Colin Watson écrivait :
> It's possible to do that, sure, but if you ever try to connect your
> machine to a VPN where other people are using RFC 1918 addresses then
> you'll run into problems if you've been excessively greedy. It's better
> practice to use a more reasonably-sized subnet.
You are
> You may like to know that 10.0.0.0 is a class A network, so
> you can legally
> use a netmask of 255.0.0.0 and a broadcast of 10.255.255.255
> without any
Nope, 10.0.0.0 is not a class A network anymore! 10.0.0.0 is just a
single address out of for example 8.0.0.0/6. CIDR has been around since
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 12:25:55AM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDR?? wrote:
> Mike Egglestone ?crivait :
> > Basically, is it OK networking practise to setup my eth1 as follows?:
> > Network 10.0.0.0
> > IP address 10.0.0.1
> > Netmask 255.255.254
> > broadcast 10.0.1.255
>
> You may like to know tha
Hi,
Mike Egglestone écrivait :
> Basically, is it OK networking practise to setup my eth1 as follows?:
> Network 10.0.0.0
> IP address 10.0.0.1
> Netmask 255.255.254
> broadcast 10.0.1.255
You may like to know that 10.0.0.0 is a class A network, so you can legally
use a netmask of 255.0.
Hi,
I have debian woody acting as a simple firewall/ipmasq box.
eth0 public IP
eth1 private IP.
I'm serving out IP's on eth1 but would like to go beyond 256 nodes.
Currently, this is the setup for eth1:
Network 10.0.0.0
IP address 10.0.0.1
Netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcast 10.0.0.255
My dhcpd.con
TED] wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am a little confused about subnetting. I read an article
> in the linux journal. I later bought a book and it seems to
> give quite a different picture of subnets.
>
> First a quote from the book:
> Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 Unleashed
>
&g
Hello all,
I am a little confused about subnetting. I read an article
in the linux journal. I later bought a book and it seems to
give quite a different picture of subnets.
First a quote from the book:
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 Unleashed
snip-
When subnetting, it's important to note
he ISP's net? Or are you allocating one of your
> > IP to your ISP's router?
Have you considered this question? It really _is_ a key point.
> If you could point me to a good resource on subnetting that
> would be very helpful.
Subnetting is included in these:
http://ww
Sibuyas Bombay wrote:
> I am using ppp to connect to my ISP, so that means xxx.33 will be my ppp0
> interface's IP rite ? What about my eth0 interface ? Will I also need to
> give
> it one IP of its own since its the only interface my LAN (of windoze
> puters)can
> directly see ?
Your pp
Hi !
Anyone have any idea how do I configure my debian box as a router for my
LAN?
Anyway, I'm planning to do this and please let me know if my thinking is
wrong.
I want to ask my ISP for 32 static IP's (203.176.38.32 - 203.176.38.64).
And I'll assign xxx.33 as my Linux's IP and let t
On Thu, 18 Sep 1997 15:36:01 -0500, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
>Kevin Traas wrote:
>>
>> >Hmmm. What's the netmask on the ethernet interface? If it's set to
>> >255.255.255.224 then everything should work fine even though
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>
>Then NT's routing algorithm is wrong or there are othe
Kevin Traas wrote:
>
> >Hmmm. What's the netmask on the ethernet interface? If it's set to
> >255.255.255.224 then everything should work fine even though
>
> Yes, it is.
Then NT's routing algorithm is wrong or there are other routes afoot.
Run netstat -r on the NT box to verify that the routes
>Hmmm. What's the netmask on the ethernet interface? If it's set to
>255.255.255.224 then everything should work fine even though
Yes, it is.
>the NT box sets 255.255.255.0 on the PPP link. This is because the
>routing algorithm chooses the route with the most matching bits (that
>is, the one wi
Kevin Traas wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply (and the info), Jens.
>
> Here's what I'm trying to do:
>
> I've got one assigned Class C - 206.182.236.0 - which I've split using a
> netmask of 255.255.255.224.
>
> I'm using one subnet of 206.182.236.32 for my local LAN. My Debian Linux
> box is
ptember 17, 1997 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: Incoming PPP question - subnetting
>Kevin Traas wrote:
>>
>> I'm having a problem configuring dialin PPP access on my system.
(Debian
>> 1.3.1, PPPD 2.2 pl0)
>>
>> I've allocated a subnet of addresses to the incoming line
Kevin Traas wrote:
>
> I'm having a problem configuring dialin PPP access on my system. (Debian
> 1.3.1, PPPD 2.2 pl0)
>
> I've allocated a subnet of addresses to the incoming lines and tried setting
> the subnet mask in /etc/ppp/options to "netmask 255.255.255.224"; however,
> my incoming clie
Kevin Traas wrote:
>
> I'm having a problem configuring dialin PPP access on my system. (Debian
> 1.3.1, PPPD 2.2 pl0)
>
> I've allocated a subnet of addresses to the incoming lines and tried setting
> the subnet mask in /etc/ppp/options to "netmask 255.255.255.224"; however,
> my incoming clie
I'm having a problem configuring dialin PPP access on my system. (Debian
1.3.1, PPPD 2.2 pl0)
I've allocated a subnet of addresses to the incoming lines and tried setting
the subnet mask in /etc/ppp/options to "netmask 255.255.255.224"; however,
my incoming clients have netmasks of 255.255.255.0
18 matches
Mail list logo
