Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> geisha [~] $ dpkg -S top|grep bin
> xpdf: /usr/bin/pdftops
> procps: /usr/bin/top
>
>
> and yes, that command actually runs. I maintain a absolutely current potato
> box so I can compile packages.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /de
Ok, seems the new version of procps (which my mirror did not have) does indeed
lack top. This fix is on its way to the maintainer.
Sorry for the confusion.
geisha [~] $ dpkg -S top|grep bin
xpdf: /usr/bin/pdftops
procps: /usr/bin/top
and yes, that command actually runs. I maintain a absolutely current potato
box so I can compile packages.
Then why is it not on my system today, but yesterday it was? :) Since then,
the only thing that I can account for it, is running apt-get update; apt-get
upgrade (I run this pretty much every day, sometimes even twice... :)
$ locate top | egrep "top$" | grep -v desktop
/usr/bin/cdstop
/usr/bin/gtop
On 14-Sep-99 Seth R Arnold wrote:
> Ok, top was in the unstable yesterday. Today it is not? I miss top. I liked
> top. It might not have been the best, nor the prettiest, but I liked it.
>
> Does anyone know more about it?
>
It is in procps -- has been for some time.
Ok, top was in the unstable yesterday. Today it is not? I miss top. I liked
top. It might not have been the best, nor the prettiest, but I liked it.
Does anyone know more about it?
:)
--
Seth Arnold | http://www.willamette.edu/~sarnold/
Hate spam? See http://maps.vix.com/rbl/ for help
Hi! I'm
6 matches
Mail list logo