Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 8:42 PM Pier Antonio Corradini wrote: > > I think I got it: the final step is to compare the fingerprint of the primary > key, at the end of the command output > > PS C:\Users\CP\Documents\Linux\Debian12.10.0\HTTPVersion> gpg --verify > SHA512SUMS.sign SHA512SUMS.txt > gp

Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Pier Antonio Corradini wrote: > gpg: Firma valida da "Debian CD signing key " Jay ! \o/ > gpg: ATTENZIONE: questa chiave non è certificata con una firma fidata! > gpg:          Non ci sono indicazioni che la firma appartenga al proprietario. Regrettably gpg still assumes a web of trust to

Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Pier Antonio Corradini wrote: > So now the authenticity check is complete and the authenticity is completely > sure? Yes. Until a quantum computer cracks the riddle how to generate an own key with the same fingerprint. (There are other risks, too, which are not prevented by signature with unc

R: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Pier Antonio Corradini
thenticity is completely sure? Thanks! PA Da: Thomas Schmitt Inviato: Venerdì, 28 Marzo, 2025 18:04 A: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: pierantonio.corrad...@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test Hi, i realize that i posted t

R: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Pier Antonio Corradini
___ Da: Thomas Schmitt Inviato: Venerdì, 28 Marzo, 2025 18:04 A: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: pierantonio.corrad...@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test Hi, i realize that i posted the content of the wrong SHA512SUMS file. The one i posted was from

Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i realize that i posted the content of the wrong SHA512SUMS file. The one i posted was from debian 12.7.0. Nevertheless the SHA512 sums which i posted earlier are of the files from 12.10.0 which i downloaded yesterday. Pier Antonio Corradini wrote: > The content of these links, seen now, is

R: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Pier Antonio Corradini
see the same thing? PA Da: Thomas Schmitt Inviato: Venerdì, 28 Marzo, 2025 14:42 A: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: pierantonio.corrad...@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test Hi, Pier Antonio Corradini wrote

Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Pier Antonio Corradini wrote: > 3D0BA303805111F651A88D96FC64867FFC678E43F3756F5F91B24A810D91015E459... > C:\Users\CP\Documents\Linux\Debian12.10.0\VersioneHTTP\SHA512SUMS.txt I get 36bf1f16bc4b9795122b7b3542a32f34c3be0ef294ff3a8bf43232df6554b69b569fe15d93c79ee48a47902e1a6ad87ca9966988cd4b

R: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test (supplementary attachment)

2025-03-28 Thread Pier Antonio Corradini
ntonio.corrad...@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test Hi, (Please Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org with your replies. I sent my mail with Cc; to you, because the X-Spam-Status: header of your list mail did not indicate that you are subscribed to the list.

R: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Pier Antonio Corradini
Da: Thomas Schmitt Inviato: Venerdì, 28 Marzo, 2025 08:50 A: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: pierantonio.corrad...@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test Hi, (Please Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org with your replies. I

Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-28 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, (Please Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org with your replies. I sent my mail with Cc; to you, because the X-Spam-Status: header of your list mail did not indicate that you are subscribed to the list.) Pier Antonio Corradini wrote: > So... first step: > PS C:\Users\CP> gpg --keyserver hkps://ke

Re: Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-27 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Pier Antonio Corradini wrote: > Autenticity control (gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign SHA512SUMS.txt): > [...] > gpg:                utilizzando la chiave RSA > DF9B9C49EAA9298432589D76DA87E80D6294BE9B > gpg: Firma BAD da "Debian CD signing key " I assume that "Firma BAD" means bad signature. I

Help: debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso autenticity test

2025-03-27 Thread Pier Antonio Corradini
Hi, >From URL https://www.debian.org/download, debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso and >SHA512SUMS and Signature. From: certutil -hashfile debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso SHA512 ... iso file integrity OK! Autenticity control (gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign SHA512SUMS.txt): gpg: Firma effettuata 03/1

Re: CUPS test page prints but nothing else can print

2025-02-11 Thread Chris Green
Chris Green wrote: > I have just [re]installed an HP Laserjet Pro M15w printer on my T470 > laptop which runs Debian 12. > > The CUPS test page prints succesfully but nothing else seems able to > print. The CUPS Print Status window shows the job for a few seconds > but then

CUPS test page prints but nothing else can print

2025-02-11 Thread Chris Green
I have just [re]installed an HP Laserjet Pro M15w printer on my T470 laptop which runs Debian 12. The CUPS test page prints succesfully but nothing else seems able to print. The CUPS Print Status window shows the job for a few seconds but then it flashes the red cross indicating an error and the

Re: How can I test the graphics card?

2025-01-06 Thread Max Nikulin
It seems the message, I am replying to, was rejected by the mailing list server, likely due to an attachment with a screenshot. That is why all quoted lines are preserved. On 06/01/2025 00:53, Serkan Kurt wrote: Thank you Max. I managed to install the "nv84" firmware by adapting the instructio

Re: How can I test the graphics card?

2025-01-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 31/12/2024 18:07, Serkan Kurt wrote: nouveau :01:00.0: firmware: failed to load nouveau/nv84_xuc00f (-2) nouveau :01:00.0: firmware: failed to load nouveau/nv84_xuc00f (-2) nouveau :01:00.0: Direct firmware load for nouveau/nv84_xuc00f failed with error -2 Have you trying to find

Re: How can I test the graphics card?

2025-01-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 01/01/2025 01:50, Hans wrote: # apt install nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver firmware-misc-nonfree Do NOT update any other packages, even if aptitude is suggesting it. Most people in the past believe, they must upgrade other packages, too. This is NOT necessary and break your system! You have

Re: How can I test the graphics card?

2024-12-31 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2024-12-31 13:49 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> "Your card is only supported by the 340 legacy drivers series, which >> is only available up to buster." > > For such old hardware you're probably better off *not* using the > proprietary driver. Or graphics intensive software like blender. The

Re: How can I test the graphics card?

2024-12-31 Thread Hans
ting Nvidia drivers I like to use glmark2 > > # apt install glmark2 > > > > If your GUI is using Wayland, then also install glmark2-wayland > > # apt install glmark2 glmark2-wayland > > > > $ glmark2 > > or > > $ glmark2-wayland (for Wayland systems) &g

Re: How can I test the graphics card?

2024-12-31 Thread Stefan Monnier
> "Your card is only supported by the 340 legacy drivers series, which > is only available up to buster." For such old hardware you're probably better off *not* using the proprietary driver. Stefan

Re: How can I test the graphics card?

2024-12-31 Thread Serkan Kurt
If your GUI is using Wayland, then also install glmark2-wayland > # apt install glmark2 glmark2-wayland > > $ glmark2 > or > $ glmark2-wayland (for Wayland systems) > > Hope this helps. > > George. > > > On Tuesday, 31-12-2024 at 22:07 Serkan Kurt wrote: > >

Re: How can I test the graphics card?

2024-12-31 Thread George at Clug
-wayland $ glmark2 or $ glmark2-wayland (for Wayland systems) Hope this helps. George. On Tuesday, 31-12-2024 at 22:07 Serkan Kurt wrote: > Hi! > How can I test memory of the graphics card? > How can I test other features of the graphics card? > Is there free software for this purpo

How can I test the graphics card?

2024-12-31 Thread Serkan Kurt
Hi! How can I test memory of the graphics card? How can I test other features of the graphics card? Is there free software for this purpose? The menu texts in the "Blender" software are not readable. Sometimes the system freezes while watching a video. nouveau :01:00.0: fifo: C

test

2024-12-27 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Hello all, I m sorry but I have to test to generate a log entry sorry Stefan

Re: binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ

2024-11-18 Thread Yassine Chaouche
that the [ binary, the [ shell builtin and the test command all share the same C source code (test.c) which has different #ifdef branches to handle all three outputs. #define TEST_STANDALONE 1 this ensures that code for the test binary is executed, otherwise it produces the test shell builtin

binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ

2024-11-18 Thread Yassine Chaouche
Dear debian and linux enthusiasts, Have you ever stopped and wondered: Are `/usr/bin/[` and `/usr/bin/test` truly unique across all unices? # diff /usr/bin/\[ /usr/bin/test Binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ # ls /usr/bin/\[ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 67K Sep 20 2022 '/us

Re: binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ

2024-11-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:57:05 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Am 18.11.2024 um 11:45 schrieb Yassine Chaouche: > > Dear debian and linux enthusiasts, > > > > Have you ever stopped and wondered: > > Are `/usr/bin/[` and `/usr/bin/test` truly unique across all unices? >

Re: binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ

2024-11-18 Thread Arno Lehmann
Am 18.11.2024 um 11:45 schrieb Yassine Chaouche: Dear debian and linux enthusiasts, Have you ever stopped and wondered: Are `/usr/bin/[` and `/usr/bin/test` truly unique across all unices? interesting question (and observation below). I can't say I ever really cared, and I'm not

Re: binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ

2024-11-18 Thread tomas
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:45:53AM +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote: > Dear debian and linux enthusiasts, > > Have you ever stopped and wondered: > Are `/usr/bin/[` and `/usr/bin/test` truly unique across all unices? > > # diff /usr/bin/\[ /usr/bin/test > Binary files /usr/bi

Re: binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ

2024-11-18 Thread Michael Stone
. In practice, neither bin/test nor bin/[ are used much on a modern system--your shell almost certainly has a built-in version which takes precedence in most situations.

Re: binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ

2024-11-18 Thread Arno Lehmann
-l /sbin/ | grep -- '-> lvm' | wc -l 43 A wrapper script can't be used to differentiate test and [, however, because of the way the final argument is treated. Actually, I'm kind of sure it would be possible, but it would also be pretty stupid to do so, as such a "w

Re: binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ

2024-11-18 Thread tomas
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 12:30:03PM +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote: > Le 11/18/24 à 11:50, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit : > > > > Help yourseof :) > > > > https://sources.debian.org/src/coreutils/ > > > > (Of course, apt-get source coreutils would do the same). > > > > Cheers > > > Thank you toma

Fwd: test sent date details

2024-06-18 Thread Keith Bainbridge
All the best Keith Bainbridge keithr...@gmail.com keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com +61 (0)447 667 468 UTC + 10:00 Forwarded Message Subject: test sent date details Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:56:41 +1000 From: Keith Bainbridge To: keithr...@gmail.com All the best Keith

Re: test sent date details

2024-06-18 Thread keithrbau
It has worked All the best Keith Bainbridge keithr...@gmail.com keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com +61 (0)447 667 468 UTC + 10:00 On 18/6/24 17:56, Keith Bainbridge wrote: All the best Keith Bainbridge keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com +61 (0)447 667 468 UTC + 10:00

[SOLVED] Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-17 Thread Franco Martelli
On 30/04/24 at 14:07, Alexandre Rossi wrote: Hi, Basically I've the same issue described here: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using Debian 12 Bookwor

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-10 Thread Franco Martelli
Hi Alexandre, On 07/05/24 at 11:56, Alexandre Rossi wrote: My hypothesis: speaker-test outputs directly to ALSA (kernel) but ALSA redirects to pulseaudio (the 99-pulse.conf file) and pulseaudio Output profile is stereo. Therefore, pulseaudio downmixes 5.1 to stereo. That would explain why only

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-07 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > > My understanding is that pulseaudio uses alsa for kernel interface and > > that speaker-test uses alsa directly. So if one cannot get speaker-test > > to sound right, it cannot work with pulseaudio. That why I suggest > > workarounds > > in alsa conf (a

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-06 Thread Franco Martelli
audio daemon, maybe I've pulseaudio daemon misconfiguration My understanding is that pulseaudio uses alsa for kernel interface and that speaker-test uses alsa directly. So if one cannot get speaker-test to sound right, it cannot work with pulseaudio. That why I suggest workarounds in alsa conf

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-02 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > > > The issue is that speaker-test doesn't play sound to the correct speaker. > > > If > > > I run: > > > > > > ~$ speaker-test -Dplug:surround51 -c6 -s3 -f75 > > > > > > The sound comes from (Center), (Front right), (R

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-05-01 Thread Franco Martelli
Hi Alexandre, On 30/04/24 at 14:07, Alexandre Rossi wrote: Hi, Basically I've the same issue described here: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using

Re: speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-04-30 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, > Basically I've the same issue described here: > https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers > > The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using > Debian 12 Bookworm, I've no ~/.asound

speaker-test: no correct sound output on LFE and others speakers

2024-04-29 Thread Franco Martelli
Hi everyone, Basically I've the same issue described here: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using Debian 12 Bookworm, I've no ~/.asoundrc file. M

test

2024-04-13 Thread Frank McCormick
test

Test

2024-04-11 Thread D
Hi debian users

test of a gnuplot bug visible with Pango 1.52 (Debian/unstable)

2024-02-29 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, Since the upgrade of the Pango library to 1.52 in Debian/unstable, I'm seeing an annoying bug in gnuplot with the wxt terminal. The issue can be reproduced with the following command: echo 'set terminal wxt; plot x' | gnuplot -persist A window appears, but it is not drawn and it cannot be

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-25 Thread Max Nikulin
On 26/01/2024 07:09, Stefan Monnier wrote: systemctl --user status pipewire{,-pulse} wireplumber which shows that `wireplumber` failed to start. I was assuming that systemctl --user --failed journalctl --user --boot and as root systemctl --failed journalctl --boot were

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-25 Thread Stefan Monnier
> The problem might be in between of > > lspci -vnn Spews out a lot of stuff, the relevant part being presumably: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller [8086:284b] (rev 03) Subsystem: Lenovo ThinkPad T61/R61 [17aa:20ac]

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-25 Thread Max Nikulin
On 24/01/2024 04:28, Stefan Monnier wrote: But since `pactl` seems to still be useful for Pipewire, I tried `pavucontrol` and it shows me no device from which to select in the "Output Devices". Now, how do I figure out why that is? The problem might be in between of lspci -vnn and p

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-23 Thread Stefan Monnier
> But since `pactl` seems to still be useful for Pipewire, I tried > `pavucontrol` and it shows me no device from which to select in the > "Output Devices". Hmm... actually, not quite: there is one output device, called "Dummy Output". And there is similarly just one input device listed, called

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-23 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> Server Version: 15.0.0 >> Default Sample Specification: float32le 2ch 48000Hz >> Default Channel Map: front-left,front-right >> Default Sink: @DEFAULT_SINK@ >> Default Source: @DEFAULT_SOURCE@ >> Cookie: 40db:2cde >> % >> >> Not sure what the `Cookie` does and even l

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-23 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > Server Version: 15.0.0 > Default Sample Specification: float32le 2ch 48000Hz > Default Channel Map: front-left,front-right > Default Sink: @DEFAULT_SINK@ > Default Source: @DEFAULT_SOURCE@ > Cookie: 40db:2cde > % > > Not sure what the `Cookie` d

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-23 Thread Stefan Monnier
> OK. First diagnostic: `pactl info`. > > On my bookworm desktop, I get this: > > $ pactl info > Server String: /run/user/1042/pulse/native > Library Protocol Version: 35 > Server Protocol Version: 35 > Is Local: yes > Client Index: 13692 > Tile Size: 65472 > User Name: dsr > Host Name: spike > Ser

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-22 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Does mplayer give any more interesting errors? > > Oh, I didn't notice it at first, but now that you ask, yes it does: > after something like a timeout period it says: > > AO: [pulse] Init failed: Timeout > Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse' > > And lo

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Max Nikulin
On 22/01/2024 04:26, Charles Curley wrote: You and I seem to be having similar problems. No, you don't. Charles, your graphics adapter is supported by i965, but not iHD and vainfo reports a number of profiles https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20240113101948.0a880f26@hawk.localdomain Chrom

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Does mplayer give any more interesting errors? Oh, I didn't notice it at first, but now that you ask, yes it does: after something like a timeout period it says: AO: [pulse] Init failed: Timeout Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse' And lo and behold if I start it with `mplayer -a

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Charles Curley
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:51:17 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: > So, IIUC the problem is that the hardware video decoder drivers aren't > found for some reason. I checked my VA-related packages and they seem > to be installed: > > # aptitude search '\' | grep '^i' > i A i965-va-driver - VAAPI

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2024-01-20 18:51 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Whenever I try to view videos in Firefox in my trusty Thinkpad T61, > Firefox just eats up the CPU but doesn't actually show the video. > > At startup I get the following message: > > [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > > This should be the Intel 4500 integrated gpu, which is part of > > the i915/i965 family. It needs: > > > > - an intel kernel module > > According to `lsmod | grep '^i'` I have `i915` loaded. Is that the one? Yes. > > - X11 running the intel video driver > > Interesti

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Stefan Monnier
> This should be the Intel 4500 integrated gpu, which is part of > the i915/i965 family. It needs: > > - an intel kernel module According to `lsmod | grep '^i'` I have `i915` loaded. Is that the one? > - X11 running the intel video driver Interesting. I was using the `modesetting` driver. So I

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > Whenever I try to view videos in Firefox in my trusty Thinkpad T61, > Firefox just eats up the CPU but doesn't actually show the video. > > At startup I get the following message: > > [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API test failed: failed to initial

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-21 Thread Stefan Monnier
Max Nikulin [2024-01-21 10:51:36] wrote: > On 21/01/2024 06:51, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API test failed: failed to initialise VAAPI >> connection. > [...] >> Any idea what might be going on? Any hint how I could diagnose the problem? > I

Re: Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-20 Thread Max Nikulin
On 21/01/2024 06:51, Stefan Monnier wrote: [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API test failed: failed to initialise VAAPI connection. [...] Any idea what might be going on? Any hint how I could diagnose the problem? I would start from comparison of "vainfo" output and related s

Can't view videos in firefox: VA-API test failed

2024-01-20 Thread Stefan Monnier
Whenever I try to view videos in Firefox in my trusty Thinkpad T61, Firefox just eats up the CPU but doesn't actually show the video. At startup I get the following message: [GFX1-]: vaapitest: VA-API test failed: failed to initialise VAAPI connection. So, IIUC the problem is tha

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread tomas
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 05:32:04PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: [...] > Perhaps you should use debian-lists-test, > <https://lists.debian.org/debian-lists-test/>. **THANK YOU** (I know, I'm breaking my promise of bowing out of this thread, but this is just the kind of constru

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread tomas
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 09:08:11PM +, Tixy wrote: > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. Folks: the OP might be a bit of a challenge to some

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread fjd
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023, Vít Smolík wrote: Should someone report the mail to the mailmasters as stated in here: https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.en.html Or is it too small of an issue to even report? it's teensy. fjd -- Davis Verbum sat sapienti.

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Vít Smolík
Vít Smolík (12023-12-23): Yeah, it is the Code of Conduct, sorry, didn't realize that. Could there be some SpamAssassin config that we could send to the list-masters, that would catch theese kinds of messages? Not without catching some legitimate questions and answers too. “Test” is a

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Nicolas George
Vít Smolík (12023-12-23): > Yeah, it is the Code of Conduct, sorry, didn't realize that. Could there be > some SpamAssassin config that we could send to the list-masters, that would > catch theese kinds of messages? Not without catching some legitimate questions and answers too. “T

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Vít Smolík
ome.” And for people who pretend they did notice, it also the seventh rule: “Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client is working.” At this point, people should ignore that person. I could suggest sending them answers that seem legit but will cause them to break

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Nicolas George
t welcome.” And for people who pretend they did notice, it also the seventh rule: “Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client is working.” At this point, people should ignore that person. I could suggest sending them answers that seem legit but will cause them to

Re: Test

2023-12-23 Thread Vít Smolík
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:37 PM Pocket wrote: On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. I am not spamming this list I am trying to

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:37 PM Pocket wrote: > > On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > >> This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list.

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Tom Furie
Pocket writes: > On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: >> On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: >>> This is a test of the emergency broadcast system >> Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. > > I am not spamming this list I am t

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Pocket
On 12/22/23 16:08, Tixy wrote: On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. I am not spamming this list I am trying to determine if my email setup is working.

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Lee
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 4:08 PM Tixy wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system > > Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. Would forwarding his message to commun...@debian.org an

Re: Test

2023-12-22 Thread Tixy
On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:15 -0500, Pocket wrote: > This is a test of the emergency broadcast system Please stop spamming the 1000 or so people subscribed to this list. -- Tixy

Test

2023-12-22 Thread Pocket
This is a test of the emergency broadcast system

Re: Seeking an sftp location to test a problem?

2023-10-26 Thread john doe
On 10/26/23 15:47, Karen Lewellen wrote: Because shellworld is theonly such door I know of, I need a completely objective sftp location for testing, username  and password. Googling around would lead you to something like [1]. [1] https://www.sftp.net/public-online-sftp-servers -- John Doe

Seeking an sftp location to test a problem?

2023-10-26 Thread Karen Lewellen
Hi folks, Its Karen Lewellen. Going to ask this question carefully. I am having a computer built, due to a combination of experiences, DOS remains my main system. However I do use sftp to reach a Linux shell service called shellworld. Recently when I type exit, or bye, to leave sftp it reboots

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread Dan Ritter
krys...@ibse.cz wrote: > Dan Ritter wrote: > > The kernel announces readiness during boot with: > > dmesg:[ 18.331561] EDAC amd64: Node 0: DRAM ECC enabled. > > > > and then an event looks like this: > > Message from syslogd@HOSTNAME at Jan 25 15:05:51 ... > > kernel:[5964975.397283] [Hardware

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread krystof
Dan Ritter wrote: > The kernel announces readiness during boot with: > dmesg:[ 18.331561] EDAC amd64: Node 0: DRAM ECC enabled. > > and then an event looks like this: > Message from syslogd@HOSTNAME at Jan 25 15:05:51 ... > kernel:[5964975.397283] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no > action r

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread Dan Ritter
Anssi Saari wrote: > Dan Ritter writes: > > > We see ECC errors irregularly and infrequently on both Intel and > > AMD CPUs. > > How/where do you see those on a Debian system? I looked into this > briefly but didn't get anywhere. The kernel announces readiness during boot with: dmesg:[ 18.3

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread Anssi Saari
krys...@ibse.cz writes: > PS: Some commercial memtests should allegedly be able to inject ECC > errors (for example the one from passmark), have anyone tried those? I've tried Passmark's memory tester (the commercial one which includes ECC error injection), but I've had no luck. My desktop has is

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-21 Thread Anssi Saari
Dan Ritter writes: > We see ECC errors irregularly and infrequently on both Intel and > AMD CPUs. How/where do you see those on a Debian system? I looked into this briefly but didn't get anywhere.

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread krystof
Dne úterý 21. února 2023 1:20:50 CET, DdB napsal(a): > Lucky me, i just looked up my hardware (Dual CPU on server MB): > > > https://versus.com/en/amd-epyc-7282 > > Supports ECC memory Yes, but it is sad that you have to search for this information somewhere else than on vendors website. But thi

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread DdB
Am 20.02.2023 um 23:48 schrieb krys...@ibse.cz: > I am sorry, it was little missleading - not that they can not support them, > but there is no official document that would state so. The only official > specsheet I saw that explicitely mentions ECC support is this one: > https://www.amd.com/en/p

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread Dan Ritter
krys...@ibse.cz wrote: > Dear Debian community, > we recently started using AMD Ryzen CPUs, ASRock Rack motherboards and > Kingston unbuffered ECC DIMMs for our small bussiness servers. All the > servers are running on ZFS for which ECC memory is recommended. So I naively > t

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread krystof
DdB wrote: > Did you really read, that epycs cannot support ECC? > At least i can say, that my pools did not report any faults (which ofc > would be several layers above ecc) either in 3 years, which did help in > falling asleep. ;-) I am sorry, it was little missleading - not that they can not su

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread gene heskett
On 2/20/23 13:12, John Hasler wrote: Tape the Americium-241 button out of a smoke detector to a RAM chip. Ooooh, that would be nasty ;o(> But it ought to do the trick. Cheers, Gene Heskett. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread DdB
mended. So I naively > tried to test it actually works. I read EVERY disscussion on EVERY forum I > was able to find (and there is a lot of them, believe me), but I did not find > a satisfying answer. According to the legendary tweet from AMD (for which is > link in every discussion), the R

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread John Hasler
> Hi, thank you for the answer. Honestly it came to my mind I could make > some kind of neutrino emitter, since according to most articles it is > the main source of ECC errors, Neutrons, not neutrinos. The latter rarely interact with matter at all. A neutron source is fairly difficult to make.

Re: Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread John Hasler
Tape the Americium-241 button out of a smoke detector to a RAM chip. -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Test ECC memory

2023-02-20 Thread krystof
Dear Debian community, we recently started using AMD Ryzen CPUs, ASRock Rack motherboards and Kingston unbuffered ECC DIMMs for our small bussiness servers. All the servers are running on ZFS for which ECC memory is recommended. So I naively tried to test it actually works. I read EVERY

Re: Just a test

2022-11-09 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Amn wrote on 09/11/2022 at 01:12:12+0100: > Please disregard this email. Alright, I'll disregard it. -- PEB signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Just a test

2022-11-08 Thread Jeremy Hendricks
I’m Jeremy, how are you? On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 7:27 PM Amn wrote: > Please disregard this email. > >

Just a test

2022-11-08 Thread Amn
Please disregard this email.

debian-lists-test for your test posts, was Re: Which MTA for from-based smarthost selection, local delivery and queuing?

2022-09-08 Thread David Wright
On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 10:54:20 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry, this is a test email. Not sure how to do it "off list" (more > explanation later, maybe) There's a very underpublicised list called debian-lists-test specially designed for such tests. Cheers, David.

test

2022-05-13 Thread steef
test (failure)

Re: how to test and compare performance of bullseye for i386 and amd64

2022-01-27 Thread a
Sorry, last word in last mail is wrong, it should be inconvenience, not  incontinence

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >