On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, sean finney wrote:
sf>priority traffic. a) is a little heavy handed i think and b) won't keep
sf>apache-ssl from disturbing my counterstrike games...
I assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that preserving low latency would have been
enough. If you really need to set some bandwidth
hiya,
this looks pretty cool, but after reading the docs i'm not sure if it
will do what i want. i want to specifically limit all traffic on a
certain port (https) to the outside world to a hard limit, but not
anything else... and it seems that with wondershaper i can either a)
set a hard limit o
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, sean finney wrote:
sf>so, i'd like to set up a shaper that caps the bandwidth for https
sf>connections. i've looked at both the route-based shaper (the one
sf>that works with the shapecfg pkg), and the QoS/CBQ one + the
sf>HTB2 patch (which works with the shaper pkg).
Have a
hi all,
i'm going through the process of attempting to set up a traffic shaper
on my debian box. the deal is, i'm playing online video games on a
certain non-free OS, and all of a sudden my connection goes to hell
because i have a friend transferring a sizeable amount of data over
https from my
4 matches
Mail list logo
