tradition is not evidence. David Raleigh Arnold [EMAIL PROTE

Tulip driver unresolved symbols

Hi all I have installed Potato 2.2.r2 on my HP Pavilion N5450 Laptop and this system uses a Accton en2242 nic card that uses the tulip driver. I know that I've seen this discussed on this list but I am unable to find it. I have downloaded the drivers for the card and did a cp pci-s

tulip and kernel 2.4.4-more info

Hi again, Here is the specific information taken from dmesg and modprobe from both kernel 2.2.18 and 2.4.2. This is the error message I get when I try to load the tulip driver manually for kernel 2.4.2: satchel[/home/jake]% modprobe tulip /lib/modules/2.4.2/kernel/drivers/net/tulip/tulip.o

Re: tulip and kernel 2.4.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > I recently compiled kernel 2.4.2 and am having a difficult time getting > the tulip driver module to load. The module loads fine using kernel > 2.2.18 (from /etc/modules) withou

Re: tulip and kernel 2.4.2

[47] Linux diamond 2.4.2 #1 Thu Feb 22 16:47:47 EST 2001 i586 unknown diamond:~# lsmod | grep tulip [48] tulip 31864 1 (autoclean) diamond:~# grep eth0 /proc/ioports [49]

Re: tulip and kernel 2.4.2

that's news to me... It's done that for about as long as I can remember. At least a couple years. > > > When I type modprobe tulip io=0x7000 irq=10 it says that this is an > > invalid io_parm. > > besides 0x7000 is clearly out of range. i would argue that your >

Re: tulip and kernel 2.4.2

also sprach Jacob Stowell (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 11:52:25PM -0500): > I checked ifconfig and it told me that my ethernet card has a base > address: > 0x7000 and an interrupt of 10. ifconfig tells you what? i/o addresses? that's news to me... > When I type modprobe tulip io=0x70

tulip and kernel 2.4.2

Hi, I recently compiled kernel 2.4.2 and am having a difficult time getting the tulip driver module to load. The module loads fine using kernel 2.2.18 (from /etc/modules) without passing any parameter arguments. However, even when I try to load the module using irq and io values, it fails to

Re: Problems with tulip driver

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: >james, the tulip driver is problematic. > >we've had cards at our installfests that required the tulip.c driver from >the 2.4.* kernels. Also look at Donald Becker's company's site (Becker wrote most of the linux

Re: Problems with tulip driver

> > yes, the most commonly used pci drivers are the 3com vortex/boomerang, > the dec tulip and the intel etherexpress pro 100. > > the problem is that there's a register on these cards, the general purpose > register (CSR12) which are programmable by the vendor. they all do

Re: Problems with tulip driver

also sprach Peter Jay Salzman (on Sun, 25 Feb 2001 07:02:06PM -0800): > as far as debian goes, i can understand your frustration. however, i'll > tell you this much. i've used redhat, suse and debian extensively. when it > comes to: > > updating your system > recovering from a Reall

Re: Problems with tulip driver

hi james, yes, the most commonly used pci drivers are the 3com vortex/boomerang, the dec tulip and the intel etherexpress pro 100. the problem is that there's a register on these cards, the general purpose register (CSR12) which are programmable by the vendor. they all do it a bit differ

Re: Problems with tulip driver

as86 is part of package bin86 Pascal [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sunday 25 February 2001 20:40, James K. Wiggs wrote: > Peter, > >Thanks for the info. I find it sort of astonishing that there > are problems with the tulip driver. This has to be probably the > most commonly used dr

Re: Problems with tulip driver

Peter, Thanks for the info. I find it sort of astonishing that there are problems with the tulip driver. This has to be probably the most commonly used driver other than the ne2k. I've been using these NetGear cards in most of my boxes for about three years and never had *any* pro

Re: Problems with tulip driver

Nope, it's a PCI card. It's getting configured at IRQ 9, and looking at /proc/pci and /proc/interrupts it's clear there are no IRQ conflicts. On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, MaD dUCK wrote: > it doesn't happen to be an ISA card, does it? i.e. do you have to > worry about IRQ's ? if so, you need to comp

Re: Problems with tulip driver

also sprach Peter Jay Salzman (on Sun, 25 Feb 2001 05:49:01PM -0800): > On Sun 25 Feb 01, 8:43 PM, MaD dUCK said: > > it doesn't happen to be an ISA card, does it? i.e. do you have to > > worry about IRQ's ? if so, you need to compile a module > huh?? why?? > why not pass a kernel argument to s

Re: Problems with tulip driver

On Sun 25 Feb 01, 8:43 PM, MaD dUCK said: > it doesn't happen to be an ISA card, does it? i.e. do you have to > worry about IRQ's ? if so, you need to compile a module huh?? why?? why not pass a kernel argument to set up the IRQ? you can do that with the append directive with lilo. > or hac

Re: Problems with tulip driver

it doesn't happen to be an ISA card, does it? i.e. do you have to worry about IRQ's ? if so, you need to compile a module or hack the kernel sources. martin [greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@@.net -- windows nt crashed. i am the blue screen of de

Re: Problems with tulip driver

james, the tulip driver is problematic. we've had cards at our installfests that required the tulip.c driver from the 2.4.* kernels. can you ping the card's IP? what does /var/log/messages say? why don't you recompile the kernel and turn off Lite-On 82c168 PNIC. compile it

Problems with tulip driver

Folks, I'm finding it impossible to get networking functional on the box I've just installed 2.2r2 on. This is not an exotic setup, and I've successfully installed several other distros on it at one time or another, but the Debian install has been a complete wash. Why does my NetGear FA-

Re: kernel and tulip??

> Chris Parker wrote: > > O.k. I just installed kernel 2.2.18 that was a .deb on a 2.2.12 > system. How to get this kernel to start over the 2.2.12. Tried to > make boot disk for it but i got fd0 errorsabout bad block sectors. > Need new floppies?? It's on a dual boot w

Re: kernel and tulip??

gt;Need new floppies?? It's on a dual boot with w98:( . Also tulip will >only run in half duplex .I tried to add a line to /etc.modules like i >was told but it still runs in half when checked with tulip-diag. >Would I be better off getting the lastest driver and where to

kernel and tulip??

O.k. I just installed kernel 2.2.18 that was a .deb on a 2.2.12 system.  How to get this kernel to start over the 2.2.12.  Tried to make boot disk for it but i got fd0 errorsabout bad block sectors.  Need new floppies??  It's on a dual boot with w98:( .  Also tulip will only run in

Re: smp-debian, tulip

"Installing Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 For (sic) Intel x86...etc" Ch8 sec 8.5. I did it. Use menuconfig. I must have screwed up somewhere though, because my tulip driver for FA3/TX doesn't load. -- daveA (debian.user)

Re: Install help needed/New tulip drivers

... I doubt it. I needed the latest tulip drivers myself for a linksys NIC, and I had to go get them. There's two modules now, the pci-scan module, and the tulip module. I have the sourcecode that I used, and it worked under 2.2.12. It's running my gateway/firewall right now, but I

  1   2   >