Maintaining many backported sources (was Re: spamassassin vs. html emails)

2003-10-10 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Thursday 09 October 2003 21:51, Vineet Kumar wrote: > That way, you know exactly which packages are being upgraded to > unofficial versions. Sometimes, with large collections of backports, > it becomes more difficult to track which packages come from where, > and which are required for what. I

Re: spamassassin vs. html emails

2003-10-09 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Kjetil Kjernsmo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031009 04:20]: > On Thursday 09 October 2003 06:01, Will Trillich wrote: > > i get a LOT of spam that slips thru spamassassin -- > > > > it's multipart/alternative, but the only alternative is html, > > which i would hope would get a positive hit under "html-o

Re: spamassassin vs. html emails

2003-10-09 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Thursday 09 October 2003 06:01, Will Trillich wrote: > i get a LOT of spam that slips thru spamassassin -- > > it's multipart/alternative, but the only alternative is html, > which i would hope would get a positive hit under "html-only > email" test. > > the end of all the headers looks thus: >

spamassassin vs. html emails

2003-10-08 Thread Will Trillich
i get a LOT of spam that slips thru spamassassin -- it's multipart/alternative, but the only alternative is html, which i would hope would get a positive hit under "html-only email" test. the end of all the headers looks thus: Content-Type: multipart/alternative;