Hi Joe,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:51:20PM -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Andy Smith writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Sébastien Gautrin wrote:
> >> The proof of this is that they all have nearly the exact same content (some
> >> add the list mail, some don't), all being HTML me
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:02:57 -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> From: pfeif...@cs.nmsu.edu
>>> It may come as a shock to you but most non-technical email users use
>>> HTML email.
>>
>>His point wasn"t that they"re all HTML, it"s that they have nearly
>>identical content and identically formatted HTML.
> A
Attached is a copy of the source on a page of the link in one of the last
spammers. It has a yes/no response for sharing pictures with the same
output of java variable. One of the tweeter accounts is @XhmikosR
which is Greek for ChemistR.
But, this site may be just a library for hacker code that is
From: pfeif...@cs.nmsu.edu
>> It may come as a shock to you but most non-technical email users use
>> HTML email.
>
>His point wasn"t that they"re all HTML, it"s that they have nearly
>identical content and identically formatted HTML.
And my point was that let's say they all came from wanadoo.fr fo
On Tue 11 Jul 2017 at 14:49:55 -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
[Opportunistic snipping in action]
> I do not have the capacity.
Out of the mouths of babes and sucklings. :)
(That's three more years of temporal punishment for me; answering
questions on GRUB, I suppose. But, please, not email etiquet
Andy Smith writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Sébastien Gautrin wrote:
>> The "stop your mail" and "PLEASE STOP YOUR MAILS" messages are definitely
>> not created by the owners of the email, though it might be done by a mobile
From: deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk
>On Tue 11 Jul 2017 at 11:12:35 (-0400), Fungi4All wrote:
>> > From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
> >>>On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:10:06PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> It may come as a shock to you but most non-technical email users use
> HTML email.
> >>>
> >>> As long
On Tue 11 Jul 2017 at 11:12:35 (-0400), Fungi4All wrote:
> > From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
> >>On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:10:06PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> >>> It may come as a shock to you but most non-technical email users use
> >>> HTML email.
> >>
> >> As long as they don"t do it *here* (or any ot
> From: wool...@eeg.ccf.org
>>On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:10:06PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
>>> It may come as a shock to you but most non-technical email users use
>>> HTML email.
>>
>> As long as they don"t do it *here* (or any other unix-oriented mailing
>> list), no problem.
You are shifting top
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:10:06PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> It may come as a shock to you but most non-technical email users use
> HTML email.
As long as they don't do it *here* (or any other unix-oriented mailing
list), no problem.
If the vast majority of junk comes from wanadoo.fr I am tempted to
think that it is a targeted effort to accumulate so many spam reports
for such email addresses that eventually the whole domain is considered
a spamers domain. Huge ISPs have been listed as spam sources this
way. To use an html temp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:10:06PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Sébastien Gautrin wrote:
[...]
> > The proof of this is that they all have nearly the exact same content (some
> > add the list mail,
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Sébastien Gautrin wrote:
> The "stop your mail" and "PLEASE STOP YOUR MAILS" messages are definitely
> not created by the owners of the email, though it might be done by a mobile
> app as suggested.
I've replied o
Original Message
Subject: Re: stop your mail
From: Andy Smith
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: 2017-07-09
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 07:50:38PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
These messages are the spam, themselves. The pretend "leave me
alone" prologue
On 2017-07-09 at 07:32 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> The spammers' motivation is to use an address that is not associated
> with them but is a real address so cannot be easily blocked on the
> basis of from address alone.
Not just a real address, but an address belonging to a popular mailing
list. If
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
>
> Joel Rees wrote:
>> (1) These messages may be a sort of generator for phishing targets.
>
> You mean that those who hit the "Smack Sender" button of their mail
> app show up as flotsam here and can be harvested without reveili
> From: scdbac...@gmx.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> this conversation has gone viral itself.
> It is technically interesting to see what people think how stupid we
> are. I wonder if there is any other purpose than to make me wonder ?
Politically, the motive may be by some who will nee
Hi,
Fungi4All wrote:
> I remember 2 months ago I had received a response from what appeared
> as a list member responding to some spam that was sent by me to the list.
The first thing i checked on the current spam was that it is really
distributed by the list and not sent to me directly.
"Receive
Can I suggest two possibilities not apparently being considered?
(1) These messages may be a sort of generator for phishing targets.
(This is not currently a likely scenario, but you want to consider it.)
(2) These might be either the body of a message sent by a spatter
steganography technique, o
> UTC Time: July 9, 2017 9:41 AM
> From: scdbac...@gmx.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Hi,
> Andy Smith wrote:
>> I don"t think they care who receives the blowback.
> Just for sports i bet on the intention to annoy us and possibly the
> reflector mailers.
> (I am still undecided whether th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 11:41:29AM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andy Smith wrote:
> > I don't think they care who receives the blowback.
>
> Just for sports i bet on the intention to annoy us and possibly the
> reflector mailers.
> (I am st
Hi,
Andy Smith wrote:
> I don't think they care who receives the blowback.
Just for sports i bet on the intention to annoy us and possibly the
reflector mailers.
(I am still undecided whether the reflectors are real.)
I am subscribed to several lists. Among them only debian-user gets
this specia
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 07:50:38PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> These messages are the spam, themselves. The pretend "leave me
> alone" prologue is just to disguise that status and attract your
> attention until you read the quoted text.
I think it is far more likely that these people ar
Le decadi 20 messidor, an CCXXV, Thomas Schmitt a écrit :
> But then why don't we ever see the original messages to which
> the alleged repliers raise protest ?
Because they do not exist, of course. These messages are the spam,
themselves. The pretend "leave me alone" prologue is just to disguise
Hi,
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Either someone has managed to force-subscribe them to the list
The messages don't have "LDOSUBSCRIBER" in their "X-Spam-Status:"
headers. This indicates that the sender's mail address is not
subscribed. The sender as person might be subscribed by a different
address
On 8 July 2017 at 16:52, Fungi4All wrote:
>
> From: scdbac...@gmx.net
>
> Hi,
> (Can real people be that stupid ? Is this the proof for
> brain damage caused by mobile phones ?)
>
>
> Look at how many people are NOT protesting the G20, or
> the earth's summit of earth destroyers. This is how bad
> From: scdbac...@gmx.net
> Hi,
> (Can real people be that stupid ? Is this the proof for
> brain damage caused by mobile phones ?)
Look at how many people are NOT protesting the G20, or
the earth's summit of earth destroyers. This is how bad this
epidemic of IQ drainage has gotten. It is all suck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jamie White wrote:
> > The correct unsubscribe procedue is [...]
>
> I am very sure that the protest raising people are _not_ subscribed
> to debian-user@lists.debian.org . If
Hi,
Jamie White wrote:
> The correct unsubscribe procedue is [...]
I am very sure that the protest raising people are _not_ subscribed
to debian-user@lists.debian.org . If they are real at all, then they
got spam with our list as fake sender or as fake receiver of replies.
If ever, then this is
Hi
The correct unsubscribe procedue is to go here:
https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe
Jamie
On Saturday, July 8, 2017, PM wrote:
>
>
> I do not want to be in your mailing list anymore. Please delete my email
> address from your list. Stop your mails Thanks again
>
--
Jamie
I do not want to be in your mailing list anymore. Please delete my email
address from your list. Stop your mails Thanks again
ineering Branch
WSR-88D Operational Support Facility
(405)366-6520 x4237
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
> From: Unix System Manager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Russell Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Plse stop your mail server process!
> Date: Thursday, February
32 matches
Mail list logo
