On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:33:24PM +0100, Bernd Aufrecht wrote:
>
>> Can i ask why you are bridging a openvpn interface ? why not route ?
>
> For security reasons. My wireless access point has only WEP and so i
> have it connected to my second LAN Port on my home server. I then use
> openvpn t
Bernd Aufrecht:
>
>> Can i ask why you are bridging a openvpn interface ? why not route ?
>
> For security reasons. My wireless access point has only WEP and so i
> have it connected to my second LAN Port on my home server. I then use
> openvpn to connect from from my notebook and bridge int
Can i ask why you are bridging a openvpn interface ? why not route ?
For security reasons. My wireless access point has only WEP and so i
have it connected to my second LAN Port on my home server. I then use
openvpn to connect from from my notebook and bridge into the my local lan.
This s
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:25:08AM +0100, Bernd Aufrecht wrote:
>> sorry I must of missed somethnig you also have a brcmd bridge ? and tap0
>> is not being added to this bridge ?
>
> Hi,
>
> there seems to be no problem if the bridge is running an openvpn starts
>
sorry I must of missed somethnig you also have a brcmd bridge ? and tap0
is not being added to this bridge ?
Hi,
there seems to be no problem if the bridge is running an openvpn starts
as second. But if you stop openvpn, which i did to test something last
week, it takes down the tap0 device
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:18:53AM +0100, Bernd Aufrecht wrote:
>
>> mine always turn up on the right tap devices
>> dev tap0
>> proto tcp-client
>>
>> I explicitly set the dev name
>
> The problem is that openvpn brings up a new tap0 device but
> does
mine always turn up on the right tap devices
dev tap0
proto tcp-client
I explicitly set the dev name
The problem is that openvpn brings up a new tap0 device but
does not add it to the bridge.
You should probably figure out a way to tell OpenVPN to run a script after
it has created the tap
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:43:18PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2009 07:47:06 Bernd Aufrecht wrote:
> > How can I create a permanent tap0 interface?
>
> Tap interfaces are by their very nature transient, so that's not very easy.
> You cou
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 07:47:06 Bernd Aufrecht wrote:
> How can I create a permanent tap0 interface?
Tap interfaces are by their very nature transient, so that's not very easy.
You could use tunctl to create the tap interface, but I'm not sure if
OpenVPN will use an existing
tap0 interface.
Before/etc/init.d/openvpn restart
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 7fff.004063e92326 no eth0
tap0
After /etc/init.d/openvpn restart
bridge name bridge id
Damir Dezeljin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to set tap0 in promisc mode and add it to br0 bridge that is
> set up on boot from /etc/network/interfaces. I would like to avoid adding
> my own program for tap0 registration. Is there anything similar already
> implem
Hi.
I hope that I'm not reposting this e-mail (I never received my first
post).
Is it posible to set up 'tap0' device during Debian boot?
As I know it is needed to send a special IOCTL call to the /dev/net/tun
character device. This IOCTL is used to register the tap0 with the k
Hi.
Is it posible to set up 'tap0' device during Debian boot?
As I know it is needed to send a special IOCTL call to the /dev/net/tun
character device. This IOCTL is used to register the tap0 with the kernel.
I would like to set tap0 in promisc mode and add it to br0 bridge that is
I have a problem with "tap0".
I must down my eth0 and then up.
Can anyone tell me please what package that i install create a tap0?
Or even better, how can i have my eth0 going up after tap0?
Thanks in advance.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
#include
* Hugo Portela [Tue, Feb 11 2003, 08:37:45PM]:
> I am trying to configure pppoe to use the tap0 interface in order to
> be able to use the OpenSource driver for Alcatel USB Speedtouch modem
> with pppoe protocol.
>
> When i execute pppoeconf, only the eth0 and dummy
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
my apologies for the blank message. (new mail client) :-(
once again ...
--
I am trying to configure pppoe to use the tap0 in
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Philippe!
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Philippe Raxhon wrote:
Thanks a lot (I had forgoten that line) but I still have tap0 on
startup, but not in single mode, so it's probably a daemon that is
setting it. The real problem is that tap0 is set has the default route,
and I still have
Question:
When my laptop boots, I see a tap0 interface configured. What is it and
why? How do I disable it?
Also, when I boot, my computer is by default trying to load pppoe (which
I accidentally configured for boot). If I had it connected to my pppoe modem,
then I believe I could
Hi Philippe!
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Philippe Raxhon wrote:
> Thanks a lot (I had forgoten that line) but I still have tap0 on
> startup, but not in single mode, so it's probably a daemon that is
> setting it. The real problem is that tap0 is set has the default route,
> and I
Subject:
Re: Interfaces configuration and tap0
From:
Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:27:58 +0100
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hi Philippe!
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Philippe
config showns only lo and tap0 (being the default
> gateway). That means I have to do:
> - ifconfig tap0 down
> - ifconfig eth1 192.168.1.254
> before starting the ADSL connection (that is then the default gateway).
>
> What is tap0?
> Why doesn't it "load" eth1? W
, ifconfig showns only lo and tap0 (being the default
gateway). That means I have to do:
- ifconfig tap0 down
- ifconfig eth1 192.168.1.254
before starting the ADSL connection (that is then the default gateway).
What is tap0?
Why doesn't it "load" eth1? When I start linux in sing
That did the trick. Thanks, John.
Summary is as follows:
Problem: After upgrading to sid, ppp quit working
Diagnosis: type 'route -n' and noticed tap0 interface in the interface list.
Solution: type 'apt-get remove diald'
Thanks to everyone who helped me with this. I'
txqueuelen:0
tap0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FD:00:00:00:00
inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:0.0.0.0 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:15 errors:0
On 11/13/00, 5:57:28 PM, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> How do I fix this? More generally, where do I look if I'm
> having problems of this form? -chris
alias tap0 ethertap
options tap0 -o tap0 unit=0
...
alias tap15 ethertap
options tap15 -o tap15 unit=15
There's an ethertap readme wi
One of two places: modprobe ethertap or /dev/MAKEDEV. tapX devices are
for the ethertap module. ethertap isn't really required, but is a good
thing to play with. If you know you already have the module loaded/have
enabled it in a custom kernel, then your problem is the devices aren't in
/dev.
.
> > Silver
>
> Hrm no, I think the tap modules are aliases for something,
> and I'm wondering where to find the list of aliases.
I use the tap0 stuff to do networking with user mode linux... I don't know
what's requesting that interface on your computer however.
> Look in /lib/modules/x.y.z/ where x.y.z is your linux kernel version.
> If the modules are not there, you will have to compile them from the kernel
> sources.
> (first, check if they are not included as part of the kernel).
> Silver
Hrm no, I think the tap modules are aliases for something,
and
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian user list (undigested)"
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 6:57 PM
Subject: can't locate module tap0 (tap1,tap2,...,tap15)
> How do I fix this? More generally, where do I look if I'm
> having problems of this form? -chris
>
>
> --
&
How do I fix this? More generally, where do I look if I'm
having problems of this form? -chris
31 matches
Mail list logo
