Hello,
I have a system running Debian Testing. It was freshly installed from
the stable net-installer image then immediately upgraded to testing. I
then installed xfce4 and configured it to start from console as per
these[1] instructions. However, when I run `startx`, I get some output
from it (th
Ivan,
> I guess that the inittab(5) entry in question is only started
> after rc.local finishes. Therefore, starting startx(1) in the
> background may help.
That was it. Adding "&" at the end of the command in rc.local did the
trick! Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > Tech Geek writes:
> > However, I want to do a auto login into my fluxbox (instead of user
> > typing in username and password in xdm) and I still want the basic
> > login console on Serial Port 1. So I removed xdm package (apt-get
> > purge xdm) and added the following l
> Tech Geek writes:
[…]
> However, I want to do a auto login into my fluxbox (instead of user
> typing in username and password in xdm) and I still want the basic
> login console on Serial Port 1. So I removed xdm package (apt-get
> purge xdm) and added the following line to my /etc/rc.l
> suspicious that I am compelled to ask if you are really sure that is
> the correlation? Please double check.
Yes, I double checked that. As soon as I revert back to installing
xdm, the login console appears on Serial Port 1.
> Are there any messaged logged to /var/log/syslog concerning failure
Tech Geek wrote:
> I have uncommented the following line in the /etc/inittab file on
> Debian Squeeze:
>
> T0:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L ttyS0 9600 vt100
Seems reasonable. I do that on server systems too.
> This works if my system starts up normally i.e. via xdm->fluxbox.
Sure.
> However, I wa
I have uncommented the following line in the /etc/inittab file on
Debian Squeeze:
T0:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L ttyS0 9600 vt100
Basically, I am trying to output a login console on Serial Port 1
also. This works if my system starts up normally i.e. via
xdm->fluxbox. However, I want to do a auto lo
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 00:58 -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here's what happening.
>
> After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
>
> After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)
>
> A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
> still gets me back t
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:14:56AM +0300, Rares Aioanei wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:58:21 -1000
> Joel Roth wrote:
>
> [...]
> What video card/driver are you using?
> --
> Rares Aioanei
The card is:
lspci | grep -i radeon
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RS780MC [Ra
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:58:21 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
[...]
What video card/driver are you using?
--
Rares Aioanei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 08:37:55PM +0100, Angus Hedger wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:20:51 -1000
> Joel Roth wrote:
> > Thanks for checking this out!
> >
> > Console *does* VT switching correctly under a stock 2.6.31-1-amd64
> > kernel. (But for some reason suspend doesn't work... wil
Hey,
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:20:51 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
> Thanks for checking this out!
>
> Console *does* VT switching correctly under a stock 2.6.31-1-amd64
> kernel. (But for some reason suspend doesn't work... will try a later
> kernel.)
>
> Why didn't I think of this? Probably because the
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 07:04:58PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sb, 04 sep 10, 09:06:23, Stephen Powell wrote:
> >
> > Nice work, Andrei!
>
> Not fair, you did the heavy lifting :)
Both deserving of a beer, if not a pizza as well,
to be collectible at some future FTF.
-j
> Regards,
> Andr
On Sb, 04 sep 10, 09:06:23, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> Nice work, Andrei!
Not fair, you did the heavy lifting :)
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
le version of 1.17.0,
>> [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.[dri] If using legacy
>> modesetting, upgrade your kernel.
>> [dri] If using kernel modesetting, make sure your module is
>> [dri] loaded prior to starting X, and that this driver was built
>> [
l module version of 1.17.0,
> > [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.[dri] If using legacy
> > modesetting, upgrade your kernel.
> > [dri] If using kernel modesetting, make sure your module is
> > [dri] loaded prior to starting X, and that this driver was built
&
, upgrade your kernel.
> [dri] If using kernel modesetting, make sure your module is
> [dri] loaded prior to starting X, and that this driver was built
> [dri] with support for KMS.
> [dri] Disabling DRI.
This, combined with the fact that you are running a self-compiled kernel
would
el ClockPLL Frequency Input: 13500
(II) RADEON(0): Minimum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Input: 1000
(II) RADEON(0): Maximum Pixel Clock: 40
(II) RADEON(0): Reference Clock: 14320
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:05.0
drmOpenDevice: node name is
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:32:12 -0400 (EDT), Joel Roth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Aha! failed to load firmware! That may be your problem. You should
>> always follow up on such messages. Do you have package
>> firmware-linux-nonfree
>> installed?
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:57:59 -0400 (EDT), Joel Roth wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, here is my dmesg output regarding my ATI Radeon 3100 chip (RS780MC).
> > I wonder about the 'loading firmware' bit, which seems to fail.
> >
> > [ 1478.948761
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:57:59 -0400 (EDT), Joel Roth wrote:
>
> FWIW, here is my dmesg output regarding my ATI Radeon 3100 chip (RS780MC).
> I wonder about the 'loading firmware' bit, which seems to fail.
>
> [ 1478.833236] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> [ 1478.934354] [drm] radeon kernel
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:22:17PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:58:21AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Here's what happening.
> >
> > After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
> >
> > After startx: small console font (maybe 132 charac
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:58:21AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here's what happening.
>
> After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
>
> After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)
>
> A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
> still gets me
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:58:21AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here's what happening.
>
> After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
>
> After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)
>
> A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
> still gets me
Hello all,
Here's what happening.
After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)
A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
still gets me back to X)
This problem appeared soon after converting to
dependency-based b
Hi everybody,
Please, CC: me, as I am not subscribed to the list.
I am running Debian sid on an Apple iMac 27", with a Mobility Radeon HD
4850 video card (ATI Technologies Inc M98L). The kernel I use is
2.6.33-2 from experimental, and I have disable KMS.
Depending on the version of the radeon dr
Hi,
I installed Lenny on my ThinkPad R51. It has an Intel 82852/855GM
graphics card. After executing startx the LCD goes 100% bright. Same
thing happens if I wake up the LCD from sleep (xset +dpms). My Fn +
Home/End keys work fine and i can adjust the brightness. But its
annoying to do it ever
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> [pparis...@spartacos][~]$
> id -a
> uid=1000(pparissis) gid=1000(pparissis)
> groups=4(adm),20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),34(backup),40(src),44(video),46(plugdev),1000(pparissis)
> [pparis...@spartacos][~]$ which xvidtune
> /usr/bin/xvidt
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:06:48 -0800 (PST)
S D wrote:
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>
> > You don't need root access in order to run that
> > command.
>
> True, but if I run it as a regular user, it gets even funnier:
>
> $ which xvidtune
> /usr/bin/xvidtune
> $ `which xvidtune`
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> You don't need root access in order to run that
> command.
True, but if I run it as a regular user, it gets even funnier:
$ which xvidtune
/usr/bin/xvidtune
$ `which xvidtune`
Please install the program before using
$ /usr/bin/xvidtune
Please instal
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:08:26 -0800 (PST)
S D wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, pavlos.paris wrote:
>
> > Try the following
> > 1) inside GNOME/KDE open a terminal and run
> > xvidtune and tune the settings
> > as you wish. Then click on show button, this will
> > print on the terminal th
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, pavlos.paris wrote:
> Try the following
> 1) inside GNOME/KDE open a terminal and run
> xvidtune and tune the settings
> as you wish. Then click on show button, this will
> print on the terminal the setting to be used in
> xorg.conf.
Weird, when I try to run (as root)
2009/2/17 S D
>
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
> > For the "ati" module, you need the package:
> > p xserver-xorg-video-ati - X.Org X server --
> > ATI display driver
>
> Installed the xserver-xorg-video-ati package and it did resolve the issue
> somewhat. I w
I recall seeing something along that line in the , known issues after
installing Lenny , in the install notes. about the display not using all the
screen, they had a fix for it also.
thanks
Norm
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:13 AM, S D wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wr
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Probably need to add some modes or modelines to your
> xorg.conf. Might try
> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg (or sth like that) to get the
> resolution you
> want.
I checked xorg.conf, it already has 1600x1200 line entries. Besides, the K
On Monday 16 February 2009 21:58:13 S D wrote:
> The picture now, for some reason, doesn't use the whole available screen
> space but leave unused areas about 3-5 cm from the left, right, top and
> bottom monitor edges. It looks something like this:
>
> I usually run my monitor in 1600x1200 mode an
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> For the "ati" module, you need the package:
> p xserver-xorg-video-ati - X.Org X server --
> ATI display driver
Installed the xserver-xorg-video-ati package and it did resolve the issue
somewhat. I was able to start X and KDE, KD
On Monday 16 February 2009 16:13:29 S D wrote:
> (EE) Failed to load module "ait" (module doesn't exist, 0)
For the "ati" module, you need the package:
p xserver-xorg-video-ati - X.Org X server -- ATI display driver
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasu
After dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, I'm trying to run lenny using 2.6.18
kernel that I have left over from etch, as I'm having issues assembling mdadm
RAID drives under the new 2.6.28 lenny kernel (For more info see
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.user/browse_thread/thread/b97fd9
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:41:41PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:15:55PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > > I have this odd phenomenon, which I suspect indicates some sort of attack.
> > >
> > > After I start
On 10/8/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:15:55PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > I have this odd phenomenon, which I suspect indicates some sort of attack.
> >
> > After I start X, when I return to a console (with Ctl-Alt-Fx) there's
> > what looks like
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:15:55PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I have this odd phenomenon, which I suspect indicates some sort of attack.
>
> After I start X, when I return to a console (with Ctl-Alt-Fx) there's
> what looks like a little package sitting in the bottom, right-hand
> quarter of
Hello:
I have this odd phenomenon, which I suspect indicates some sort of attack.
After I start X, when I return to a console (with Ctl-Alt-Fx) there's
what looks like a little package sitting in the bottom, right-hand
quarter of my screen. After I Alt-7 back to X, and then Ctl-Alt-Fx
back to a
libre fan wrote:
libre fan wrote:
Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I
rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range
I reconfigured several times trying to correct errors, and I compared the
original Xfree config file with the present
errors in the log file still the message out of scan range
is displayed after I type startx.
Your help would be much appreciated!
cheers,
libre fan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/starting-X-fails%3A-out-of-scan-range-tf2330274.html#a6633861
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
screen.
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/starting-X-fails%3A-out-of-scan-range-tf2330274.html#a6499854
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libre fan wrote:
Hello,
I have a Debian Etch+Sid and Xubuntu Dapper dual-boot.
Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I
rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range
Though X is started (I typed startx on a terminal) Wdm (my display
manager)
stall x.org, reinstall it
from the Etch repositories?
There must be a simpler way. Run xorg config?
Many thanks in advance!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/starting-X-fails%3A-out-of-scan-range-tf2330274.html#a6482623
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archi
continuing blog
i installed the x-server from woody, x starts up fine now, jeej!
i guess this issue is closed, unless this was a bad idea.
Thx for reading my ramblings,
Jeroen
On 06 Sep 2005, at 21:06, jeroen wrote:
This is starting to look like a blog ;)
I installed the kernel found on the
This is starting to look like a blog ;)
I installed the kernel found on the previously mentioned page (http://
gefechtsdienst.de/uman/c1ve-general.html).
It doesn't look really nice. Full screen console is built in but is
shifted (not placed correctly, with white band down the screen).
Start
Could have found what's causing the issue. I have no idea what he's
talking about though...
Looking in to it now, but any help is appreciated.
Jeroen
--- start quote ---
Framebuffer/X notes
New - I managed to replace the atyfb code of 2.4.27 with the one of
2.4.16. This means there
Sorry if this came in double, the resend i did might have tricked
your mail rules (it did trick mine)
Jeroen
On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote:
I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I
think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works.
#gdm
returns
On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote:
I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I
think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works.
#gdm
returns a "command not found"
On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:25, Kent West wrote:
jeroen wrote:
I used apt to get me the fil
Kent West wrote:
>jeroen wrote:
>
>
>>With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a
>>window manager
>>
>>
>
>I don't think so; this looks like a video sync -type issue.
>
>
You can double-check this possibility by installing another wm
("aptitude install icewm", etc
jeroen wrote:
> I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i
> did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still have to
> after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).
Take a look at "/etc/network/interfaces" (also "man interfaces" for
examples). Once con
jeroen wrote:
Hello all,
--intro
I'm trying (finally) to get debian to work on my Vaio PCG-C1VE.
Using the latest version of the installer (floppy images) i succeeded
in installing 3.1 on the little b*st*rd. Previous versions didn't
support USB disks (at least not on a noob level) so t
Hello all,
--intro
I'm trying (finally) to get debian to work on my Vaio PCG-C1VE.
Using the latest version of the installer (floppy images) i succeeded
in installing 3.1 on the little b*st*rd. Previous versions didn't
support USB disks (at least not on a noob level) so thx debian!
I u
On 27 July 2005, Kent West wrote:
>
> > [EE] xf860 penserial: cannot open device /dev/input/miceno such
> > device
> > [EE] configured mouse: cannot open input device
> > [EE] PreInit failed for input device "Configured Mouse"
> >
> > I have a 5$ optical mouse that is made by MicroInnovation
Dylan Evans wrote:
> when I typed "startx" at the command prompt, it made the same error
> messages it did initially,
> [EE] xf860 penserial: cannot open device /dev/input/miceno such
> device
> [EE] configured mouse: cannot open input device
> [EE] PreInit failed for input device "Configur
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 17:08 +, Adrian S. Glover wrote:
> Hello!
> Adrian
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Adrian,
in case of a misconfigured xserver you can do a couple of things
that all come to basically the same thing: modifying
your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 This is your central xserver config
ndicating that this
box has two video cards (yours probably (almost certainly) only has
one); one is an S3 86c325; the other is an ATI Rage 128.
Now that you know what video chipset you have, run "dpkg-reconfigure
xserver-xfree86", and select the corresponding driver for your chipset
Hello!
I'm new to Debian and this GNU/linux. I've
installed from CD but the machine returns an error saying "I cannot start x
server, it is likely that it is not set up correctly etc etc".
Then next screen says "warning process set to nice
value 0 instead of -10 as requested etc".
Next
cfk wrote:
I admit that my experience is with RedHat, so I dont know yet how to change
back and forth between a text logon, a kde logon or a gnome logon in Debian.
So, I cannot get back to the startx prompt at this time to experiment.
You can search the Debian archives; this has been covered man
> tasksel helps a lot with this. You're probably still missing a display
> manager from your Red Hat experience. Since you're into KDE, I suggest
> kdm. Though, being a GNOME geek, I also have to point out that GDM is
> much better ;-)
>
> --
> Best Regards, | This signature is currently under
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 12:18:14PM +0100, Sebastian Kapfer wrote:
> Since you're into KDE, I suggest kdm. Though, being a GNOME geek, I
> also have to point out that GDM is much better ;-)
maybe we need an uber-display manager that lets the user choose what
display manager they want to use before
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:59:01PM -0800, cfk wrote:
> On Saturday 18 December 2004 18:14, Sam Watkins wrote:
> Dear Sam:
> Thank you very much for the tip. I did do a 'apt-get install
> x-window-system', and a number of good things happened. I can now do a startx
> and get twm. I can also
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 04:00:12 +0100, cfk wrote:
> after a search of archives and it seems to be working. After that, I wonder
> what the incantation is to start kde and perhaps more importantly, where I
> can go to figure out a few steps after that, other then googling.
tasksel helps a lot with
Hello
cfk (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Thank you very much for the tip. I did do a 'apt-get install
> x-window-system', and a number of good things happened. I can now do a
> startx and get twm. I can also right-click and get a tclsh8.4.
>
> Thats the good news. Unfortunately, being unfamiliar
On Saturday 18 December 2004 18:14, Sam Watkins wrote:
> startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients.
>
> You should:
>
> apt-get install x-window-system-core
>
> or probably:
>
> apt-get install x-window-system
>
>
> you can look at what each of these "meta packages
Sam Watkins wrote:
startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients.
You should:
apt-get install x-window-system-core
or probably:
apt-get install x-window-system
you can look at what each of these "meta packages" depends on with:
apt-cache show x-window-system-core
you
startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients.
You should:
apt-get install x-window-system-core
or probably:
apt-get install x-window-system
you can look at what each of these "meta packages" depends on with:
apt-cache show x-window-system-core
you can see re
On Saturday 18 December 2004 17:42, Robert Vangel wrote:
> cfk wrote:
> > Gentlemen:
> > Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for a
> > few years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly
> > installed "Sarge" to start X.
> >
> > I try the incanta
cfk wrote:
Gentlemen:
Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for a few
years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly installed
"Sarge" to start X.
I try the incantation "startx" from either a user or root command prompt and
get "command not found".
On Saturday 18 December 2004 5:44 pm, cfk wrote:
> Gentlemen:
> Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat
for a few
> years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly
installed
> "Sarge" to start X.
Searching through the archives would have told you you n
Gentlemen:
Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for
a few
years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly installed
"Sarge" to start X.
I try the incantation "startx" from either a user or root command
prompt and
get "command not fou
Some sites tell me to do things like
Please add the following line to the ~/.xsession or ~/.xinitrc.
export [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exec uim-xim&
But in Debian, neither ~/.xsession nor ~/.xinitrc exist by default. And
if you create them, you cannot use them for *adding* things to the X
start-
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:08:39AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:56 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
>
> > Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp
> > switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble,
> > running tcpdump when X s
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:56 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp
> switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble,
> running tcpdump when X startx shows the name lookup BTW:
>
you know, I think we're barking up the
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:49:29AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
>
> >
> > BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase
> > on this:
> >
> > [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
> > interface to
Incoming from Steven Satelle:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> >
> > [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
> > interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design.
> >
> > The problem is that it seems that a few other things seem
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
>
> BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase
> on this:
>
> [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
> interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design.
>
> The problem
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:06:41AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
> > Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the
> > nameserver is not reachable then ping works but
> > host returns
> > 192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable
> > Nameserver not reachable
> > litshi.luna.loc
> Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the
> nameserver is not reachable then ping works but
> host returns
> 192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable
> Nameserver not reachable
> litshi.luna.local A record not found, try again
> my /etc/hosts has the following lines:
>
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:53:09 +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>>
>> no, its caused by the machine trying to resolve its name over eth0
>> AFAIR. If the network is up. If you've configured the network, you've
>> set a hostname, so it is trying to re
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:33:15PM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> > --- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> >
> >> I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
> >> if anyone else experiences it too.
> >
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> --- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
>
>> I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
>> if anyone else experiences it too.
>
> Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed
> ther
--- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
> if anyone else experiences it too.
Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed
there, then maybe consider filing one.
-- Thomas Adam
=
"The Linux
I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
if anyone else experiences it too.
When starting X with a configured network and no cable, it hangs for
about 30 seconds until it starts (which is consistent with network
timeouts). If I disable the network or not conf
Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
What you told us you have . . .
display adapter - rage 128 pro gl
What you've told X you have . . .
Section "Device"
Identifier "Generic Video Card"
Driver "i810"
VideoRam 8192
Option "UseFBDev" "true"
EndSection
What does "lspci" say you have?
You might try
Hello
Sandip P Deshmukh (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> firstly, i am not a member of the group. so, may i request you to send
> your replies to my e-mail address also?
>
> [XFree does not start with ATI rage 128 pr GL]
>
>(II) I810: Driver for Intel i810 chipset: i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815
>
hello all
firstly, i am not a member of the group. so, may i request you to send
your replies to my e-mail address also?
i have a hp pc running win xp. it has an hp72 monitor.
from control panel - device managers following information is available.
monitor - hp d 8904
display adapter - rage 1
> Tom Allison wrote:
> Do you perhaps have two video cards in the system? Or is the G400
> dual-headed?
>
No... Just one G400, single head.
>> After this completed, I rebooted (new kernel) and was able to start up
>> xdm (did not start automatically).
>
> Odd that it did not start automatically
Tom Allison wrote:
I did an install using the sarge install cd last night. I installed
the minimum software necessary. This went fine.
Then I ran TaskSel and selected only the X-Window-Server.
Initially there was an autodetect made of my hardware, including my
video card, all of which went fine.
I did an install using the sarge install cd last night.
Initially I was working on a very small installation because of my plans
on setting up LVM.
I installed the minimum software necessary.
installed lvm10 using 'apt-get install lvm10'
set up lvm disks.
This went fine.
Then I ran TaskSel and s
Which XF86config file? When dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 is
run, it writes to /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
You'll also notice that in /etc/X11/XF86Config there is only one
entry, regarding naming the input device, but in
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 there exists all t
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:53:42PM +, navaja wrote:
> navaja wrote:
> i noticed that dpkg-reconfigure didnt seem to update
> the XF86config file, even though i ran it several times, thats why this
> error
> kept showing up.
Which XF86config file? When dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
on Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:38:16PM +, navaja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hi,
>
> i boot up, and get command prompt login. can use all vitual termninals.
> then i start x, with "startx" (with login manager i get the same
> problem). x starts, then i try to go back to a virtual terminal, and
navaja wrote:
hi,
i boot up, and get command prompt login. can use all vitual termninals.
then i start x, with "startx" (with login manager i get the same
problem). x starts, then i try to go back to a virtual terminal, and all
i see is messed up lines going down my screen.
thanks
And what
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:38:16PM +, navaja wrote:
> hi,
>
> i boot up, and get command prompt login. can use all vitual termninals.
> then i start x, with "startx" (with login manager i get the same
> problem). x starts, then i try to go back to a virtual terminal, and all
> i see is mess
hi,
i boot up, and get command prompt login. can use all vitual termninals.
then i start x, with "startx" (with login manager i get the same
problem). x starts, then i try to go back to a virtual terminal, and all
i see is messed up lines going down my screen.
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
