Re: stability of multipath

2008-01-07 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:16:12AM +0100, Gilles Mocellin wrote: > Le Monday 07 January 2008 06:55:30 Alex Samad, vous avez écrit : > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:05:29PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote: > > > 2008-01-06_21:12:01-0500 Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:00:

Re: stability of multipath

2008-01-07 Thread Gilles Mocellin
Le Monday 07 January 2008 06:55:30 Alex Samad, vous avez écrit : > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:05:29PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote: > > 2008-01-06_21:12:01-0500 Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:00:00PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote: > > > > Is anyone on this list using mult

Re: stability of multipath

2008-01-07 Thread Ron Peterson
2008-01-07_01:21:47-0500 David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paul Johnson wrote: > >On Jan 6, 2008 9:55 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I believe HP is becoming more debian friendly > > > >I believe this is one of their ongoing goals, at one point they were a > >major donor to Software in th

Re: stability of multipath

2008-01-06 Thread David
Paul Johnson wrote: On Jan 6, 2008 9:55 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I believe HP is becoming more debian friendly I believe this is one of their ongoing goals, at one point they were a major donor to Software in the Public Interest, if not Debian directly. Debian directly. Bdal

Re: stability of multipath

2008-01-06 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jan 6, 2008 9:55 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe HP is becoming more debian friendly I believe this is one of their ongoing goals, at one point they were a major donor to Software in the Public Interest, if not Debian directly. -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To

Re: stability of multipath

2008-01-06 Thread Alex Samad
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:05:29PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote: > 2008-01-06_21:12:01-0500 Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:00:00PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote: > > > > Is anyone on this list using multipath and/or multipath-tools in > > > production at an enterprise leve

Re: stability of multipath

2008-01-06 Thread Ron Peterson
2008-01-06_21:12:01-0500 Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:00:00PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote: > > Is anyone on this list using multipath and/or multipath-tools in > > production at an enterprise level? I'm considering using multipath > > for a new fileserver and a new m

Re: stability of multipath

2008-01-06 Thread Alex Samad
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 08:00:00PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone on this list using multipath and/or multipath-tools in > production at an enterprise level? I'm considering using multipath for > a new fileserver and a new mailserver, running etch, using qlogic 2432 > hbas. This

stability of multipath

2008-01-06 Thread Ron Peterson
Hi, Is anyone on this list using multipath and/or multipath-tools in production at an enterprise level? I'm considering using multipath for a new fileserver and a new mailserver, running etch, using qlogic 2432 hbas. This would the first time I did this in production, however, so it would be nic