On Friday, August 29, 2014 12:20:04 AM UTC+5:30, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 25 aug 14, 07:47:54, Rusi Mody wrote:
> > Question 1
> > Given that multiarch only means multiarch libraries and not other 'normal'
> > packages, this 'recommends' looks like a bug. Yes?
> Well, multiarch is still new
On Lu, 25 aug 14, 07:47:54, Rusi Mody wrote:
> Question 1
>
> Given that multiarch only means multiarch libraries and not other 'normal'
> packages, this 'recommends' looks like a bug. Yes?
Well, multiarch is still new and aptitude's dependency resolution might
not cope with it. At this point (a
On Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:10:01 PM UTC+5:30, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 25 aug 14, 07:47:54, Rusi Mody wrote:
> > Two related questions
> > aptitude tells me "upower and upower:i386 are recommended"
> > When I do
> > aptitude install upower upower:i386
> Could you please tell us what your
On Lu, 25 aug 14, 07:47:54, Rusi Mody wrote:
> Two related questions
>
> aptitude tells me "upower and upower:i386 are recommended"
> When I do
> aptitude install upower upower:i386
Could you please tell us what your default and foreign architectures
are?
dpkg --print-architecture
dpkg
Two related questions
aptitude tells me "upower and upower:i386 are recommended"
When I do
aptitude install upower upower:i386
I get all this
--
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libacl1:i386{a} libblkid1:i386{a} libcryptsetup4:i386{a}
libdbus-glib-1-2:i386{
5 matches
Mail list logo