Re: transferring to sendmail 8.9 while still using hamm

1998-12-11 Thread Michael Stone
Quoting Peter S Galbraith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Michael Stone wrote: > > You will need from slink: (newer versions okay if > > available) > > ldso 1.9.9-5 (libc6 depends on it) > > I don't think so: You're right. I don't know why it was on my sendmail upgrade list, maybe

Re: transferring to sendmail 8.9 while still using hamm

1998-12-11 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Michael Stone wrote: > Quoting Chris Evans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I want to move my sendmail on my two working machines up to 8.9 > > for the improved and built-in antispamming facilities there. > > > > That looks as if it will require a move to a more recent libc6, > > netbase and libdb (an

Re: transferring to sendmail 8.9 while still using hamm

1998-12-11 Thread Michael Stone
Quoting Chris Evans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I want to move my sendmail on my two working machines up to 8.9 > for the improved and built-in antispamming facilities there. > > That looks as if it will require a move to a more recent libc6, > netbase and libdb (and I haven't yet worked out what the

transferring to sendmail 8.9 while still using hamm

1998-12-11 Thread Chris Evans
I'm using Hamm happily (well, almost, see "LI but no LO" if you're on the debian-user list!) I want to move my sendmail on my two working machines up to 8.9 for the improved and built-in antispamming facilities there. That looks as if it will require a move to a more recent libc6, netbase and