On 04/11/2014 02:56 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
8< snip
Thus my question:
Is it possible to use debmirror, to mirror stable,testing,sid as well
as debian-security for stable and testing, and have them all share the
same package pool?
I can't see it, and I'm hoping I am simply not
On 11/04/14 15:25, Lisi Reisz wrote:
("One" is very clumsy in
> English, but in this case I felt that the second person would appear
> to target Zenaan.)
Best Queen's English, Lisi ;)
--
Tony van der Hoff | mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org
Ariège, France |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Friday 11 April 2014 03:46:49 Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> In my foggy memory, that at least for debian stable, I seem to
> remember something about security updates all get collected up,
> possibly with other updates (??) and they become the next stable
> point release.
Erm... No! I can accept th
On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> Thus my question:
>> Is it possible to use debmirror, to mirror stable,testing,sid as well
>> as debian-security for stable and testing, and have them all share the
>> same package pool?
>
On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Thus my question:
> Is it possible to use debmirror, to mirror stable,testing,sid as well
> as debian-security for stable and testing, and have them all share the
> same package pool?
In particular, for example, I stopped my initial debian-secu
lap between the debian-security package pool, and the
normal debian stable/testing pools.
Thus my question:
Is it possible to use debmirror, to mirror stable,testing,sid as well
as debian-security for stable and testing, and have them all share the
same package pool?
I can't see it, and I'
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> Well, this might actually be your problem, try downgrading to 4.4.5-8
> from Squeeze. Apparently the experimental libstdc++6 version does not
> work with Lenny's glibcš.
That worked to get me moving forward again. I had to install
gcc-base-
On 2011-02-02 19:21 +0100, Brad Alexander wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2011-02-02 18:42 +0100, Brad Alexander wrote:
>>
>>> I may have just shot myself in the foot, but I decided to go ahead and
>>> upgrade my wife's machine. It was running stable (lenny atm
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-02 18:42 +0100, Brad Alexander wrote:
>
>> I may have just shot myself in the foot, but I decided to go ahead and
>> upgrade my wife's machine. It was running stable (lenny atm) and I
>> wanted to get it to testing. Its running trin
On 2011-02-02 18:42 +0100, Brad Alexander wrote:
> I may have just shot myself in the foot, but I decided to go ahead and
> upgrade my wife's machine. It was running stable (lenny atm) and I
> wanted to get it to testing. Its running trinity as well.
>
> So I updated the apt-conf to
>
> APT::Defau
I may have just shot myself in the foot, but I decided to go ahead and
upgrade my wife's machine. It was running stable (lenny atm) and I
wanted to get it to testing. Its running trinity as well.
So I updated the apt-conf to
APT::Default-Release "testing";
(My base sources.list includes links fo
p server and some
> other server-services.
>
> Of course I'm using Debian as the OS.
>
> I'm just not sure whether to use stable, testing or unstable.
>
If you can use stable its probably a better choice. On my home firewall
I setup stable. It doesn't need much u
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
I've recently acquired a 2nd hand PC I want to use as a web server.
Now, finally, here's my question:
What version would you recommend? And, of course, why?
stable
Because it's, well, stable. And that's presumably what you want in a server.
If you find you can't stand it
;t intend to leave a keyboard and monitor connected to it.
Maybe later I'll want to experiment with a ftp server and some
other server-services.
Of course I'm using Debian as the OS.
I'm just not sure whether to use stable, testing or unstable.
Stable (woody) is, you know, stable, whi
somebody said:
>>>systems every day. I've been doing it on about 10 systems for about 2
>>>years, and haven't had a lot of trouble; indeed once my mail servers
>>> went
>>>down for a few hours for that reason, but my mail servers are always
>>> looking
>>>for an excuse to go down.
Use ssh-agent, a
Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Wed, May 19, 2004 at 08:07:46PM -0400, David Gaudine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
and if ththeresroblem with MTMTApgrade ?:)
True, now and then I have to count the subject lines to make sure all
systems are accounted for. But it's still better than logging in to all the
sys
on Wed, May 19, 2004 at 08:07:46PM -0400, David Gaudine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > and if ththeresroblem with MTMTApgrade ?:)
>
> True, now and then I have to count the subject lines to make sure all
> systems are accounted for. But it's still better than logging in to all the
> systems every
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:19:29AM -0500, Michael Kahle wrote:
Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:14 AM Colin Watson wrote:
I *strongly* recommend against upgrading by cron job. Just don't do
it; there are lots of ways it can break.
I have heard this m
> and if ththeresroblem with MTMTApgrade ?:)
True, now and then I have to count the subject lines to make sure all
systems are accounted for. But it's still better than logging in to all the
systems every day. I've been doing it on about 10 systems for about 2
years, and haven't had a lot of tro
--- David GaGaudinedadavidmemclaboconcordiaa> wrote:
> > I know that this is not recommended. But I often
> set up DeDebianachines
> > for "friends" who have virtually no clue
> whatsoever and no intentions
> > of changing this. The machines are obviously not
> very important but I
> > want to prov
> I know that this is not recommended. But I often set up Debian machines
> for "friends" who have virtually no clue whatsoever and no intentions
> of changing this. The machines are obviously not very important but I
> want to provide at least a minimal level of security because if I do not
> it w
>
> In my opinion semi-automaticaly updates sound scary
> itself...
>
> - Martin
I agree, and I never use it.
But still, even on manual updates , it can cause
problem.
cheers,
http://www.axeltabs.com/
__
axel
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Ya
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 01:59:28PM -0700, Ping Wing wrote:
> > Upgrades require interaction from time to time, such
> > as conffile merges.
> > Even with packages that use debconf, the defaults
> > you get with the
> > noninteractive frontend aren't always what you want.
>
> well but lets assume i
> Upgrades require interaction from time to time, such
> as conffile merges.
> Even with packages that use debconf, the defaults
> you get with the
> noninteractive frontend aren't always what you want.
well but lets assume i have little router ticking
somewhere. only sshd listening.
If I configu
> Every Debian init.d script that starts a daemon says
> something like
> "Starting web server: apache."
>
some processes take long time to finish.
slurpd hangs sometime mystically or takes long to
finish.
I think it could cause probelms if I start it again
before its done.
some scripts are ok
On Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:42 AM Colin Watson wrote:
>On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:19:29AM -0500, Michael Kahle wrote:
>> Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:14 AM Colin Watson wrote:
>>> I *strongly* recommend against upgrading by cron job. Just don't do
>>> it; there are lots of ways it can break.
>>
>>
Incoming from Michael Kahle:
> Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:14 AM Colin Watson wrote:
> > I *strongly* recommend against upgrading by cron job. Just don't do
> > it; there are lots of ways it can break.
>
> I have heard this mentioned before. Could you elaborate? Why is this a
> problem? Please e
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:19:29AM -0500, Michael Kahle wrote:
> Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:14 AM Colin Watson wrote:
> > I *strongly* recommend against upgrading by cron job. Just don't do
> > it; there are lots of ways it can break.
>
> I have heard this mentioned before. Could you elaborate?
Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:14 AM Colin Watson wrote:
> I *strongly* recommend against upgrading by cron job. Just don't do
> it; there are lots of ways it can break.
I have heard this mentioned before. Could you elaborate? Why is this a
problem? Please excuse my inexperience here.
Michael
--
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:14:12AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Ok, please forget _why_ I ask. The question remains - are the release
> > codenames equivalent to "stable"/"testing" in sources.list? I dont
>
> You can safely use the codenames.
Ok, tha
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:38:33PM -0700, Ping Wing wrote:
> frankly, the fact that debian puts 'stable' in source.list
> automatically is littlebit scaring. For example when sarge is new
> stable one day, and im doing another (semi-)automatic apt-get upgrade,
> theres good chance that this messe
ugh.
> >
> > We aren't even into freeze yet.
> >
> > When that happens, then you should maybe worry about that.
>
> Ok, please forget _why_ I ask. The question remains - are the release
> codenames equivalent to "stable"/"testing" in sources.li
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:38:33PM -0700, Ping Wing wrote:
> Matthias Czapla wrote:
> > Can I safely use "woody" or "sarge" instead of stable and testing
> > for the distribution specifier in /etc/apt/sources.list or can this
> > cause trouble? Im afraid of an unwanted upgrade to a new
> > distribu
> Sarge *SUDDENLY* becoming Stable. Don't make me
> laugh.
>
> We aren't even into freeze yet.
>
> When that happens, then you should maybe worry about
> that.
it doesnt matter when it happen.
I must read news every day, be prepared to change all
my sources.list when it happens?
thing is that
about that.
Ok, please forget _why_ I ask. The question remains - are the release
codenames equivalent to "stable"/"testing" in sources.list? I dont
know but I could imagine that the distribution specifier is just being
used to build up a pathname on the http/ftp server.
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 15:54, Matthias Czapla wrote:
> Can I safely use "woody" or "sarge" instead of stable and testing for
> the distribution specifier in /etc/apt/sources.list or can this cause
> trouble? Im afraid of an unwanted upgrade to a new distribution when
> testing suddenly becomes stabl
> Can I safely use "woody" or "sarge" instead of
> stable and testing for
> the distribution specifier in /etc/apt/sources.list
> or can this cause
> trouble? Im afraid of an unwanted upgrade to a new
> distribution when
> testing suddenly becomes stable.
yes you can and imho it makse very much s
Hi!
Can I safely use "woody" or "sarge" instead of stable and testing for
the distribution specifier in /etc/apt/sources.list or can this cause
trouble? Im afraid of an unwanted upgrade to a new distribution when
testing suddenly becomes stable.
Regards
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
I'm running stable/testing (mostly testing), but would like to run a nice,
secure kernel!
The latest kernel security advisory shows the following security matrix:
The following security matrix explains which kernel versions for which
architecture are already fixed. Kernel images i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Es Divendres Febrer 27 2004 21:11, en Bill Moseley va escriure:
> Do I need testing and stable entries in my sources.list if running
> unstable?
You don't (AFAIK); I've got only sid's in my sources.list...
- --
Joan Tur (aka Quini), Eivissa-Spain
On (27/02/04 12:11), Bill Moseley wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:11:02 -0800
> Subject: sources.list: Running Sid. Need stable/testing?
>
> Do I need testing and stable entries in my sources.list if runn
Do I need testing and stable entries in my sources.list if running
unstable?
--
Bill Moseley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
All,
My search on package with the name transcode returned nothing. Thus I am assuming
that it is not
part of standard debian distros. Given that, any one compiled/installed/used the
transcode package
for creating/modifying/transcoding DVD content?
The source has
High,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Ramasubramanian Ramesh wrote:
> All,
>
> My search on package with the name transcode returned nothing. Thus I am assuming
> that it is not
> part of standard debian distros. Given that, any one compiled/installed/used the
> transcode package
> for creating/modifying
All,
My search on package with the name transcode returned nothing. Thus I am assuming
that it is not
part of standard debian distros. Given that, any one compiled/installed/used the
transcode package
for creating/modifying/transcoding DVD content?
The source has a single step .deb creation c
Hello out there,
does anybody know if there is an uptodate version of evolution available for Debian
stable/testing?
Regards
Manfred
--
manfred heubach edv und neue medien
Hindenburgstr. 47
D-73728 Esslingen
Tel. +49 711 9315824
Fax +49 711 9315825
www.heubach-edv.de
sin.
>
> But how?
> I'm a little shy of installing tarballs -- I'm afraid this would give me
> trouble when eventually I want to install the .deb package.
>
> Leaves me with getting it from testing; I regularly see posts on this
> list where people claim to have a mix
Debian
packaging system will stay away.
> Leaves me with getting it from testing; I regularly see posts on this
> list where people claim to have a mixed setup from stable / testing /
> unstable, but I found no clue on how I could do this myself.
>
> Could someone please provide m
his would give me
trouble when eventually I want to install the .deb package.
Leaves me with getting it from testing; I regularly see posts on this
list where people claim to have a mixed setup from stable / testing /
unstable, but I found no clue on how I could do this myself.
Could someone ple
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:19:35AM +0200, Alex Polite wrote:
> Package pinning is driving my crazy. Every now and then I just have to
> have something that is only available in testing or unstable. My
> favorite option is to download the source, compile it myself and
> install in /usr/local but eve
t -b source
# dpkg -i *.deb
> I wish pinning didn't exist.
It is a good tool to pull-in unstable into testing but ... I have to
agree on your feeling to some extent.
Once you install any C programs, they pull in latest libc...
> > I want to install stable, testing and unstable u
easier to find a
backport (see http://www.apt-get.org/, for instance) or produce one
yourself.
I wish pinning didn't exist.
> I want to install stable, testing and unstable under separate
> directories. All stable packs, configuration files etc goes under
> /stable, testing packs go
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:28:57AM +0200, Albert Dengg wrote:
> ...
> > I want to install stable, testing and unstable under separate
> > directories. All stable packs, configuration files etc goes under
> > /stable, testing packs goes under /testing and so on.
> ...
> w
...
> I want to install stable, testing and unstable under separate
> directories. All stable packs, configuration files etc goes under
> /stable, testing packs goes under /testing and so on.
...
well, here is a guide to set up debian in a chroot enviroment
http://www.debian.org/do
has a gazillion dependencies.
So I do apt-get -t unstable
Almost without exemption this will lead to hairy dependency
problems.
Here's what I'd like to do instead.
I want to install stable, testing and unstable under separate
directories. All stable packs, configuration files etc goes under
/
Sorted - the problem was an incorrect ServerName declaration in the
Client.conf file
Many thanks for your help
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sdownes wrote:
- SNIP- <
I've got the deb stable packages installed with default settings at
present but had the same problem with the testing version & played about
with a lot of settings in that before purging it & starting again. I do
have cupsys cupsys-client & cupsys-bsd installed but no
Original Message
sdownes wrote:
>> Cannot get anything to print direct to lp or lpr. I can get it to
>>print. .to
>> lp -d lp@host no problem.
>>
>> I appear to have the default printer set to lp & am working (initially)
>> from that host. I can move the default to another pr
sdownes wrote:
Cannot get anything to print direct to lp or lpr. I can get it to print to
lp -d lp@host no problem.
I appear to have the default printer set to lp & am working (initially)
from that host. I can move the default to another printer but this
makes no difference.
As some of my sof
Cannot get anything to print direct to lp or lpr. I can get it to print to
lp -d lp@host no problem.
I appear to have the default printer set to lp & am working (initially)
from that host. I can move the default to another printer but this
makes no difference.
As some of my software will only
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 03:43:12PM +0100, Olivier Esser wrote:
> If anyone know the solution, could he/she gives me his "/etc/apt/sources.list"
> and his "/etc/apt/apt.conf" so that I can see how to do it.
I think you also need an apt-preferences file. Read the man page or
search the archive sin
Hello,
Does anyone have succeed to use the
APT::Default-Release
option in /etc/apt/apt.conf?
I would like to keep a mixed system stable/testing. The documentation tell to add an
entry to both stable and testing in /etc/sources.list and to add
APT::Default-Release "stable";
i
On Friday 11 October 2002 08:39 pm, Jerome Acks Jr wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:05:56PM -0600, Shawn Willden wrote:
> > Apt::Default-Release "woody";
>
> I don't find this as a valid configuration directive in
> /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz.
I'ts mentioned in the apt-get
on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 06:05:16PM +, Jonathan Matthews ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Just wondering if anyone knows why the following's happening:
>
>
> # apt-get -f dist-upgrade
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> console-tools gdm gnome-control-center gnome-gturing g
Hi all.
Just wondering if anyone knows why the following's happening:
# apt-get -f dist-upgrade
The following packages will be REMOVED:
console-tools gdm gnome-control-center gnome-gturing groff gs gv libguile6
locales man-db task-gnome-apps task-gnome-desktop task-gnome-games
task-gnome-n
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 08:18:37AM -0400, Bob Koss wrote:
> I agree. I seem to be doing okay here by just replacing all occurances of
> 'potato' with 'testing'.
Be aware of the difference here ...
Using 'potato' means you're tracking a release codename - exactly Debian
2.2 (or Debian 2.2r). Using
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:15:26PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> When using testing, I always left the deb lines for stable in the
> sources.list file. That is to say that I think rather than replacing
> your stable lines with testing, you should leave them there and add
> lines for testing. For som
>
> When I upgraded from stable to testing all I did was
> change the stable to testing in tht sourceslist and
> away you go.. So do you need the stable lines in
> sources.list, I sy no.
I agree. I seem to be doing okay here by just replacing all occurances of
'potato' with 'testing'.
Robert
When I upgraded from stable to testing all I did was
change the stable to testing in tht sourceslist and
away you go.. So do you need the stable lines in
sources.list, I sy no.
--- Bob Koss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > I changed 'stable' to 'testing' everywhere in my
> > /etc/apt/so
> >
> > I changed 'stable' to 'testing' everywhere in my
> /etc/apt/sources.list file.
>
> When using testing, I always left the deb lines for stable in the
> sources.list file. That is to say that I think rather than replacing
> your stable lines with testing, you should leave them there and add
* Bob Koss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010919 16:07]:
> I have a Debian stable system, but I'm thinking unstable might be in my
> future.
>
> This morning I thought I'd perform the simple task of compiling pan from
> cvs.
>
> Trying to do the autoconf / make thing led me to install several packages,
> w
Bob Koss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BK> I changed 'stable' to 'testing' everywhere in my
BK> /etc/apt/sources.list file.
BK>
BK> I did an 'apt-get update'. But when I attempt to do an 'apt-get
BK> upgrade', I get the following error:
BK>
BK> 45 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove a
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0400, Bob Koss wrote:
*snip*
> I changed 'stable' to 'testing' everywhere in my /etc/apt/sources.list file.
>
> I did an 'apt-get update'. But when I attempt to do an 'apt-get upgrade', I
> get the following error:
>
> 45 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0400, Bob Koss wrote:
> I have a Debian stable system, but I'm thinking unstable might be in my
> future.
>
[snip]
>
> I changed 'stable' to 'testing' everywhere in my /etc/apt/sources.list file.
>
> I did an 'apt-get update'. But when I attempt to do an 'apt-
I have a Debian stable system, but I'm thinking unstable might be in my
future.
This morning I thought I'd perform the simple task of compiling pan from
cvs.
Trying to do the autoconf / make thing led me to install several packages,
which required even more packages. I through up my hands when I
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:14:10PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> Thanks Ben for your prompt reply! :)
>
> --- Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, to do a fresh install of woody, you download the woody
> > boot-floppies, and install woody. That's pretty simple, right? :)
> >
> > I don't
Thanks Ben for your prompt reply! :)
--- Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, to do a fresh install of woody, you download the woody
> boot-floppies, and install woody. That's pretty simple, right? :)
>
> I don't suggest upgrading to woody yet. Wait a day or two for the new
> glibc
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:40:48AM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> Err,
>
> I think I would rather have titled that message:
> "How to accomplish a fresh install of today's Woody system."
> rather than "How to upgrade ...",
> because I the procedure I gave there (and want)
> is about doing a fresh install
Err,
I think I would rather have titled that message:
"How to accomplish a fresh install of today's Woody system."
rather than "How to upgrade ...",
because I the procedure I gave there (and want)
is about doing a fresh install.
Of course, the answer is relevant to doing an upgrade of
an existi
its own. And don't put _anything_
else in.)
2. Change /etc/sources.list: stable -> testing .
3. apt-get update
4. - Now here's what I'm not sure _exactly_ what should come next.
Do we need to ftp down some debs first?
(And if so, put them where?
/var/cache/apt/archives
Did you do the "update list of available packages" step before
trying to proceed with select or install.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith O'Connell) writes:
> Hi,
>
> I decided to investigate the move from "stable" to "testing". I thought
> it would be as simple as editing the sources to replace "stab
KO> "stable" with "testing". I did that, and ran dselect to browse through
KO> the changes and found a couple of problems
KO> 1: Its plan to upgrade my stable system generates some dependency
KO> issues. It tells me that;
KO> lwrsed recommends libnss-lwres libnss-lwres does not appear to be
Hi,
I decided to investigate the move from "stable" to "testing". I thought
it would be as simple as editing the sources to replace "stable" with
"testing". I did that, and ran dselect to browse through the changes
and found a couple of problems
1: Its plan to upgrade my stable system generates s
Ilya Martynov wrote:
>
> RP> If you'd like more precise info about my rsync inclusions and
> RP> exclusions, let me know.
>
> Can you post your rsync inclusions and exclusions? I've recently tried
> to setup local mirror and I'd like to compare mine rsync setup with
> yours.
You can view my mirr
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:56:42PM +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>
> >> I want to mirror only i386 and only binaries. I've now next rules. Are
> >> they right?
> >>
> >> --exclude source/ --exclude pool/
>
> CW> pool/ contains binaries for i386 among other things, at least for
> CW> testing/unsta
>> I want to mirror only i386 and only binaries. I've now next rules. Are
>> they right?
>>
>> --exclude source/ --exclude pool/
CW> pool/ contains binaries for i386 among other things, at least for
CW> testing/unstable now and I imagine stable in the future, so you'll have
CW> to be more caref
Ilya Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>RP> If you'd like more precise info about my rsync inclusions and
>RP> exclusions, let me know.
>
>Can you post your rsync inclusions and exclusions? I've recently tried
>to setup local mirror and I'd like to compare mine rsync setup with
>yours.
>
>I want
RP> If you'd like more precise info about my rsync inclusions and
RP> exclusions, let me know.
Can you post your rsync inclusions and exclusions? I've recently tried
to setup local mirror and I'd like to compare mine rsync setup with
yours.
I want to mirror only i386 and only binaries. I've now
Brendan J Simon wrote:
>
> I'm considering mirroring Debian for our company. I'd like to know how
> much diskspace I would require. Can someone tell me the size of the
> following Debian Distros. Is there a webpage with this information ??
> Is it automagically updated ???
I mirror debian, deb
I'm considering mirroring Debian for our company. I'd like to know how
much diskspace I would require. Can someone tell me the size of the
following Debian Distros. Is there a webpage with this information ??
Is it automagically updated ???
Diskspace required for each of these Debian dis
Here's how I ironed out the problems in my system after upgrading from Potato
to Woody:
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [250201 21:56]:
I was pretty sure everything other than my GUI and Sound was working properly
based on watching the screen messages during boot and perusing dmesg. The
only problem I re
Good evening everyone,
This is my first experience with upgrading from one version to another.
I love the debian apt-get tool; for routine upgrades and keeping my system in
top order with security updates it has been the greatest help.
The upgrade from "stable" to "testing" has not been fun
I'd like to set up the following on hda:
(potato)
/boot (hda1, 5M)
/ (hda6, 4G)
(woody)
/boot (hda5, 5M)
/ (hda7, 4G)
(shared)
/home (hda8, 20G)
(swap)(hda9, 256M)
and dual-boot between them.
Is this possible? If so, how?
Is this the smartest way to accomplish the objective of
93 matches
Mail list logo
