Hi,
On 22/02/2016 5:25 AM, deloptes wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> what is the mail server on this system? It should have one - perhaps also
> exim
It is exim4 as per the packages list.
I fixed this by regenerating the certificate, that's all it was.
Right now it is using my own self signed
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> I can't find anything that seems to be significant except for the linux
> kernel version.
the error is not likely to be related to the kernel version
>
> NB: A simpler VM on the same Xen server has been running Wheezy for quite
> a while, but it isn't a mail server.
w
Hi,
I've been running squeeze-lts VM on a squeeze-lts Xen server.
Updated the VM to wheezy and it mostly works okay, but but mail
connections fail with a segfault.
# swaks -4 -s mail.affinityvision.com.au -tlsc -p 465 --ehlo
affintiyvision.com.au -au andrewm -ap -t
andrew.m
Hi,
I've been running squeeze-lts VM on a squeeze-lts Xen
server. Updated the VM to wheezy and it most ly works okay, but but mail
connections fail with a segfault
#ÃÂ swaks -4
-s mail.affinityvision.com.au -tlsc -p 465 --ehlo
affintiyvision.com.au -au andrewm -apÃ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/15 03:55, Bret Busby wrote:
> -- Forwarded message -- From: Bret Busby
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:54:42 +0800
> Subject: Re: Bug#780201: new codename needed for oldstable (due to
> squeeze-lts) when st
Quoting Bret Busby (bret.bu...@gmail.com):
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Bret Busby
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:54:42 +0800
> Subject: Re: Bug#780201: new codename needed for oldstable (due to
> squeeze-lts) when stable becomes oldstable
> To: debian-...@l
On 3/10/15, Bret Busby wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Bret Busby
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:54:42 +0800
> Subject: Re: Bug#780201: new codename needed for oldstable (due to
> squeeze-lts) when stable becomes oldstable
> To: debian-...@lists.debian.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bret Busby
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 22:54:42 +0800
Subject: Re: Bug#780201: new codename needed for oldstable (due to
squeeze-lts) when stable becomes oldstable
To: debian-...@lists.debian.org
On 10/03/2015, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
> -BEGIN
On Sat 24 Jan 2015 at 18:26:31 +, Brian wrote:
> I do think my experience is necessarily typical as the mirror is usually
A "not" in there as the third word would allow sense to be made of what
I wanted to say.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Sat 24 Jan 2015 at 10:22:26 -0700, Glenn English wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2015, at 8:05 AM, Brian wrote:
>
> > http://http.debian.net describes what the redirector does. In your case
> > it appears to have chosen a mirror which is not in a very healthy state;
> > try http://198.52.129.244 and s
On Jan 24, 2015, at 8:05 AM, Brian wrote:
> http://http.debian.net describes what the redirector does. In your case
> it appears to have chosen a mirror which is not in a very healthy state;
> try http://198.52.129.244 and see what you think.
>
> When I've had this problem I've found that the r
80]
>
> Is there trouble at Squeeze LTS? I didn't see these right after LTS
> started.
>
> I do get email from apticron from time to time about updates, so it's
> not completely dead. But I wonder what these mean, and if I might be
> missing some updates.
http://http
I'm getting messages like this:
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://http.debian.net/debian/dists/squeeze/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
> Unable to connect to http.debian.net:http: [IP: 198.52.129.244 80]
Is there trouble at Squeeze LTS? I didn't see these right after LTS start
On Mi, 03 dec 14, 13:44:31, Kenneth Dombrowski wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I just wanted to follow up with more info.
>
> I think these packages that want to stay with squeeze are pinned, for example:
>
> root@gilgamesh:~/tmp# apt-cache policy perl-base
> perl-base:
> Installed: 5.10.1-17squeeze6
>
On Mi, 03 dec 14, 13:05:11, Kenneth Dombrowski wrote:
> Hello debian users,
>
> I am having trouble dist-upgrading from squeeze-lts to wheezy.
>
> I have been following these instructions to upgrade from pre-lts squeeze
> (didn't find any specific ones for lts):
> https
Hi again,
I just wanted to follow up with more info.
I think these packages that want to stay with squeeze are pinned, for example:
root@gilgamesh:~/tmp# apt-cache policy perl-base
perl-base:
Installed: 5.10.1-17squeeze6
Candidate: 5.14.2-21+deb7u2
Version table:
5.14.2-21+deb7u2 0
Hello debian users,
I am having trouble dist-upgrading from squeeze-lts to wheezy.
I have been following these instructions to upgrade from pre-lts squeeze
(didn't find any specific ones for lts):
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.html
The problem ha
Howdy,
> A little concerning that one has to go through that.
> :-(
I feel releaved that I was not the only one with that problem :)
I took another approach, which worked for me: I installed in a virtual maschine
a fresh Squeeze version, added squeeze lts-repo and tar-zipped /etc/ap
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:42:11 + (UTC)
Angus MacGyver wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: squeeze-lts problem with debian's keyrings or apt
> >
> >
> > Am 02.10.2014 um 11:33 schrieb Angus MacGyver
> > :
> >
> > > I am also in that same po
> Subject: Re: squeeze-lts problem with debian's keyrings or apt
>
>
> Am 02.10.2014 um 11:33 schrieb Angus MacGyver
> :
>
> > I am also in that same position as Tobias'- and I suspect others as
> > well.
> >
> > So - has anyone got a meth
Am 02.10.2014 um 11:33 schrieb Angus MacGyver
:
> I am also in that same position as Tobias'- and I suspect others as well.
>
> So - has anyone got a method for a fix yet ?
I tried the following and it works for me:
I removed squeeze-lts from sources.list
apt-get update
a
I am also in that same position as Tobias'- and I suspect others as well.
So - has anyone got a method for a fix yet ?
I thought about pulling off debian-archive-keyring package, but that tells me I
could be about to really do damage to my system, so I (i think sensibly)
refrained.
I did try
> You have hit it.
Have I ?
> So you want the _archive_ keyring.
I have debian-archive-keyring installed as previously described. Unitl a few
days ago I was able to receive updates from squeeze-lts. But not anymore. I
tried installing a debian-archive-keyring from sid but this on
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 13:25:17 Tobias Weiß wrote:
> Yes I have ran apt-get update several times. Does squeeze-lts a another key
> signature than the former Squeeze repo? I guess so, because it came to life
> only a few month ago. The question how I can obtain the key sig
related errors if/when you run that
> step..
Yes I have ran apt-get update several times. Does squeeze-lts a another key
signature than the former Squeeze repo?
I guess so, because it came to life only a few month ago. The question how I
can obtain the key signature in querstion.
Tobias
On 9/30/14, Tobias Weiß wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> my apt on squeeze-lts complains that the updates could not be verified. This
> happens since the updates for apache were made a few days ago.
>
> I got the latest keyring package debian, at least I think so:
> root@web1-
Hello world,
my apt on squeeze-lts complains that the updates could not be verified. This
happens since the updates for apache were made a few days ago.
I got the latest keyring package debian, at least I think so:
root@web1-tk2:~# dpkg -l | grep keyring
ii debian-archive-keyring
On May 16, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Brian wrote:
> Much appreciated. Me and the OP wish we had read the page on the link
> you gave.
He does indeed. In answer to a question, I love to get links to a vast store of
data.
Thanks for the info.
--
Glenn English
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Using_squeeze-lts
>
> Important: Squeeze-LTS will only support i386 and amd64. Users of other
> architectures are encouraged to upgrade to Debian 7 ("wheezy").
>
> for binary packeges add this line: deb http://ftp.de.d
On 2014-05-16, Brian wrote:
>
> There is a wiki page on lts. Don't expect minor bugs to be addressed. I
> could be wrong about sources.list but I expected it to be the same as
> now.
>
>
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#Using_squeeze-lts
Important: Squeeze-LTS wil
On Thu 15 May 2014 at 16:19:18 -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> I see that squeeze is going to be supported a couple years more.
>
> But I'm not sure what that means. Is apticron going to work? What
> should be in /etc/apt/sources.list?
There is a wiki page on lts. Don't expect minor bugs to be ad
I see that squeeze is going to be supported a couple years more.
But I'm not sure what that means. Is apticron going to work? What should be in
/etc/apt/sources.list?
--
Glenn English
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
32 matches
Mail list logo
