On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> My memory is not good :-/
>
> I remember a module inside the kernel named "traffic shaper". Or not?
>
> If yes, where is? I searching inside kernel tree but I don't find it.
>
you can
Hi folks!
My memory is not good :-/
I remember a module inside the kernel named "traffic shaper". Or not?
If yes, where is? I searching inside kernel tree but I don't find it.
but I discover the packages:
[...]
shaperd
trickle
wondershaper
[...]
What is the best way to bala
ipmenu
And when packages comes backup:
http://packages.debian.org/ipmenu
Hi!
I don't quite understand how comes an iptables and iproute gui in to the
picture? I need a traffic shaper like util, which can control a
process's bandwidth usage. Can I controll it with iptables or iptroute?
Daniel
--
LeVA
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 15:02, LeVA wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm looking for an application which can limit another process's
> bandwith usage. A program called 'trickle' does this perfectly, but I've
> read a few minutes ago on it's homepage, that the programmer stopped
> developing it, and I can not
Hello!
I'm looking for an application which can limit another process's
bandwith usage. A program called 'trickle' does this perfectly, but I've
read a few minutes ago on it's homepage, that the programmer stopped
developing it, and I can not compile the latest version, because after
typing ma
:56 Europe/London, LeVA wrote:
Hi!
I need a program to control my download/upload speed, independently
from what program I am using to download/upload. Is there a software
for this, or I have to use the kernel's traffic shaper?
Thanks!
--
LeVA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:56:25PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
> I need a program to control my download/upload speed, independently
> from what program I am using to download/upload. Is there a software
> for this, or I have to use the kernel's traffic shaper?
Google for "wondersh
LeVA said on Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:56:25PM +0200:
> Hi!
>
> I need a program to control my download/upload speed, independently from
> what program I am using to download/upload. Is there a software for
> this, or I have to use the kernel's traffic shaper?
Che
>Hi!
>
>I need a program to control my download/upload speed, independently from
>what program I am using to download/upload. Is there a software for
>this, or I have to use the kernel's traffic shaper?
>
>Thanks!
>
I still didn't try it, but I've read o
Hi!
I need a program to control my download/upload speed, independently from
what program I am using to download/upload. Is there a software for
this, or I have to use the kernel's traffic shaper?
Thanks!
--
LeVA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Hello David,
Am 17:26 2002-12-05 +1100 hat David Cureton geschrieben:
>> If so, tough. You can only shape outgoing traffic. Think about it.
>^
>
>Ahhh, surely it would be possible to manipulate the tcp sliding window to
>cause incomming
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:12:43PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do you propose to stop the other bloke from sending it?
ICMP source quench exists for a reason.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better thing
> On Thursday 05 December 2002 16:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > I have only a dial up connection (stone age, I know). I notice there
> > > a number of traffic shaper/QoS solutions around now and I am wondering
> > > if anyone
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:26:23PM +1100, David Cureton wrote:
> > If so, tough. You can only shape outgoing traffic. Think about it.
> ^
>
> Ahhh, surely it would be possible to manipulate the tcp sliding window to
> cause incomming tra
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I have only a dial up connection (stone age, I know). I notice there
> > a number of traffic shaper/QoS solutions around now and I am wondering
> > if anyone has an opinion which is the
On Thursday 05 December 2002 16:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I have only a dial up connection (stone age, I know). I notice there
> > a number of traffic shaper/QoS solutions around now and I am wondering
> > if anyone has an opinion which is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I have only a dial up connection (stone age, I know). I notice there
> a number of traffic shaper/QoS solutions around now and I am wondering
> if anyone has an opinion which is the best. I want the usual things,
> in this order:
What are you trying to
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Britton wrote:
> 7. Defocused temporal perception, al la Sirius Cybernetics Corporation
> Happy Vertical People Transporters, but without the neurosis or
> horizontal motion. The traffic shaper should be able anticipate when
> I will touch that firs
I have only a dial up connection (stone age, I know). I notice there a
number of traffic shaper/QoS solutions around now and I am wondering if
anyone has an opinion which is the best. I want the usual things, in this
order:
1. Low latency for ssh, ftp etc.
2. Next lowest latency for http(s
19 matches
Mail list logo
