Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:03:03PM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > Set cipher to blowfish (or none, if you're running it over trusted > network), remove compression. Debian's ssh package is compiled without support for cipher=none. You can rebuild it if you really want that, of course...

Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

* Adam Majer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:17:28PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > > On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote: > > > Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from > > > stable -> testing, ssh'ing in takes massively long

Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:17:28PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote: > > Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from > > stable -> testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before? > > > > ssh2 is more computationally in

Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote: > Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from > stable -> testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before? > ssh2 is more computationally intensive.

Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

I'm wondering too why ssh2 takes much longer to build a connection. On recent machines it takes only about 2-3 seconds, but that's still slow, esp. for things like tkcvs, and slow connections make it worse. chj.

RE: SSH 2 slower than 1?

Title: RE: SSH 2 slower than 1? JC, If you don't get a reasonable answer here. Maybe trying the OpenSSH list might help. Might be a good place to ask there too. From what I see from posts there they answer fairly quickly like debian-user does. Later, Todd > -Original

SSH 2 slower than 1?

Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from stable -> testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before? A "ssh -v kanyon exit" reveals that the slow point is immediately after debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY .. bu

Re: ssh 2 for Potato?

RS> Of course, there's probably a package around that would be alot easier. Yep. By the way, I think that on a Potato system it would be better to link SSL statically so as to avoid confusion between SSL versions. Juliusz

RE: ssh 2 for Potato?

> From: Juliusz Chroboczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Anyone got a trusted source for a packaged ssh 2 for Potato? Try: #!/bin/sh # openssl.sh # http://www.openssl.org/source/ VER=0.9.6 APP=openssl DIR=$APP-$VER FILE=$APP.tar.gz URL=http://www.openssl.org/source/

ssh 2 for Potato?

Anyone got a trusted source for a packaged ssh 2 for Potato? Thanks, Juliusz

ssh 2

MaD dUCK writes: > is anyone out there using OpenSSH 2.0.13 from the testing archive? or > does anyone know when we can use ssh2 as a debian package. sure, i > could tarball install, but i'd much rather stick to packages to > minimize my time commitment. I'm using ssh

ssh 2

is anyone out there using OpenSSH 2.0.13 from the testing archive? or does anyone know when we can use ssh2 as a debian package. sure, i could tarball install, but i'd much rather stick to packages to minimize my time commitment. martin [greetings from the heart of the sun]# echo [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: SSH 2

It's available in potato/non-US I believe. I just tried searching for it with the bot on the #debian irc channel and it couldn't find it. Since it can only search the US mirrors, and since I have seen it before, it must be a non-US package. On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Rune Linding Raun wrote: > i need

Re: SSH 2

Rune Linding Raun wrote: > > i need SSH2 daemon on my system does it excist as a .deb? Take a look at http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/non-us/ssh2.html -- __ _ Mark Wagnon Debian GNU/ -o) / / (_)__ __ __ Chula Vista, CA

SSH 2

i need SSH2 daemon on my system does it excist as a .deb?

Re: Is ssh 2 incompatible with ssh 1?

On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 23:40:57 +, Marc Haber wrote: > However, I have been told that lsh uses scheme which is not free in a > Debian sense. Thus, lsh will not yield a "true free" version of ssh which > is what the world _urgently_ needs. You're misinformed. - Scheme is a programming languag

Re: Is ssh 2 incompatible with ssh 1?

On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:28:14 +0200, you wrote: >Work is being done to implement the version 2 protocol as free software >(GPLed); see http://www.net.lut.ac.uk/psst/ ; contributors to this project >are welcome. However, I have been told that lsh uses scheme which is not free in a Debian sense. Thus

Re: Is ssh 2 incompatible with ssh 1?

Well, let me say what I did to get it working: I installed ssh1 first... with deamons and all... then I installed ssh2... over that. then edited /etc/ssh2/ssh2_config set this to yes, when I found it in the manpages: Ssh1AgentCompatibility yes so, now when a ssh1 client tries to connect

Re: Is ssh 2 incompatible with ssh 1?

On Friday, April 23, 1999 at 10:06:19 -0400, Arcady Genkin wrote: > From: Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" > Sender: Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I've installed ssh 2.10 and tried to connect to my sc

Re: Is ssh 2 incompatible with ssh 1?

On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 10:10:18 -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote: > The other option is to can ssh2 (and I would just because of the licensing > differences) SSH2, while having a license that is more evil than SSH1, is based on version 2 of the SSH protocol, which is much more friendly for free software

Re: Is ssh 2 incompatible with ssh 1?

On 23 Apr 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote: Hi all: I've installed ssh 2.10 and tried to connect to my school via ssh (I know that they run ssh protocol) and got the following: bash-2.01$ ssh cdf.utoronto.ca Disconnected; protocol version not supported. They are using ve

Re: Is ssh 2 incompatible with ssh 1?

On 23 Apr 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote: > I've installed ssh 2.10 and tried to connect to my school via ssh (I > know that they run ssh protocol) and got the following: > > > bash-2.01$ ssh cdf.utoronto.ca > > Disconnected; protocol version not supported. > > They are using vershio 1, AFAIK. Doe

Is ssh 2 incompatible with ssh 1?

Hi all: I've installed ssh 2.10 and tried to connect to my school via ssh (I know that they run ssh protocol) and got the following: bash-2.01$ ssh cdf.utoronto.ca Disconnected; protocol version not supported. They are using vershio 1, AFAIK. Does this mean that v.2 is incompatible with it or

Re: SSH 2

On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 21:00:35 +1000, Jiri Baum wrote: > where can I find ssh 2, please? ftp://ftp.cs.hut.fi/pub/ssh/ It's license is more restrictive than SSH1's; noone has so far volunteered to package it. Unlike SSH1's protocol, SSH2's can be implemented in fr

Re: SSH 2

> where can I find ssh 2, please? ftp.cs.hut.fi Groetjes, Ookhoi

SSH 2

Hello, where can I find ssh 2, please? thank you Jiri -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We'll know the future has arrived when every mailer transparently quotes lines that begin with "From ", but no-one remembers why.

Ssh(2) setup...

I just downloaded and installed ssh2, but am unable to ssh to my comp... I keep getting the following errors when I ssh in verbose mode: dove: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config dove: ssh_connect: getuid 5443 geteuid 0 anon 0 dove: Connecting to dogbert.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.95.152]