Re: Securing local host of reverse SSH tunnel?

On 9/17/20 1:27 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote: * On 2020 16 Sep 12:08 -0500, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: btw, there is package authprogs, doing exactly that and not only. It seems to only be in Bullseye right now. It's not in Buster nor Buster backports. As the target computer is a Freedombox, it is

Re: Securing local host of reverse SSH tunnel?

* On 2020 15 Sep 13:54 -0500, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote: > To restrict what an SSH account can do, you can use the command="..." > setting in the autorized_keys file. It is documented in sshd(8). I use > it specifically to restrain the possible actions that can be done with > that private key.

Re: Securing local host of reverse SSH tunnel?

* On 2020 16 Sep 12:08 -0500, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > btw, there is package authprogs, doing exactly that and not only. It seems to only be in Bullseye right now. It's not in Buster nor Buster backports. As the target computer is a Freedombox, it is running Buster so I will have to see if I

Re: Securing local host of reverse SSH tunnel?

On 9/15/20 8:53 PM, Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY wrote: > Nate Bargmann writes: > >> I am going to be deploying a Debian system at a location where I am >> unsure if I can make any inbound connection into that system. I am >> going to set up an SSH tunnel from that system to a h

Re: Securing local host of reverse SSH tunnel?

Nate Bargmann writes: > I am going to be deploying a Debian system at a location where I am > unsure if I can make any inbound connection into that system. I am > going to set up an SSH tunnel from that system to a host in my LAN. > What I am concerned about is the remote possibil

Re: Securing local host of reverse SSH tunnel?

>Ideally, this restriction should be based on the public key of the pair but I've not seen in sshd_config(5) a way for the Match directive to use the public key as its trigger Not an expert but did you look at the certificate based authentication? You can define your own certificate authority and

Re: Securing local host of reverse SSH tunnel?

Nate Bargmann wrote: > I am going to be deploying a Debian system at a location where I am > unsure if I can make any inbound connection into that system. I am > going to set up an SSH tunnel from that system to a host in my LAN. Use Wireguard. It's available in newer kernels an

Securing local host of reverse SSH tunnel?

Hi All. I am going to be deploying a Debian system at a location where I am unsure if I can make any inbound connection into that system. I am going to set up an SSH tunnel from that system to a host in my LAN. What I am concerned about is the remote possibility of theft and therefore exposing

Re: PgAdmin with SSH tunnel

On 2018-06-10, wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 03:23:06PM +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm using Debian Stretch and I'm trying to connect to PostgreSQL server >> (Debian 9) with PgAdmin (Debian 9) through SSH tunnel. >> >>

Re: PgAdmin with SSH tunnel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 03:23:06PM +0300, Georgi Naplatanov wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using Debian Stretch and I'm trying to connect to PostgreSQL server > (Debian 9) with PgAdmin (Debian 9) through SSH tunnel. > > PgAdmin

PgAdmin with SSH tunnel

Hi, I'm using Debian Stretch and I'm trying to connect to PostgreSQL server (Debian 9) with PgAdmin (Debian 9) through SSH tunnel. PgAdmin has built-in SSH support but when I try to connect to remote PostgreSQL server I get this error in PgAdmin: Error: SSH error: Error when start

Timeout, on access to MTA/25, from offsite over SSH tunnel

List good morning, I am trying to access our MTA from offsite over an SSH tunnel, but the MUA (Thunderbird) is reporting a timeout on accessing the MTA. The server is Wheezy; sshd is running; the tunnel is set up to terminate on the same server that runs the MTA (exim), as well as running

Re: QT through ssh tunnel

On 11/22/2013 03:11 PM, Dan wrote: Hi, I have gnome and I use a QT application (virtualbox) with a ssh tunnel in the same computer. I use a different user than the user that I use with Gnome. The problem is that I get the old QT theme (Windows 95/motif style) when I run virtualbox with a ssh

QT through ssh tunnel

Hi, I have gnome and I use a QT application (virtualbox) with a ssh tunnel in the same computer. I use a different user than the user that I use with Gnome. The problem is that I get the old QT theme (Windows 95/motif style) when I run virtualbox with a ssh tunnel. In the other hand, if I run a

Re: ssh tunnel delay

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 02:28:37PM +0200, Juan Sierra Pons wrote: > 2013/9/10 Sean Alexandre > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Juan Sierra Pons wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I don't see anything strange in the logs provided. Do you see anything > > > strange in your dmesg, /var/log/

Re: ssh tunnel delay

-- Juan Sierra Pons j...@elsotanillo.net Linux User Registered: #257202 http://www.elsotanillo.net GPG key = 0xA110F4FE Key Fingerprint = DF53 7415 0936 244E 9B00 6E66 E934 340

Re: ssh tunnel delay

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Juan Sierra Pons wrote: > Hi, > > I don't see anything strange in the logs provided. Do you see anything > strange in your dmesg, /var/log/daemon.log, etc? > > Is the DNS on the server's side working properly? Sometimes when the > reverse DNS is not prope

Re: ssh tunnel delay

Hi, I don't see anything strange in the logs provided. Do you see anything strange in your dmesg, /var/log/daemon.log, etc? Is the DNS on the server's side working properly? Sometimes when the reverse DNS is not properly configure some TCP based services get some delay on first connection: ssh, m

Re: ssh tunnel delay

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:25:59PM +0200, Juan Sierra Pons wrote: > Can you launch the tunnel in verbose (-vvv) mode and send the logs? > ssh -vvv -o ExitOnForwardFailure=yes -fN -L1110:localhost:1212 server Here's what I'm seeing with -vvv: http://paste.debian.net/37873/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: ssh tunnel delay

I'm seeing a delay when I attempt a connection through an ssh tunnel. The > connection's fast without the tunnel, but has an inital 80 second delay > with > it. > > Here's the case that works, without the tunnel. I see lines I type echoed > immediately: > > serv

ssh tunnel delay

I'm seeing a delay when I attempt a connection through an ssh tunnel. The connection's fast without the tunnel, but has an inital 80 second delay with it. Here's the case that works, without the tunnel. I see lines I type echoed immediately: server> nc -l -p 1212 client> n

Re: ssh tunnel help

On Wed, 22 May 2013, Lars Noodén wrote: > One way you could try is like this[1]: > > ssh -L 5432:localhost:5432 \ > -o 'ProxyCommand=ssh -W %h:%p pub1.example.org' \ > devel.example.org As a follow up here is a method that should work for older versions of ssh: ssh -L 5

Re: ssh tunnel help

On 5/22/13 4:15 PM, Nelson Green wrote: > ... connect my psql client directly to that development server, on it's > port 5432. So I want to be able to locally run a command similar to: > [me@mymachine]$ psql -U dbusername -h dev1 -p xxx > where, if I remember correctly, xxx is the port I tunnel i

Re: ssh tunnel help

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:24AM -0500, Nelson Green wrote: >Hello all, > >Seems I'm a bit brain dead this morning, and I'm having difficulty >remembering how to set up an ssh tunnel to our development server through >the public facing system > &

ssh tunnel help

Hello all, Seems I'm a bit brain dead this morning, and I'm having difficulty remembering how to set up an ssh tunnel to our development server through the public facing system I can ssh into pub1 just fine, and from that shell I can ssh into the development server, dev1. What I want t

[solved] Re: VNC not connecting over SSH tunnel

On 10/07/12 01:10 PM, Chris Davies wrote: Gary Dale wrote: Thanks again Chris. If I understand your model correctly, the "remote_router" is the ssh server and not the actual router that merely forwards port 22 to the ssh server. Yes. It's only now clear to me that the router isn't the ssh serv

Re: VNC not connecting over SSH tunnel

Gary Dale wrote: > Thanks again Chris. If I understand your model correctly, the > "remote_router" is the ssh server and not the actual router that merely > forwards port 22 to the ssh server. Yes. It's only now clear to me that the router isn't the ssh server. But for the purposes of the descr

Re: VNC not connecting over SSH tunnel

On 10/07/12 04:41 AM, Chris Davies wrote: Gary Dale wrote: I can connect to every workstation in a remote office using: ssh -L 5902::5900 xtightvncviewer -encodings "tight" localhost:5902 However, there is one workstation [...] The ssh session also shows this message: channel 3: open fail

Re: VNC not connecting over SSH tunnel

On 07/10/2012 01:41 AM, Chris Davies wrote: Gary Dale wrote: I can connect to every workstation in a remote office using: ssh -L 5902::5900 xtightvncviewer -encodings "tight" localhost:5902 However, there is one workstation [...] The ssh session also shows this message: channel 3: open fai

Re: VNC not connecting over SSH tunnel

Gary Dale wrote: > I can connect to every workstation in a remote office using: > ssh -L 5902::5900 public IP> > xtightvncviewer -encodings "tight" localhost:5902 > However, there is one workstation [...] > The ssh session also shows this message: > channel 3: open failed: connect failed: No

Re: VNC not connecting over SSH tunnel

and the laptop (when I plugged it into their network). The local forwarding would be handled on the subnet so that if it worked for one station, shouldn't it work for all? I don't see how the router would enter into it. It just passes the ssh tunnel to the ssh server, although

Re: VNC not connecting over SSH tunnel

Gary Dale wrote: > I can connect to every workstation in a remote office using: > ssh -L 5902::5900 public IP> > xtightvncviewer -encodings "tight" localhost:5902 > However, there is one workstation [...] > The ssh session also shows this message: >channel 3: open failed: connect failed: No

VNC not connecting over SSH tunnel

I'm not having this problem on all machines. I can connect to every workstation in a remote office using: ssh -L 5902::5900 public IP> then in another terminal: xtightvncviewer -encodings "tight" localhost:5902 However, there is one workstation that I get xtightvncviewer: VNC server clo

Re: how to open ssh tunnel port ?

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:56:01 +0100 Laurence Hurst wrote: [...] > > ssh -L 192.168.0.1:3360:localhost:3306 A > > where '192.168.0.1' is the ip address you want to bind to (i.e. the ip > address of eth0, or whichever interface you want to use). The same > method applies if you are using -R

Re: how to open ssh tunnel port ?

On 27/06/2012 15:37, J. Bakshi wrote: Dear list, I have made a successful ssh tunnel between two pcs A and B. A is running mysql and B have the tunnel with A , so that B can access that remote mysql with its local port 3360. Everything is fine.. But B is bind the port with localhost only

Re: how to open ssh tunnel port ?

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:37:30PM +0100, J. Bakshi wrote: > > Dear list, > > I have made a successful ssh tunnel between two pcs A and B. > A is running mysql and B have the tunnel with A , so that B > can access that remote mysql with its local port 3360. Everything > is

how to open ssh tunnel port ?

Dear list, I have made a successful ssh tunnel between two pcs A and B. A is running mysql and B have the tunnel with A , so that B can access that remote mysql with its local port 3360. Everything is fine.. But B is bind the port with localhost only, hence no one can access B's 3360

Re: ssh tunnel

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:29:01 -0700, vicky mhe wrote: (please, avoid using html) > Dear debian > > i use ssh for tunnel this is my command > > ssh -l vicky -L :192.168.21.2:22 118.97.247.242 18.97.xx.xx > password: > Segmentation fault > > in my syslog/messeges > > > ernel: [  112.994103]

Re: ssh tunnel

On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 18:29 -0700, vicky mhe wrote: > ssh -l vicky -L :192.168.21.2:22 118.97.247.242 18.97.xx.xx > password: > Segmentation fault > ssh without forwarding is working on both hosts? > > in my syslog/messeges > ernel: [ 112.994103] ssh[2487]: segfault at b7e62000 ip b75d20

Re: ssh tunnel

2012/3/22 vicky mhe : > Dear debian > > i use ssh for tunnel this is my command > > ssh -l vicky -L :192.168.21.2:22 118.97.247.242 18.97.xx.xx > password: > Segmentation fault > > in my syslog/messeges > > ernel: [  112.994103] ssh[2487]: segfault at b7e62000 ip b75d20cd sp > bfbf5b3c error 4

ssh tunnel

Dear debian i use ssh for tunnel this is my command ssh -l vicky -L :192.168.21.2:22 118.97.247.242 18.97.xx.xx password: Segmentation fault in my syslog/messeges ernel: [  112.994103] ssh[2487]: segfault at b7e62000 ip b75d20cd sp bfbf5b3c error 4 in libcrypto.so.1.0.0[b7569000+1a3000]

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

Mitchell Laks wrote: On 14:38 Fri 03 Oct , Celejar wrote: On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:02:22 -0400 There are several apt proxies available: apt-cacher apt-cacher-ng apt-proxy approx [I use approx; various readers of this list have their own preferences.] Set up one of them on A, configure B-

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:02:22PM -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote: > Now I know how to browse the internet on B-D by creating a ssh tunnel > to A and utilizing the Iceweasel Browser settings to use a local Socks > proxy. This is untested, but if you change your sources.list to include

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 04:02:21PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Run squid on A and let others access it. You need to set http_proxy > > environment variable or use apt.conf setting for all A,B,C. Then you > > save bandwidth. > > Or use apt-cache. You must have meant apt-

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

Osamu Aoki wrote: > Run squid on A and let others access it. You need to set http_proxy > environment variable or use apt.conf setting for all A,B,C. Then you > save bandwidth. Or use apt-cache. -- Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream PGP Key: 1FC01004

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:01:55 -0400 Mitchell Laks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14:38 Fri 03 Oct , Celejar wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:02:22 -0400 > > > > There are several apt proxies available: > > > > apt-cacher > > apt-cacher-ng > > apt-proxy > > approx > > > > [I use approx; vario

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

etwork but can ssh into > machine A. > > Now I know how to browse the internet on B-D > by creating a ssh tunnel to A and utilizing the Iceweasel Browser settings > to use a > local Socks proxy. Yes. > Can I do something similar with apt-get so that I can apt-get update and

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

ne A. > > Now I know how to browse the internet on B-D > by creating a ssh tunnel to A and utilizing the Iceweasel Browser settings > to use a > local Socks proxy. > > > Can I do something similar with apt-get so that I can apt-get update and > apt-get upgra

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

On 14:38 Fri 03 Oct , Celejar wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:02:22 -0400 > > There are several apt proxies available: > > apt-cacher > apt-cacher-ng > apt-proxy > approx > > [I use approx; various readers of this list have their own preferences.] > > Set up one of them on A, configure B-D's

Re: How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

ssh into > machine A. > > Now I know how to browse the internet on B-D > by creating a ssh tunnel to A and utilizing the Iceweasel Browser settings > to use a > local Socks proxy. > > > Can I do something similar with apt-get so that I can apt-get update and >

How to apt-get over ssh tunnel through a firewall?

private network with machine A 192.168.4.x, and getting internet access via NAT through A. Now machines B-D no longer live on the private network but can ssh into machine A. Now I know how to browse the internet on B-D by creating a ssh tunnel to A and utilizing the Iceweasel Browser

Re: smtp through a ssh tunnel to exim4 or other MTA

home. > SSH is not needed on my LAN. This works with no problem. > > Oberon MUA at home ==LAN==> exim4 at home ==WAN==> ISP > > This is the trial configuration for sending mail from a > remote location, most commonly from work. > > Remote Oberon MUA ==ssh tun

smtp through a ssh tunnel to exim4 or other MTA

N==> exim4 at home ==WAN==> ISP This is the trial configuration for sending mail from a remote location, most commonly from work. Remote Oberon MUA ==ssh tunnel==> exim4 at home ==WAN==> ISP It fails. exim4 appears to reject the ssh connection for relaying. Someone please tell

gnome & cups through ssh tunnel

Hi all, I wish to be able to print to printers on a remote cups server from gnome applications. I figured I could just create an ssh tunnel like this: $ ssh -L 1631:localhost:631 [EMAIL PROTECTED] then set the cups server to localhost:1631 in /etc/cups/client.conf But no printers appear in

Re: Relay over SSH tunnel with Postfix?

On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 20:55 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:58:45PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > >You could try `ssh -L 25:localhost:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Of course, that requires that you be root. If that will not work, use > >port 2525 on the first part of

Re: Relay over SSH tunnel with Postfix?

s list don't seem to reach the list :-( >> This has given me enough incentive to look into solutions that would let >> me send emails without going through they flakey mail servers at work. >> >> What I was considering was a setup with a local postfix relaying email &g

Re: Relay over SSH tunnel with Postfix?

incentive to look into solutions that would let > me send emails without going through they flakey mail servers at work. > > What I was considering was a setup with a local postfix relaying email > over an SSH tunnel to a server. > > Does anyone any good resource for this (besides Googl

Relay over SSH tunnel with Postfix?

end emails without going through they flakey mail servers at work. What I was considering was a setup with a local postfix relaying email over an SSH tunnel to a server. Does anyone any good resource for this (besides Google, please :-)? /M -- Magnus Therning(OpenPGP:

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

On 5/23/05, Josh Rehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/23/05, André Carezia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No. Look for AllowTcpForwarding in /etc/ssh/sshd_config. I don't have permission to read that file - I'll contact the sysadmin. Thanks. Turns out that my hosting service has dissallowed usage o

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

On 5/23/05, André Carezia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No. Look for AllowTcpForwarding in /etc/ssh/sshd_config. I don't have permission to read that file - I'll contact the sysadmin. Thanks.

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

Josh Rehman wrote: > [...] > I agree. However I'm not sure how to look deeper into my providers > configuration. I'm thinking that some usage of either ps or netstat > could tell me what's going on. No. Look for AllowTcpForwarding in /etc/ssh/sshd_config. -- André Carezia Eng. de Telecomunicaçõ

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

On 5/23/05, André Carezia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Josh Rehman wrote:> [...]> Does mod_proxy have some sort of priveledged access to ssh tunnels?> Are you saying that my simple telnet test cannot work ever?Please send your replies to the list. Of course.  Gmail "Reply" does not work correctly wi

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

Josh Rehman wrote: > [...] > Does mod_proxy have some sort of priveledged access to ssh tunnels? > Are you saying that my simple telnet test cannot work ever? Please send your replies to the list. > internal>[start server on 8080] > internal>[make sure server is listening] > internal>ssh -R 8080

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

Josh Rehman a écrit : On 5/22/05, *André Carezia* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: ssh -R 8080:localhost:80 [EMAIL PROTECTED] My apologies, I should have mentioned that that was what I tried. Here is the result: external>$ telnet localhost 8080 Trying 127.0.0.1...

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

Josh Rehman wrote: > On 5/22/05, *André Carezia* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > ssh -R 8080:localhost:80 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > My apologies, I should have mentioned that that was what I tried. Here > is the result: > > external>$ telnet localhost 8080 You can't

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

I also tried other ports but without success.-- "It seemed to them that they did little but eat and drink and rest, and walk among the trees; and it was enough."- J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings, "The Mirror of Galadriel"

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

On 5/22/05, André Carezia <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: ssh -R 8080:localhost:80 [EMAIL PROTECTED] My apologies, I should have mentioned that that was what I tried. Here is the result: external>$ telnet localhost 8080 Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused

Re: HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

Josh Rehman wrote: >A solution which I believe is quite elegant involves ssh'ing from the >laptop to my external, statically IP'd host. I would then need to >notify the externally running httpd that a tunnel is now available, >and then use something like the ProxyPass directive to seemlessly >forw

HOWTO reverse proxy through an internal-server-initiated ssh tunnel?

I would like to expose a web server running on a personal laptop elegantly and securely. This laptop is not always connected at the same point, so a static IP will not do. I am also familiar with dynamic dns however my laptop will sometimes be behind firewalls over which I have no control. A solut

Exim4 synchronization error over ssh tunnel

Hi all, I'm using a ssh tunnel between my local smtp server and the one running on my mail server to receive my mail. This setup has worked relly well for me in the past months and has the advantage that I do not have to periodically check for new mail, but get it delivered directly to m

Re: How to use ssh tunnel to reach a machine on a private network?

Oliver Elphick wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 01:30, Roberto Sanchez wrote: Oliver Elphick wrote: ... What I am trying to do is to use ssh tunnelling to go direct to one of the machines on the remote private network, because I need to be able to run X programs from that machine on my own display.

Re: How to use ssh tunnel to reach a machine on a private network?

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 01:30, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Oliver Elphick wrote: ... > > What I am trying to do is to use ssh tunnelling to go direct to one of > > the machines on the remote private network, because I need to be able to > > run X programs from that machine on my own display. ... > I do

Re: How to use ssh tunnel to reach a machine on a private network?

Oliver Elphick wrote: I wonder if anyone can help me work out how to do this, please: I have two private networks (192.168.1.0/24) each with a firewall machine connecting through ADSL to the Internet. Each private network can reach the Internet through the firewall (using NAT); therefore no machi

How to use ssh tunnel to reach a machine on a private network?

I wonder if anyone can help me work out how to do this, please: I have two private networks (192.168.1.0/24) each with a firewall machine connecting through ADSL to the Internet. Each private network can reach the Internet through the firewall (using NAT); therefore no machine except the firewall

Re: Fetchmail + SSH tunnel

On Wed, 08 May 2002 04:23:34 +0200, Carlos A P Gomes wrote: > Does anybody use fetchmail to get mail through a ssh tunnel? I'm trying > that with no success. [...] Have a look at: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Secure-POP+SSH.html ./fs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Fetchmail + SSH tunnel

Does anybody use fetchmail to get mail through a ssh tunnel? I'm trying that with no success. I have a shell account with my provider and can login with ssh or sftp without problem. I've configured my fetchmailrc to preconnect with ssh: .fetchmailrc poll localhost port 0 proto pop

Anonymizer.com SSH Tunnel service

Has anyone had any success setting up Anonymizer.com's SSH Tunnel product with Linux? http://www.anonymizer.com/docs/faqs/sshfaq.shtml It uses SSH1 to build a secure tunnel between you and their servers and all of your internet traffic goes through them, thus the 'secure tunnel.'

ange-ftp with ssh-tunnel?

Hi, since I don't like passwords be transmitted in plain text I'd like the ange-ftp facility of Emacs I'd like to use an ssh tunnel for the command connection of FTP. Has somebody gotten this to work? Regards, Joey -- Whenever you meet yourself you're in a time l