Re: testing process broken

Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) writes: >> Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The process by which software gets into testing needs to be much >> > more rigorous than it is. Consider: >> > >> >xlibs won't upgrade because of bugs in ssh-askpass

Re: testing process broken

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) writes: > Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The process by which software gets into testing needs to be much > > more rigorous than it is. Consider: > > > >xlibs won't upgrade because of bugs in ssh-askpass, sndconfig > >and/or playmidi that are "

Re: testing process broken

Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The process by which software gets into testing needs to be much > more rigorous than it is. Consider: > >xlibs won't upgrade because of bugs in ssh-askpass, sndconfig >and/or playmidi that are "fixed in unstable." Why then, did xlibs >get move

testing process broken

The process by which software gets into testing needs to be much more rigorous than it is. Consider: xlibs won't upgrade because of bugs in ssh-askpass, sndconfig and/or playmidi that are "fixed in unstable." Why then, did xlibs get moved to testing and not the others? reportb