* Rick Dooling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080207 13:28]:
> Hi, all:
>
> I've searched the group for messages on these.
>
> I have one machine running Etch with tetex.
>
> Another newer machine where I haven't installed tetex or texlive.
>
> Anybody with recent experience moving from tetex to texlive
Rick Dooling:
>
> Anybody with recent experience moving from tetex to texlive on Etch?
I don't do much Latex anymore, but the migration should be painless. You
just may have to hunt down some packages you are using with 'apt-cache
search'es.
Texlive appears to be the future, so I wouldn't instal
Hi, all:
I've searched the group for messages on these.
I have one machine running Etch with tetex.
Another newer machine where I haven't installed tetex or texlive.
Anybody with recent experience moving from tetex to texlive on Etch?
Or anybody just going with texlive having any unexpected pr
Micha Feigin wrote:
> What is the difference between the two latex implementations available
> under debian?
tetex is older, abandoned upstream (and upstream author suggests its user to
switch to texlive), and slightly smaller. TeXLive is community maintained
(by different TUG groups), much bigger
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 03:41 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> What is the difference between the two latex implementations available under
> debian?
>
>
This might be helpful:
http://www.tug.org/pipermail/tugindia/2005-June/003454.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:41:03AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> What is the difference between the two latex implementations available under
> debian?
>
I think the main difference is that texlive is the new packaging, which
is more modular (or something like that) and that tetex is the one that
h
What is the difference between the two latex implementations available under
debian?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo