Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Raffaele Morelli
On 20/11/14 at 12:51am, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Raffaele Morelli wrote: > >On 19/11/14 at 07:53pm, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >>Peter Nieman wrote: > >>>On 19/11/14 22:21, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Raffaele Morelli
On 20/11/14 at 12:49am, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Raffaele Morelli wrote: > >On 19/11/14 at 04:21pm, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >>Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >>>On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state > o

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Raffaele Morelli wrote: On 19/11/14 at 07:53pm, Miles Fidelman wrote: Peter Nieman wrote: On 19/11/14 22:21, Miles Fidelman wrote: Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state of al

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Raffaele Morelli wrote: On 19/11/14 at 04:21pm, Miles Fidelman wrote: Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state of alternatives. If you insist then please use the d-community-offt

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Raffaele Morelli
On 19/11/14 at 07:53pm, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Peter Nieman wrote: > >On 19/11/14 22:21, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >>Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >>>On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state > of alterna

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Raffaele Morelli
On 19/11/14 at 04:21pm, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >>Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state > >>of alternatives. > >If you insist then please use the d-community-offtopic list[1],

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Scott Ferguson wrote: Thanks for responding. On 20/11/14 11:47, Miles Fidelman wrote: Scott Ferguson wrote: On 20/11/14 08:14, Miles Fidelman wrote: Brian wrote: On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, A

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread golinux
On Wed, 11/19/14, Scott Ferguson wrote: Subject: Re: the developers have spoken To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014, 7:25 PM [cut] You must be thinking of someone else. Indeed, after re-reading, I am (Golinux). My apologies for that

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Scott Ferguson
Thanks for responding. On 20/11/14 11:47, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Scott Ferguson wrote: >> On 20/11/14 08:14, Miles Fidelman wrote: >>> Brian wrote: On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Jonathan Dowland wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100,

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Peter Nieman
On 20/11/14 01:04, Brian wrote: You could create a free software progam which falsely shouts 'fire' over the public broadcasting system in a crowded theatre. From your point of view that would seem to be the best of all possible worlds. None of the people who were told to fuck off shouted fire

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 20/11/14 10:15, Peter Nieman wrote: > On 19/11/14 22:21, Miles Fidelman wrote: >> Jonathan Dowland wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state of alternatives. >>> If you insist then plea

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Scott Ferguson wrote: On 20/11/14 10:16, Brian wrote: On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 16:14:46 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Brian wrote: On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: No, not nece

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Peter Nieman wrote: On 19/11/14 22:21, Miles Fidelman wrote: Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state of alternatives. If you insist then please use the d-community-offtopic list

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Scott Ferguson wrote: On 20/11/14 08:14, Miles Fidelman wrote: Brian wrote: On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: The vast majority on debian-user see this list as being for th

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Thu 20 Nov 2014 at 00:15:04 +0100, Peter Nieman wrote: > On 19/11/14 22:21, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >>On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >>>Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state > >>>of alternatives. > >>If

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread GypsyRoseLee
On Thu 20 Nov 2014 at 10:03:25 +1100, Myceneaen Magic wrote: > On 20/11/14 09:41, GypsyRoseLee wrote: > > > You will surely be aware that our company has the > > rights to Fortune Telling throughout most countriea in the world. > > (sigh) Yes - obtained by humbuggery and magic tricks. Stock i

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 20/11/14 10:16, Brian wrote: > On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 16:14:46 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > >> Brian wrote: >>> On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: >>> Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> No, not ne

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Peter Nieman
On 19/11/14 22:21, Miles Fidelman wrote: Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state of alternatives. If you insist then please use the d-community-offtopic list[1], which was set up

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 16:14:46 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Brian wrote: > >On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > >>Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >>>On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > No, not necessarily. For many, it means that Debia

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Myceneaen Magic
On 20/11/14 09:41, GypsyRoseLee wrote: > On Thu 20 Nov 2014 at 06:57:03 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> On 20/11/14 04:01, golinux wrote: >>> On Wed, 11/19/14, songbird wrote: >>> >>> Subject: the developers have spoken >>> To: debian-user@li

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread GypsyRoseLee
On Thu 20 Nov 2014 at 06:57:03 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 20/11/14 04:01, golinux wrote: > > On Wed, 11/19/14, songbird wrote: > > > > Subject: the developers have spoken > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014, 8

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 23:12:49 +0300, Reco wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:11:17PM +, Brian wrote: > > On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 20:55:02 +0300, Reco wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:44:01AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > > > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:11:18 -0500 >

Re: Re: Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread tor...@riseup.net
>Don't forget, I am also a user. If I felt the project no longer >represented >my interests, I would leave. I would not waste my time or the >project's >by continuing to complain about what might have been. That sure makes sense. But there might be people who a) are very emotional about Debian a

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread José Silva
On 19/11/14 22:08, Scott Ferguson wrote: [curious] Other than a possible exercise in self-validation - if, as you've previously stated, *you have ceased using Debian* - why do you continue posting to Debian user? Although not his advocate, he could, as myself, be changing all his boxes to FreeB

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 19 November 2014 16:49:13 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 19 November 2014 14:11:18 songbird wrote: kudoes, much love, go jessie! :-)) +1 Lisi This was intended for the list, not to go off-list. Sorry again, Songbird. I need to press

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 20/11/14 08:14, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Brian wrote: >> On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: >> >>> Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> >> The vast majority on debian-user see this list as being for the suppo

Re: Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Please do not CC me, I'm subscribed to the list. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:53:49PM +0100, tor...@riseup.net wrote: > I could swear that the Social Contract states: > We will not hide problems > and > Our priority are our users. of course it does. But posting here about other OSes is not priori

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state of alternatives. If you insist then please use the d-community-offtopic list[1], which was set up for these situations. How about, no.

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Chris Bannister wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:43:22PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: The main thing that keeps me on Linux is Xen. Xen Dom0 on FreeBSD would have me there in an instant. https://wiki.netbsd.org/tutorials/how_to_set_up_a_xen_dom0/ Well yeah - but NetBSD doesn't have a stabl

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Brian wrote: On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: No, not necessarily. For many, it means that Debian Linux is dying and will soon be dead -- or rather, no longer relevant. I jus

Re: Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread tor...@riseup.net
Miles Fidelman wrote: > Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state of > alternatives. After 6 years of using Debian, which was pretty much the only OS i ever used, Gentoo is a good systemd-free alternative for me. Slightly less comfortable, but a helpful community makes it

Re: Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread tor...@riseup.net
Jonathan Dowland wrote: >Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> No, not necessarily. For maony, it means that Debian Linux is dying >> and will soon be dead -- or rather, no longer relevant. I just hope >> that the alternative in FreeBSD works out. >I encourage you to find out sooner, rather than later, b

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread yoklar
Sorry for top posting On 19/11/2014 10:34 pm, "yoklar" wrote: > > I know I know Debian provides now systemd. > > On 19/11/2014 10:01 pm, "Brian" wrote: >> >> On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 21:54:12 +0200, yoklar wrote: >> >> > On 19/11/2014 9:45 pm, "Jonathan Dowland" wrote: >> > > >> > > On Wed, Nov 19,

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread yoklar
I know I know Debian provides now systemd. On 19/11/2014 10:01 pm, "Brian" wrote: > On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 21:54:12 +0200, yoklar wrote: > > > On 19/11/2014 9:45 pm, "Jonathan Dowland" wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > > Please DO report back

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Reco
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:11:17PM +, Brian wrote: > On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 20:55:02 +0300, Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:44:01AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:11:18 -0500 > > > songbird wrote: > > > > > > > let us thank each one of t

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 21:54:12 +0200, yoklar wrote: > On 19/11/2014 9:45 pm, "Jonathan Dowland" wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state > > > of alternatives. > > > > If you insist the

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 19 nov 14, 14:06:16, Haines Brown wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/11/msg00014.html > > > > The winners are: > > Option 4 "General Resolution is not required" > > I ponder the implications of this vote. I suppose it means that the > current trajectory of

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 20/11/14 04:01, golinux wrote: > On Wed, 11/19/14, songbird wrote: > > Subject: the developers have spoken > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014, 8:11 AM > >the vote is in. > > [cut] > > ---

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread yoklar
On 19/11/2014 9:45 pm, "Jonathan Dowland" wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state > > of alternatives. > > If you insist then please use the d-community-offtopic list[1], which > was set up f

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 14:06:16 -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/11/msg00014.html > > > > The winners are: > > Option 4 "General Resolution is not required" > > I ponder the implications of this vote. I suppose it means that the > current tra

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Please DO report back. Some of us really do want to know the state > of alternatives. If you insist then please use the d-community-offtopic list[1], which was set up for these situations. Thanks [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.o

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Thu 20 Nov 2014 at 05:56:41 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > > On 20/11/2014 5:45 AM, Brian wrote: > > The vast majority on debian-user see this list as being for the support > > of users who *use* Debian and not a talking shop about it. Encouragement > > to pervert its purpose is little short

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:43:22PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > The main thing that keeps me on Linux is Xen. Xen Dom0 on FreeBSD would > have me there in an instant. https://wiki.netbsd.org/tutorials/how_to_set_up_a_xen_dom0/ -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 20:55:02 +0300, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:44:01AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:11:18 -0500 > > songbird wrote: > > > > > let us thank each one of them for their efforts > > > to continue making Debian what it is: > > >

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Haines Brown
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/11/msg00014.html > > The winners are: > Option 4 "General Resolution is not required" I ponder the implications of this vote. I suppose it means that the current trajectory of Debian's development is held to be satisfactory. Given this, n

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Andrew McGlashan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/11/2014 5:45 AM, Brian wrote: > The vast majority on debian-user see this list as being for the support > of users who *use* Debian and not a talking shop about it. Encouragement > to pervert its purpose is little short of bad manners, no matte

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 13:05:20 -0500, Doug wrote: > On 11/19/2014 09:11 AM, songbird wrote: > > the vote is in. > > > > let us thank each one of them for their efforts > >to continue making Debian what it is: > > > > a fractious and wonderful expression of free source > >code, the ability to

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Nov 2014 at 12:41:45 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > >>No, not necessarily. For many, it means that Debian Linux is dying > >>and will soon be dead -- or rather, no longer relevant. I just hop

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread songbird
Lisi Reisz wrote: > songbird wrote: >> kudoes, much love, go jessie! > >:-)) +1 :) > Lisi > > This was intended for the list, not to go off-list. Sorry again, Songbird. > I > need to press L for the Debian list, not click on reply. And I don't > remember to do it. I'll plead old age,

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 19 Nov 2014, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > >>No, not necessarily. For many, it means that Debian Linux is dying > >>and will soon be dead -- or rather, no longer relevant. I just hope > >>that the alternat

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Doug
On 11/19/2014 09:11 AM, songbird wrote: the vote is in. let us thank each one of them for their efforts to continue making Debian what it is: a fractious and wonderful expression of free source code, the ability to distribute such in a relatively sane and safe manner. kudoes, much

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:44:01AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:11:18 -0500 > songbird wrote: > > > let us thank each one of them for their efforts > > to continue making Debian what it is: > > Really ? I thought they were making Debian something quite different

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Peter Nieman
On 19/11/14 15:44, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:11:18 -0500 songbird wrote: let us thank each one of them for their efforts to continue making Debian what it is: Really ? I thought they were making Debian something quite different from what it is... However you lo

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
golinux wrote: On Wed, 11/19/14, songbird wrote: Subject: the developers have spoken To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014, 8:11 AM the vote is in. [cut] My beloved Debian, RIP. Very sad that the ride will be

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Andrew McGlashan wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/11/2014 4:01 AM, golinux wrote: My beloved Debian, RIP. Very sad that the ride will be over when when Squeeze and Wheezy (and possibly Jessie - jury is still out) get to EOL . . . golinux (soon to be linuxrip)

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: No, not necessarily. For many, it means that Debian Linux is dying and will soon be dead -- or rather, no longer relevant. I just hope that the alternative in FreeBSD works out. I encourage you to find o

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Miles Fidelman
Andrew McGlashan wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/11/2014 1:11 AM, songbird wrote: the vote is in. let us thank each one of them for their efforts to continue making Debian what it is: a fractious and wonderful expression of free source code, the ability to distrib

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Andrew McGlashan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/11/2014 4:01 AM, golinux wrote: > My beloved Debian, RIP. Very sad that the ride will be over when when > Squeeze and Wheezy (and possibly Jessie - jury is still out) get to EOL > . . . > > golinux > > (soon to be linuxrip) 1 I am great

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread golinux
On Wed, 11/19/14, songbird wrote: Subject: the developers have spoken To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2014, 8:11 AM the vote is in. [cut] My beloved Debian, RIP. Very sad that the ride will be over when when

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Curt
On 2014-11-19, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: >> > How old? > Not to ask milady's age now, in the upper echelons in which we navigate here, old fellow, n'est-ce pas? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Raffaele Morelli
On 19/11/14 at 05:03pm, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 19 November 2014 16:49:13 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Wednesday 19 November 2014 14:11:18 songbird wrote: > > >> kudoes, much love, go jessie! > > >> > > > :-)) +1 > > > > > > Lisi > > > > > > This was intended for

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 16:49:13 Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 November 2014 14:11:18 songbird wrote: > >> kudoes, much love, go jessie! > >> > > :-)) +1 > > > > Lisi > > > > This was intended for the list, not to go off-list. Sorry again, > > Songbird. I

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 19 November 2014 14:11:18 songbird wrote: kudoes, much love, go jessie! :-)) +1 Lisi This was intended for the list, not to go off-list. Sorry again, Songbird. I need to press L for the Debian list, not click on reply. And I don't remember to do it. I'l

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:25:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > No, not necessarily. For many, it means that Debian Linux is dying > and will soon be dead -- or rather, no longer relevant. I just hope > that the alternative in FreeBSD works out. I encourage you to find out sooner, rather tha

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Andrew McGlashan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/11/2014 1:11 AM, songbird wrote: > the vote is in. > > let us thank each one of them for their efforts to continue making > Debian what it is: > > a fractious and wonderful expression of free source code, the > ability to distribute such in a

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 14:11:18 songbird wrote: > kudoes, much love, go jessie! :-)) +1 Lisi This was intended for the list, not to go off-list. Sorry again, Songbird. I need to press L for the Debian list, not click on reply. And I don't remember to do it. I'll plead old age, ;-)

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mercredi, 19 novembre 2014, 15.47:43 Raffaele Morelli a écrit : > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/11/msg00014.html > > The winners are: > Option 4 "General Resolution is not required" For which the complete text [0] is: > The Debian project asks its members to be cons

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Raffaele Morelli
On 19/11/14 at 03:41pm, Dan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:11 PM, songbird wrote: > > the vote is in. > > > > let us thank each one of them for their efforts > > to continue making Debian what it is: > > > > a fractious and wonderful expression of free source > > code, the ability to dis

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Ron
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:11:18 -0500 songbird wrote: > let us thank each one of them for their efforts > to continue making Debian what it is: Really ? I thought they were making Debian something quite different from what it is... Cheers, Ron. -- It is better to sleep on

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread James Allsopp
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/11/msg00171.html On 19 November 2014 14:41, Dan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:11 PM, songbird wrote: > > the vote is in. > > > > let us thank each one of them for their efforts > > to continue making Debian what it is: > > > > a fractious a

Re: the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread Dan
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:11 PM, songbird wrote: > the vote is in. > > let us thank each one of them for their efforts > to continue making Debian what it is: > > a fractious and wonderful expression of free source > code, the ability to distribute such in a relatively > sane and safe manner

the developers have spoken

2014-11-19 Thread songbird
the vote is in. let us thank each one of them for their efforts to continue making Debian what it is: a fractious and wonderful expression of free source code, the ability to distribute such in a relatively sane and safe manner. kudoes, much love, go jessie! songbird -- To UNSUBS