On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Neal Hogan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>> on 20:34 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
>>> wrote:
>>> > on 19:30 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com)
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> on 20:34 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
>> wrote:
>> > on 19:30 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dr. Ed Morbi
on 20:34 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > on 19:30 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
> >> wrote:
> >> > on 18:11 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho..
on 20:34 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > on 19:30 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
> >> wrote:
> >> > I'll generally constrain my followup to t
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> on 19:30 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
>> wrote:
>> > I'll generally constrain my followup to the earlier thread rather than
>> > propogating two separate ones.
>> >
on 19:30 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > I'll generally constrain my followup to the earlier thread rather than
> > propogating two separate ones.
> >
> > on 18:11 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> I'll generally constrain my followup to the earlier thread rather than
> propogating two separate ones.
>
> on 18:11 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
>> wrote:
>> > on
I'll generally constrain my followup to the earlier thread rather than
propogating two separate ones.
on 18:11 Thu 17 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
> wrote:
> > on 21:01 Wed 16 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> I h
On 02/17/2011 07:11 PM, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
on 21:01 Wed 16 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
I have another thread started that is not getting much traffic given
the significance of the situation: installation.
Every installati
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> on 21:01 Wed 16 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> I have another thread started that is not getting much traffic given
>> the significance of the situation: installation.
>>
>> Every installation medium that I've tried fails.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:06 PM, David Christensen
wrote:
> On 02/15/2011 04:43 PM, Neal Hogan wrote:
>> I've tried the mini.iso and full net-iso for both the
>> gnu/bsd and gnu/linux system (i386) and no matter what I try it fails
>> to partition my drive.
>> eg.
>> "[!!] Partition disks
On 02/15/2011 04:43 PM, Neal Hogan wrote:
> I've tried the mini.iso and full net-iso for both the
> gnu/bsd and gnu/linux system (i386) and no matter what I try it fails
> to partition my drive.
>eg.
> "[!!] Partition disks
>Failed to create a file system
>The ufs file sy
on 21:01 Wed 16 Feb, Neal Hogan (nealho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have another thread started that is not getting much traffic given
> the significance of the situation: installation.
>
> Every installation medium that I've tried fails. Those trials include
> net-install-iso, mini-iso, full-diskOne
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:01:28 -0600, Neal Hogan wrote:
(...)
> What information do those that know anything about the install of the
> latest "stable" release need to know to fix this issue? There have been
> a few (if not several) other threads dealing with installation of
> squeeze. Was this te
On 02/16/2011 07:01 PM, Neal Hogan wrote:
Every installation medium that I've tried fails. Those trials include
net-install-iso, mini-iso, full-diskOne-iso. . .with both linux and
bsd kernels.
...
> HP pavilion (ze4400)
It sounds like you have a hardware problem. The following is an outline
o
I have another thread started that is not getting much traffic given
the significance of the situation: installation.
Every installation medium that I've tried fails. Those trials include
net-install-iso, mini-iso, full-diskOne-iso. . .with both linux and
bsd kernels.
What information do those th
16 matches
Mail list logo