* Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:57:13AM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> > > Curiosity just bit me in the butt. Where does the .in-addr.arpa come
> > > from?
> >
> > From the way bind works. See e.g. O'Reilly's "DNS and Bind".
>
> Well, er, it's n
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:57:13AM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> > Curiosity just bit me in the butt. Where does the .in-addr.arpa come
> > from?
>
> From the way bind works. See e.g. O'Reilly's "DNS and Bind".
Well, er, it's not there because of the way BIND works. Rather, BIND
works that w
* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:29:39 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> >* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> >> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:12:56 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> >> >Didn't you read Sven's rely? It says "DNS problem" right there.
>
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:29:39 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:12:56 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> >Didn't you read Sven's rely? It says "DNS problem" right there.
>Make that "reply".
Hmph; I see so many typos on the lists,
* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:12:56 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> >* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> >> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:46:00 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wr
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:12:56 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:46:00 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>>
>
>Didn't you read Sven's rely? It says "DNS probl
* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:46:00 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>
> >> My question now is this: do I need to make these hosts_allow entries into
> >> each of my linux computers?
Em Sáb, 2002-03-23 às 18:09, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls escreveu:
>
> Greetings again:
>
> I have sshd working again after adding an entry in my firewall/router's
> /etc/hosts.allow file, but I am rather concerned that sshd included
> tcp_wrappers without alerting users that are upgrading software
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:46:00 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>> My question now is this: do I need to make these hosts_allow entries into
>> each of my linux computers? I still find it very odd that all the other
>> computers we
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>
> Greetings again:
>
> I have sshd working again after adding an entry in my firewall/router's
> /etc/hosts.allow file, but I am rather concerned that sshd included
> tcp_wrappers without alerting users that are upgradin
Greetings again:
I have sshd working again after adding an entry in my firewall/router's
/etc/hosts.allow file, but I am rather concerned that sshd included
tcp_wrappers without alerting users that are upgrading software via apt or
dselect! Unless I missed something, I always read all th
Greetings:
I am unable to connect to my cable firewall/router from my desktop box
suddenly. I have gone so far as to wipe out my known_hosts file from my .ssh
directory, but this still gives me the same error. What is unusual is that I
can ssh to any of the other computers on my lan, *th
12 matches
Mail list logo