Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 09:01:52PM -0600, Gary Turner wrote: > On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 08:07:49 -0800, Cam Ellison wrote: > > See auto-fill in help. My .emacs file contains: > > (add-hook 'text-mode-hook 'turn-on-auto-fill) > > "M-x auto-fill" toggles in and out of the mode. You can specify the >

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 08:07:49 -0800, Cam Ellison wrote: >* David Roundy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 07:15:08PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: >> > * Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 18:59]: >> > >> > > > [Hey Cam, you're not wrapping at 72, AFAICS. ] >> > >> > >

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 16. 2002 14:30]: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 08:13:48AM -0800, Cam Ellison wrote: > | * Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > | > > | > What version are you using? I'm running 2.01. > | > | So am I. > Wrong file, then. Put your config in /etc/spamassassin/loca

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 08:13:48AM -0800, Cam Ellison wrote: > | * Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > | > * Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 18:59]: > | > > | > | > > > I'm not using spamd, I'm firing off spamassassin with Procmail. But, > |

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 08:13:48AM -0800, Cam Ellison wrote: | * Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: | > * Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 18:59]: | > | | > > > I'm not using spamd, I'm firing off spamassassin with Procmail. But, | > > > I'm setting required_hits in /etc/spamass

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 18:59]: > > > > I'm not using spamd, I'm firing off spamassassin with Procmail. But, > > > I'm setting required_hits in /etc/spamassassin.prefs > > > I've got it set to 7 there, too. I'm not sure what's g

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* David Roundy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 07:15:08PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: > > * Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 18:59]: > > > > > > [Hey Cam, you're not wrapping at 72, AFAICS. ] > > > > > I'm using emacs, which is supposed to be wrapping at 70. At le

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 07:15:08PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: > * Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 18:59]: > > > > [Hey Cam, you're not wrapping at 72, AFAICS. ] > > > I'm using emacs, which is supposed to be wrapping at 70. At least, it > > tries to assure me of this every time I f

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 18:59]: > > [Hey Cam, you're not wrapping at 72, AFAICS. ] > I'm using emacs, which is supposed to be wrapping at 70. At least, it tries > to assure me of this every time I fire it up. :-P Surely I'm not the only one seeing the above as a single

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 13:43]: > > > * Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Hey, that's nifty. I adjusted some of my scoring and I only get one > > > or two that find their way through, but I'll surely zip those off to

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 15. 2002 13:43]: > * Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hey, that's nifty. I adjusted some of my scoring and I only get one > > or two that find their way through, but I'll surely zip those off to > > that address. [Hey Cam, you're not wrapping at 7

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 07:17:47AM -0800, Cam Ellison wrote: | * Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: | > | > Hey, that's nifty. I adjusted some of my scoring and I only get one or | > two that find their way through, but I'll surely zip those off to that | > address. | | Speaking of adjusting

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* Brian Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hey, that's nifty. I adjusted some of my scoring and I only get one or > two that find their way through, but I'll surely zip those off to that > address. > > Speaking of adjusting scoring, I have tried to raise required_hits, with no success. When

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 12. 2002 15:52]: [...] > | But, FWIW, I ran into the same problem with spamassassin and had to > | move my old .cf to /etc/spamassassin/local.cf and it seemed to go > | OK. (This was a few days ago.) > This should have happened automatically. It worked for me, bu

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:27:38AM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: | * martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 12. 2002 03:04]: | | > spamassassin has been restructured and updated. if you decide to | > update your system, be sure to test thoroughly. it will *not* work out | > of the box in all cases.

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:27:38AM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: > * martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 12. 2002 03:04]: > > spamassassin has been restructured and updated. if you decide to > > update your system, be sure to test thoroughly. it will *not* work out > > of the box in all cases. >

Re: spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 12. 2002 03:04]: > spamassassin has been restructured and updated. if you decide to > update your system, be sure to test thoroughly. it will *not* work out > of the box in all cases. I don't get this new structure woody's starting to use with some confi

spamassassin. CAREFUL ON UPGRADE

folks, spamassassin has been restructured and updated. if you decide to update your system, be sure to test thoroughly. it will *not* work out of the box in all cases. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]