> That you can provide such detail and yet not use the tool yourself.
>
> Hugo
> >> Do you run shorewall?
> >
> > Not at all.
Hugo, despite being complex in appearance shorewall is 'easy' to set up for a
strong
firewall with example files provided with the installation. The installation
can
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:13:10 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
Mmm, this is done from "/etc/default/shorewall" by editing the
"startup" variable, that you have to set to "1" as it says.
>>> Impresive.
>>
>> What's what you find "impressive"?
>>
>>
> That you can prov
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:43:53 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 29 apr 12, 18:53:11, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>>
>> In /doc/shorewall-core there's nothing about this In
>> /doc/shorewall-doc/ there are subfolders of HTML and HTML/images and
>> manpages in great abundance but no README. In /usr/s
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:13:36 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the
command line: e.g. #sh
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:13:36 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>>
>>> After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
>>> configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the
>>> command line: e.g. #sho
On Du, 29 apr 12, 18:53:11, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
> In /doc/shorewall-core there's nothing about this
> In /doc/shorewall-doc/ there are subfolders of HTML and HTML/images and
> manpages in great abundance but no README.
> In /usr/share/shorewall there are subfolders of Shorewall and config fil
Brian pointed out:
> Incidentally, shorewall has had 'startup=0' since Lenny at least. You
> probably forgot that you must have altered the default sometime in the
> past and didn't think the README in /usr/share/doc worth a glance.
> Also, /etc/default/shorewall is a conffile so if indeed the upg
On Sun 29 Apr 2012 at 15:30:28 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 22:20:02 +0200
> hvw59601 wrote:
>
> > Camaleón wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> > >
> > >> After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
> > >> configurat
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 22:20:02 +0200
hvw59601 wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> >
> >> After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
> >> configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command
> >> line: e.g.
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:30:02 +0200
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
> > After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
> > configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command
> > line: e.g. #shorewall start.
> >
>
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command
line: e.g. #shorewall start.
I can't find where this problem can be corrected in the
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:48:58 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous
> configuration files, Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command
> line: e.g. #shorewall start.
>
> I can't find where this problem can be corrected in the
> etc/sh
After the recent Shorewall upgrade that replaced the previous configuration
files,
Shorewall now only starts 'manually' at the command line: e.g. #shorewall start.
I can't find where this problem can be corrected in the
etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
What changed in the upgrade that now prevents
I have recently installed the Debian ALSA 0.90rc6 packages from Debian
Testing for the 2.4.19-k7 kernel. Everything seems to be working fine,
but I get a message on startup about "no sound cards defined". I do get
sound out of the CDROM, and all other sound sources (except midi) that I
have o
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 10:41, Dave Whiteley wrote:
> Help please,
>
> I am using xdm and icewm, (but I suspect that my problem relates to
> other window managers as well). I start up several applications at
> login, using .xsession but these all start up in the first virtual
> screen. Is there any
On 25-Jun-2002 Dave Whiteley wrote:
> Help please,
>
> I am using xdm and icewm, (but I suspect that my problem relates to
> other window managers as well). I start up several applications at
> login, using .xsession but these all start up in the first virtual
> screen. Is there any way in which
Help please,
I am using xdm and icewm, (but I suspect that my problem relates to
other window managers as well). I start up several applications at
login, using .xsession but these all start up in the first virtual
screen. Is there any way in which I can start them in other screens.
My .xsession
ephan Hachinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: 386-4 MB startup question
> Actually, probably 8 would be best, just in case there were mismatch
> problems. (our old
> 4 + your new 4 might cause some kind of mismatch problem, in which case we
ginal Message -
From: "DSC Lithuania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephan Hachinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: 386-4 MB startup question
> >Hello!
> >
> >The parity message doesn't seem like a real
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 11:01:40AM -0500, DSC Lithuania wrote:
> >From your Debian 2.2 documentation, it looks like 2.2 requires a minimum of
> >12 MB of Ram.
Right. But there's a work-around. Install some earlier release (e.g. slink
(2.1 as far as I remember) and upgrade using:
apt-get update
a
ndle pnp cards?
Regards,
Stephan Hachinger from Munich, Germany
- Original Message -
From: "Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DSC Lithuania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 2:16 AM
Subject: Re: 386-4 MB startup question
> DSC L
DSC Lithuania wrote:
> Does anyone have a suggestion on what I can do to get this system up and
> running? I am hoping to get this successfully installed on the computer that
> hasn't run before, because that becomes an increase in our assets without
> additional risk.
Have you thought about r
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 11:01:40AM -0500, DSC Lithuania wrote:
:Hi,
:
:I have an old copy of Debian 1.3.1 on CD, and can also download whatever I
need.
That said, my first debian install was on a 386 4M/RAM 375M/HDD, about
two years ago (I'll try and get a version number or release name), I
d
Hi,
I have an old copy
of Debian 1.3.1 on CD, and can also download whatever I need.
We are trying to set up an old 4-MB,
386 system (described below) with Linux, to use it as a mini-email
server for a Windows 95/98 ethernet
network. We are in Lithuania, which means that there is a
I have a slink system, with 2.2.10, and until earlier today it was
running fine. I rebooted the system to windows so a friend could play
some games, and of course windows froze twice. Both times he missed
lilo and it booted into linux. He ctrl-alt-deleted during the startup
stuff, and it ran the
25 matches
Mail list logo
