On 2000-03-11 11:19:02, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
> This works quite well, I just tried it. However, I got missed up
> when it didn't copy symlinks properly. I had a link /var/somedir to
> the directory /var/SomeDir, and instead of copying the link, it
> copied the whole directory so that I had to ide
On 02-Mar-2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:05:04PM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
>> On 2000-03-01 23:42:21, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
>>
>> > I bought a larger hard-drive for my potato box and want
>> > to transfer my system to it (preserving permissions,
>> > symlinks, et
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 12:48:29AM -0600, Brad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 10:25:13AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > So you can't just "mkdir lost+found" and hope everything works.
> >
> > man (8) mklost+found for more info.
>
> Why not? Checking the source for mklost+found (yes
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 12:48:29AM -0600, Brad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 10:25:13AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > So you can't just "mkdir lost+found" and hope everything works.
> >
> > man (8) mklost+found for more info.
>
> Why not? Checking the source for mklost+found (yes
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 10:25:13AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> So you can't just "mkdir lost+found" and hope everything works.
>
> man (8) mklost+found for more info.
Why not? Checking the source for mklost+found (yes, i actually RTFS ;),
all it does is mkdir /lost+found, create a bun
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 02:15:07AM +, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
> Thanks guys for your help. It's up and running and seems
> to be working well. I did notice one thing I don't
> remember seeing before. I've now got a 67meg file in /proc
> (kcore). Is this a real file? If so, how do I get rid
Thanks guys for your help. It's up and running and seems
to be working well. I did notice one thing I don't
remember seeing before. I've now got a 67meg file in /proc
(kcore). Is this a real file? If so, how do I get rid of it?
Thanks again
MaryK
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 06:26:57PM -0600, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > > > Files and directories are identified under most Linux-like fileystems
> > > > (e2fs, minix fs, UFS, etc., but *not* msdos, vfat), by inodes. An inode
> > > > is essentially
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > > > Files and directories are identified under most Linux-like fileystems
> > > > (e2fs, minix fs, UFS, etc., but *not* msdos, vfat), by inodes. An inode
> > > > is essentially a database entry in a
Subject: Re: transfering to new HDD
Date: Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 08:54:00PM +0200
In reply to:Shaul Karl
Quoting Shaul Karl([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>| > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:05:04PM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
>| > > On 2000-03-01 23:42:21, Mary
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > > Files and directories are identified under most Linux-like fileystems
> > > (e2fs, minix fs, UFS, etc., but *not* msdos, vfat), by inodes. An inode
> > > is essentially a database entry in a table giving storage location,
> > > name, and values
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:25:22PM -0600, Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 10:19:40AM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> > > On 2000-03-01 23:42:37, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:05:04PM -0500, Allan M
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 10:19:40AM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> > On 2000-03-01 23:42:37, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:05:04PM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> > > > On 2000-03-01 23:42:21, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
> >
>
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:05:04PM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> > On 2000-03-01 23:42:21, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
> >
> > > I bought a larger hard-drive for my potato box and want
> > > to transfer my system to it (preserving permissions,
> > > symlinks, etc).
> >
There used to be a very help
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 10:19:40AM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> On 2000-03-01 23:42:37, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:05:04PM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> > > On 2000-03-01 23:42:21, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
>
> > tar cf - source | ( cd /target; tar xpf - )
>
> Ye
On 2000-03-01 23:42:37, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:05:04PM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> > On 2000-03-01 23:42:21, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
> tar cf - source | ( cd /target; tar xpf - )
Yes, that would be more like it.
> There's a utility to recreate the lost+foun
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:05:04PM -0500, Allan M. Wind wrote:
> On 2000-03-01 23:42:21, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
>
> > I bought a larger hard-drive for my potato box and want
> > to transfer my system to it (preserving permissions,
> > symlinks, etc).
>
> partition (cfdisk, fdisk) the drive, forma
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
>
> I bought a larger hard-drive for my potato box and want
> to transfer my system to it (preserving permissions,
> symlinks, etc).
>
> I thought I saw a thread about this, but couldn't find it.
>
> Can anyone tell me what FM to read to get this going
On 2000-03-01 23:42:21, Mary Honeycutt wrote:
> I bought a larger hard-drive for my potato box and want
> to transfer my system to it (preserving permissions,
> symlinks, etc).
partition (cfdisk, fdisk) the drive, format (mkfs) and mount the new
drive.
tar cf top_level_dirs; (cd /new_drive_monu
Hi,
I bought a larger hard-drive for my potato box and want
to transfer my system to it (preserving permissions,
symlinks, etc).
I thought I saw a thread about this, but couldn't find it.
Can anyone tell me what FM to read to get this going?
TIA
MaryK
20 matches
Mail list logo
