Tom Allison wrote:
why is there two different versions (v2.x vs v3.x) of squid supported?
Is there that much incompatibility between the two?
pros/cons with one over the other?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg52046.html
Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does squid3 come with SSL support compiled in?
I don't know, but I do know that you don't traditionally cache SSL as
you'd have to make yourself a trusted man in the middle...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does squid3 come with SSL support compiled in?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why is there two different versions (v2.x vs v3.x) of squid supported?
Is there that much incompatibility between the two?
pros/cons with one over the other?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Incidentally, how much space are you dedicating to your Squid cache? I
> know that this can't be assigned directly, so either the segment size,
> or net use (du -s on cache) would be useful.
Currently (of
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 06:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Incidentally, how much space are you dedicating to your Squid cache? I
> > know that this can&#x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:49:47AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Incidentally, how much space are you dedicating to your Squid cache? I
> know that this can't be assigned directly, so either the segment size,
> or net use (du -s on c
t; use of its capacity, hence the decision to move the security function
> to a separate box.
Incidentally, how much space are you dedicating to your Squid cache? I
know that this can't be assigned directly, so either the segment size,
or net use (du -s on cache) would be useful.
Peace.
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 08:09:30AM -0500, dman wrote:
> It's just a perl script that also includes lots of URL patterns for ad
> banners. In squid.conf, specify it as a redirector_program.
... and much more. Not only does the author maintain a very complete list of
patterns, you can also spec you
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:40:06AM -0400, David Jackson wrote:
| > On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:02:49AM -0700, Walter Reed wrote:
| >
| >> Another reason to run squid: adzap. It's amazing how much it speeds up
| >> browsing on my IDSL line...
| >
| > What's the Debian name for adzap?
|
| My quess
> On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:02:49AM -0700, Walter Reed wrote:
>
>> Another reason to run squid: adzap. It's amazing how much it speeds up
>> browsing on my IDSL line...
>
> What's the Debian name for adzap?
>
> --
> Baloo
My quess is adzap is part of the squid package
David
--
--
To UN
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 10:31:41PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:02:49AM -0700, Walter Reed wrote:
>
> > Another reason to run squid: adzap. It's amazing how much it speeds up
> > browsing
> > on my IDSL line...
>
> What's the Debian name for adzap?
http://www.google.c
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 08:02:49AM -0700, Walter Reed wrote:
> Another reason to run squid: adzap. It's amazing how much it speeds up
> browsing
> on my IDSL line...
What's the Debian name for adzap?
--
Baloo
pgpa5nWXw8xjk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 09:24:46PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Curiosity to see if its worth keeping squid duing a transparent proxy
> now that our broadband came up (we were stuffed on dialup for four days
> when the person in charge of getting everybody's share of rent and bill
> money forgot th
On Sunday 26 May 2002 12:58, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Will I get enough winnage over the cable modem to make it worth while
> now that the broadband's back?
Depends on the servers you want to access. I "only" have ADSL with
maximum 90KB/s download, and yet the average speed seeme to be
somewhere b
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:44:51AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
> My instinct is that it probably is worth it because your web browser will
> initially ask the proxy, which is presumably either local, or attached via
> LAN, rather than the remote server, which is over 56K.
Will I get enough winnag
t; > list of sites (if you want to mirror your own behavior) from the squid
> > cache logs themselves.
And you could use Galeon's saved sessions feature for this.
> Damn, I was hoping for nice stats on both. I kinda wish there was a
> free tool for this.
I use Squid with the c
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 03:03:26PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I'd activate cache, flush it then run an automated pull of a slew of
> sites tried against both a proxied and unproxied session. You can get a
> list of sites (if you want to mirror your own behavior) from the squi
offsite graphics (banners) are significant slowdown factors).
I'd activate cache, flush it then run an automated pull of a slew of
sites tried against both a proxied and unproxied session. You can get a
list of sites (if you want to mirror your own behavior) from the squid
cache logs themse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a good way to benchmark performance on web surfing with squid
doing caching and without on a small household network?
- --
Baloo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE867x4NtWkM9Ny9xURArnmAJ4rUEVRhb/Kt4IDn
20 matches
Mail list logo
