On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:30:04AM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> i also read the documentation. it mentions that per-user settings is a
> security risk if spamd is run. so, i will prefer not to allow per user
> settings although i am the only user of the system.
>
> what file to i edit if per
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:12:16AM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:34:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:59:45PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> > > 1.how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
> > > instance, de
On 21 Feb 2003, Glyn Millington wrote:
> Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I actually find spamassassin runs pretty slowly on my K6-2/500MHz 384MB
> > machine (I know it's not real fast but not a dinosaur either). It takes
> > about 5-10 seconds per message, so before I started fil
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:01:19PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> >>>1. how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
> >>>instance, debain mailing list, i understand, is already processed for
> >>>spam. no use spamming it again
> >
> >
> >Maybe not necessary, but, unless your mailse
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:11:00AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> At 2003-02-21T13:29:45Z, Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Assuming that SpamAssassin is configured to read per-user settings from
> ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, edit that file to add:
this is interesting. i have an /
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:34:16PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:59:45PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> > 1. how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
> > instance, debain mailing list, i understand, is already processed for
> > spam. no use spammi
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:49:25PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> * Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-21 14:47]:
> >
> > 1. how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
> > instance, debain mailing list, i understand, is already processed for
> > spam. no use spamming it
On February 21, 2003 05:26 pm, Levi Waldron wrote:
> that using spamd would be so much faster. I could switch to fetchmail for
> the sake of spamd, although reading through the documentation I see that
> the spamc daemon could also improve my performance without changing my mail
> setup at all. I
On February 21, 2003 01:13 pm, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> I bet you're not running spamd, which means you're taking the hit for
> starting up perl on every message scanned. That would hurt pretty
> bad, now that I think about it...
You're correct. I'm using kmail to fetch from POP3 mailservers and
At 2003-02-21T17:16:37Z, Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It takes about 5-10 seconds per message, so before I started filtering my
> debian-user messages before processing, it was prohibitive.
I see the same thing on my GHz+ Athlon server. However, the process spends
about 99.9% of th
Dave Sherohman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:11:00AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-02-21T13:29:45Z, Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
1. how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
instance, debain mailing list, i understand, is already processed for
sp
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:16:37PM -0500, Levi Waldron wrote:
> On February 21, 2003 11:24 am, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > Maybe not necessary, but, unless your mailserver is horribly slow,
> > it'll be done so quick that it's not going to hurt anything anyhow.
>
> I actually find spamassassin runs
Levi Waldron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I actually find spamassassin runs pretty slowly on my K6-2/500MHz 384MB
> machine (I know it's not real fast but not a dinosaur either). It takes
> about 5-10 seconds per message, so before I started filtering my debian-user
> messages before processi
On February 21, 2003 11:24 am, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> Maybe not necessary, but, unless your mailserver is horribly slow,
> it'll be done so quick that it's not going to hurt anything anyhow.
I actually find spamassassin runs pretty slowly on my K6-2/500MHz 384MB
machine (I know it's not real fas
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:11:00AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> At 2003-02-21T13:29:45Z, Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1. how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
> > instance, debain mailing list, i understand, is already processed for
> > spam. no use sp
At 2003-02-21T13:29:45Z, Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Assuming that SpamAssassin is configured to read per-user settings from
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, edit that file to add:
> 1. how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
> instance, debain mailing list, i
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:59:45PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> 1.how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
> instance, debain mailing list, i understand, is already processed for
> spam. no use spamming it again
Rearrange your exim filter so that it delivers such mes
* Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-21 14:47]:
>
> 1.how to i tell spamassassin *not to* process some messages? for
> instance, debain mailing list, i understand, is already processed for
> spam. no use spamming it again
>
whitelist
> 2.how do i tell spamassassin *not to* co
hello all
i recently installed spamassassin and it is not only tagging messages as
spam but also converting all attachments into inline text.
i just got two pdf documents as inline texts incorrectly marked as spam.
i have three questions on spamassassin:
1. how to i tell spamassassin *not
19 matches
Mail list logo
