Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-12-01 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:16:04PM -0800, aphro wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Eric G . Miller wrote: > > egm2 >Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. Any > egm2 >idea what the patch applies to? Perhaps I'm not using whatever it is > egm2 >that breaks it. > > from what i

Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-11-30 Thread J Horacio MG
> Bernhard Rieder said: > > "Eric G . Miller" wrote: > > Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. Any > > idea what the patch applies to? Perhaps I'm not using whatever it is > > that breaks it. > > Maybe this applies only to SO 5.1 (from StarDivision) and not to > SO 5.

Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-11-30 Thread aphro
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Eric G . Miller wrote: egm2 >Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. Any egm2 >idea what the patch applies to? Perhaps I'm not using whatever it is egm2 >that breaks it. from what i got off the mailing list (see kt.linuxcare.com) it had to do with th

Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-11-30 Thread Randy Edwards
> Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. What's really strange is that I've got this machine which SO 5.1a works great on. In my laptop, however (and which I need for a presentation day after tomorrow which I did in SO!), StarOffice errors. Both boxes run the lat

Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-11-30 Thread Bernhard Rieder
"Eric G . Miller" wrote: > Well, I have potato with 2.2.13 and StarOffice working fine here. Any > idea what the patch applies to? Perhaps I'm not using whatever it is > that breaks it. Maybe this applies only to SO 5.1 (from StarDivision) and not to SO 5.1a from Sun but I'm not sure about (I have

Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-11-30 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 08:12:32AM -0800, aphro wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, J Horacio MG wrote: > > I believe the patch i mentioned (from kt.linuxcare.com) doesn't *yet* > exist as far as i know, SO should work with 2.2.10 although i bet > 2.2.13 would break it (i have SO working on slink on 2.2

Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-11-30 Thread Ed Cogburn
aphro wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, J Horacio MG wrote: > > homega >aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something about a patch. How do I > apply > homega >a patch to the kernel? I mean, just by: > > I believe the patch i mentioned (from kt.linuxcare.com) doesn't *yet* > exist as far as i know,

Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-11-29 Thread aphro
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, J Horacio MG wrote: homega >aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something about a patch. How do I apply homega >a patch to the kernel? I mean, just by: I believe the patch i mentioned (from kt.linuxcare.com) doesn't *yet* exist as far as i know, SO should work with 2.2.10 althou

Re: staroffice, potato (patching the kernel)

1999-11-29 Thread J Horacio MG
aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I installed Star Office 5.1 in the /opt directory as root with the > setup option /net. > > Then I ran setup as normal user from the /opt/ > directory and the > setup program installed basic files in my home directory. > That's all, no problems under potato with 2.2.1