Thank you.
On 29/9/22 13:37, John Verhoeven wrote:
On Thursday, 29 September 2022 10:48:43 AM AWST Jiri Kanicky wrote:
I updated debian sid recently and the process is being killed after a
half of a day.
Sep 26 04:33:33 server kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 16702
(transmission-da
On Thursday, 29 September 2022 10:48:43 AM AWST Jiri Kanicky wrote:
> I updated debian sid recently and the process is being killed after a
> half of a day.
>
> Sep 26 04:33:33 server kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 16702
> (transmission-da) total-vm:4933944kB, anon-rss:3566
I updated debian sid recently and the process is being killed after a
half of a day.
Sep 26 04:33:33 server kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 16702
(transmission-da) total-vm:4933944kB, anon-rss:3566896kB, file-rss:0kB,
shmem-rss:0kB, UID:133 pgtables:7928kB oom_score_adj:0d
Any ideas?
On 22/05/22 at 03:30, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> On 21/05/22 at 04:09, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> > Nowadays, email recipients had give me feedback that attached files that
> > I sent was corrupted. I use Mutt + msmtp + offlineimap and OAuth GMail
> > app implementation.
>
> After more tests, I found that i
On 21/05/22 at 04:09, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> Nowadays, email recipients had give me feedback that attached files that
> I sent was corrupted. I use Mutt + msmtp + offlineimap and OAuth GMail
> app implementation.
After more tests, I found that if I use the mutt native smtp, attach is
properly trans
On Sun 22 May 2022 at 09:15:22 (-0300), Marcelo Laia wrote:
> On 21/05/22 at 04:09, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> > Nowadays, email recipients had give me feedback that attached files that
> > I sent was corrupted. I use Mutt + msmtp + offlineimap and OAuth GMail
> > app implementation.
> >
>
> After a l
On 21/05/22 at 04:09, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> Nowadays, email recipients had give me feedback that attached files that
> I sent was corrupted. I use Mutt + msmtp + offlineimap and OAuth GMail
> app implementation.
>
After a lot of tests, I found:
1. Files with image/figure was damaged
2. If image
Nowadays, email recipients had give me feedback that attached files that
I sent was corrupted. I use Mutt + msmtp + offlineimap and OAuth GMail
app implementation.
Here is headers I got from e...@xxx..xx:
From: Marcelo
To: echo
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 12:35:49 -0300
Subject: Test 7
[--
Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> I've suspected as much, since other online videos play just fine. Cisco
> does say that Debian 8 or later is supported (and I have 9) with Firefox
> 48 or later (I have 68).
I would look at DRI and Firefox or as suggested above at the compression or
all of them
orted (and I have 9) with Firefox 48 or
later (I have 68).
Thanks.
From: Stefan Monnier
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 5:11 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problem with slow network transmission
> What I have been trying a lot is Webex teleconferencing for my j
> What I have been trying a lot is Webex teleconferencing for my job. Those
> all work great, including voice and slideshows, but seem to crash miserably
> (including a loss of sound) if even a single attendant puts up live webcam
> video. Very large conferences that disallow that work fine. We'
Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> The disk is a WD5001AALS-00L3B2 from 2009, described as SATA 3Gbps. I
> guess that is pretty slow. We've definitely tried some best-case
> situations, where no one else is running any CPU hogs.
>
Always copy to /dev/null to ignore such things
But for video co
speedtest.net). Tomorrow I'll have my first Webex conference since I added
the 1Gbps NIC and maxed out memory. We'll see what happens.
From: deloptes
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 1:16 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problem w
Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> What I have been trying a lot is Webex teleconferencing for my job. Those
> all work great, including voice and slideshows, but seem to crash
> miserably (including a loss of sound) if even a single attendant puts up
> live webcam video. Very large conferences
__
From: Andrei POPESCU
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 1:51 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problem with slow network transmission
On Lu, 25 mai 20, 17:02:58, Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> My network transmission rate seems much slower than it should be. My deskto
On Lu, 25 mai 20, 17:02:58, Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> My network transmission rate seems much slower than it should be. My desktop
> runs Stretch (v9, oldstable) on a Pentium 4 (3 GHz) with 4GB of RAM (the
> maximum) and a 1Gbps network interface card (NIC). We pay for fi
My network transmission rate seems much slower than it should be. My desktop
runs Stretch (v9, oldstable) on a Pentium 4 (3 GHz) with 4GB of RAM (the
maximum) and a 1Gbps network interface card (NIC). We pay for fiber optic
service at 500Mbps. The specifications for my router (ZyXEL VMG4381
Vas Vas wrote:
> I recently upgraded to testing, and certain applications take an excessive
> amount of time to start. So far I've experienced it with firefox-esr,
> gnome-terminal, nautilus, and transmission-gtk, and it ranges from 20 to 90
> seconds of delay beyond what&
I recently upgraded to testing, and certain applications take an excessive
amount of time to start. So far I've experienced it with firefox-esr,
gnome-terminal, nautilus, and transmission-gtk, and it ranges from 20 to 90
seconds of delay beyond what's normal.
Once one of those ap
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Jan Bakuwel wrote:
> On 23/10/16 02:40, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > The AP would have to switch to standard beaconning while *any* station
> > is associated, otherwise it could have nefarious effects on network
> > performance.
>
> Just out of curiosity why is that?
Hi Henrique,
On 23/10/16 02:40, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Jan Bakuwel wrote:
>> Does anyone know if it's possible to disable passive mode on an AP? It
>> is possible to set the SSID to hidden but this does not stop the
>> broadcasts, it just broadcasts frames with a
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> AP beacon). It is also likely forbidden in any channels where DSS
> (weather radar detection) must be performed, as this is only performed
> by APs.
Make that DFS. Sorry for the typo.
--
Henrique Holschuh
Jan Bakuwel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As far as I'm aware, IEEE802.11 defines the two modes a wifi AP and
> client can establish communication, passive (AP broadcasts SSID, clients
> connects to SSID) and active (AP doesn't broadcast SSID, client
> broadcasts SSID probe and AP then sends a probe respons
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Jan Bakuwel wrote:
> Does anyone know if it's possible to disable passive mode on an AP? It
> is possible to set the SSID to hidden but this does not stop the
> broadcasts, it just broadcasts frames with a null SSID. Stopping the
> broadcasts altogether (and as a consequence th
Hi all,
As far as I'm aware, IEEE802.11 defines the two modes a wifi AP and
client can establish communication, passive (AP broadcasts SSID, clients
connects to SSID) and active (AP doesn't broadcast SSID, client
broadcasts SSID probe and AP then sends a probe response).
Does anyone know if it's
On Du, 08 dec 13, 23:23:36, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> Any idea what ought be my expectation for a normal trickle-down of
> this into debian-stable (ie, just by waiting for the devs)?
Since this is a minor issue the chances are very small. Even if the
version in stable has a serious bug or a sec
On 12/8/13, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 08 dec 13, 22:09:49, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> When I log in to my transmission-daemon web page, the status of each
>> download looks something like this:
>>
>> Downloading from 1 of 15 peers - ↓ 377 kB/s ↑ 0 kB/s
>>
On Du, 08 dec 13, 22:09:49, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Started downloading wikipedia-en for full offline (icluding images,
> ~100GiB), as seen on slashdot recently (and see the homepage
> http://xowa.sourceforge.net/), and using transmission-daemon
> bittorrent client to download
Started downloading wikipedia-en for full offline (icluding images,
~100GiB), as seen on slashdot recently (and see the homepage
http://xowa.sourceforge.net/), and using transmission-daemon
bittorrent client to download the torrents.
When I log in to my transmission-daemon web page, the status of
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:52:20PM +0100, Tomas Volka wrote:
> On So 04-02-12 | 17:02, cletusjenkins wrote:
>
> > Is there any problems in general with bittorrent lately? I tried to
> > launch transmission yesterday and this evening and had issues. I see no
> > traffic
On So 04-02-12 | 17:02, cletusjenkins wrote:
> Is there any problems in general with bittorrent lately? I tried to
> launch transmission yesterday and this evening and had issues. I see no
> traffic up or down, and when it starts up all my torrents are paused,
> even the ones I&#x
cletusjenkins wrote:
> Is there any problems in general with bittorrent lately? I tried to
> launch transmission yesterday and this evening and had issues. I see
> no traffic up or down, and when it starts up all my torrents are
> paused, even the ones I'm just seedin
On 05/02/12 12:02, cletusjenkins wrote:
> Is there any problems in general with bittorrent lately? I tried to
> launch transmission yesterday and this evening and had issues. I see
> no traffic up or down, and when it starts up all my torrents are
> paused, even the ones I'm just
Is there any problems in general with bittorrent lately? I tried to launch
transmission yesterday and this evening and had issues. I see no traffic up or
down, and when it starts up all my torrents are paused, even the ones I'm just
seeding. I "start" them and I check later a
"switch-user-without-logging-out" feature.
AFAIK if all those users configure their Transmission to use the same
ports, only the first Transmission will run, the other ones will fail
at startup.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dne, 22. 10. 2009 20:04:03 je H.S. napisal(a):
>
> What exact model is your router? I might be possible to load an open
> source firmware(dd-wrt, openwrt, tomato(?), etc.) on it where this
> port
> forwarding limitation is not there. This would be, IMHO, the best
> solution.
Unfortunately, my ro
Dne, 22. 10. 2009 19:23:09 je Eduardo M KALINOWSKI napisal(a):
> It would not be a mess: the first instance will be able to listen in
> the
> port, the others will fail when they try to listen to a port that is
> already used.
>
Thanx. That was speedy, exhaustive and to-the point.
--
Regards,
Klistvud wrote:
> Howdie, fellow Debianites!
>
> Now, this may be a silly question to ask, but anyway...
> My home router is running out of redirectable ports, so I was
> wondering: what would happen if I just configured the default
> Transmission ports in the router and then
Klistvud wrote:
> Howdie, fellow Debianites!
>
> Now, this may be a silly question to ask, but anyway...
> My home router is running out of redirectable ports, so I was
> wondering: what would happen if I just configured the default
> Transmission ports in the router and then
Howdie, fellow Debianites!
Now, this may be a silly question to ask, but anyway...
My home router is running out of redirectable ports, so I was
wondering: what would happen if I just configured the default
Transmission ports in the router and then let several users run
Transmission
2009/4/12 Angelin Lalev
> Greetings,
>
> Is there some howto or walktrough about how to create and share
> .torrent files with transmission client.
> Some direct help would be even better.
>
> I have some big files (to which I legally own the copyright, btw) I
> want
Angelin Lalev wrote :
> Greetings,
>
> Is there some howto or walktrough about how to create and share
> .torrent files with transmission client.
> Some direct help would be even better.
>
> I have some big files (to which I legally own the copyright, btw) I
> want
Greetings,
Is there some howto or walktrough about how to create and share
.torrent files with transmission client.
Some direct help would be even better.
I have some big files (to which I legally own the copyright, btw) I
wanted to share.
I did the following:
1. I put the files in a folder on
Hi,
> I have three debian boxes on a wireless LAN. Wnen my grandson's Windows
> XP is included on the LAN it saturates the system with transmissions. I
> installed tcpdump which shows repeated lines of transmissions to
> 172.179.211.254.1781
>
> I set up the LAN with no difficulty but I have z
On Sunday 22 June 2003 18:29, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I have three debian boxes on a wireless LAN. Wnen my grandson's Windows
> XP is included on the LAN it saturates the system with transmissions. I
> installed tcpdump which shows repeated lines of transmissions to
> 172.179.211.254.1781
>
>
I have three debian boxes on a wireless LAN. Wnen my grandson's Windows
XP is included on the LAN it saturates the system with transmissions. I
installed tcpdump which shows repeated lines of transmissions to
172.179.211.254.1781
I set up the LAN with no difficulty but I have zero experience
I have a strange problem on my home lan... My linux box is acting as an
IP-Masquerading gateway to my cable-modem connection. I have a couple
100Mbit NICs in my machine, and a 100Mbit NIC in each of the other pcs (a
win95 and win98 box). The problem is that transfers FROM my machine to
either of th
I have a strange problem on my home lan... My linux box is acting as an
IP-Masquerading gateway to my cable-modem connection. I have a couple
100Mbit NICs in my machine, and a 100Mbit NIC in each of the other pcs (a
win95 and win98 box). The problem is that transfers FROM my machine to
either of th
Well I am working on the new syntax to IPchains. Do we have a debianized
version of ipmasqadm that will replace ipautofw? I looked but the debian
site is very slow from me now. Masq is a good as working with the 2.2.1
kernel.
My LP problem has been solved by compliling both PARPORT and PARPORT
A few days ago I bought the info magic Cd's (September '96), I have been
running slackware (for about half to 2/3's of a year), but I got fed up
with it... so I decided to try debian... when I tried to install it went
fine, except for when it got to the part about making the modules
Under cdr
50 matches
Mail list logo
