Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-24 Thread Matthias
Hello, On Jul 24, 9:30 am, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Write a small do-nothing program that lets me test the USR & HUP > signals. Make it simple enough that a poor C programmer can > understand it. I'll compile and run it, then send you the results. Thank you. Here is the basic

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-24 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/24/07 01:39, Matthias wrote: > Hello, > >> But that means that Debian Developers are the way that "Linux" (the >> kernel? libc?, something else?) are deeply changing The Way Unix Works. >> >> And I just don't believe they'd do that. For one th

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias
Hello, > But that means that Debian Developers are the way that "Linux" (the > kernel? libc?, something else?) are deeply changing The Way Unix Works. > > And I just don't believe they'd do that. For one thing, they're all > pretty busy, and making such deep changes to every new version of > ups

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-23 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/07 23:04, Matthias wrote: > Hello, > > On Jul 23, 3:30 pm, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> The issue is not with debian iteself, but rather my implementation of >>> signal handling. My feeling is that in trying to write code fo

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias
Hello, On Jul 23, 3:30 pm, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The issue is not with debian iteself, but rather my implementation of > > signal handling. My feeling is that in trying to write code for a > > large cross-section (debian, BSD, GNU), I missed something that debian > > GNU? H

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-23 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/07 14:04, Matthias wrote: > Hello, > > On Jul 23, 6:10 am, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> this. The biggest issue seems to be in signal handling. I have been >>> told that certain version of Debian do not respond to the USR a

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias
Hello, On Jul 23, 6:10 am, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this. The biggest issue seems to be in signal handling. I have been > > told that certain version of Debian do not respond to the USR and HUP > > sugnals. > > What do you mean by "Debian" doesn't respond to signals? A lot of

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-23 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/07 00:00, Mar Matthias Darin wrote: [snip] > this. The biggest issue seems to be in signal handling. I have been > told that certain version of Debian do not respond to the USR and HUP > sugnals. What do you mean by "Debian" doesn't respond

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias
Hello, On Jul 23, 2:20 am, steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > quite interesting! but: what does this program add to spamassassin? spamassassin, like dspam, can use the X-DynaStop tag to train on spam. Spam Zombies are by far the largest group in the Dynamic IP address range (approx 75%+), wher

Re: Testing anti spam software

2007-07-23 Thread steef
Mar Matthias Darin wrote: Hello, Please forgive me if this is an inappropriate area for this request. I have written an anti-spam tool for linux called DynaStop. It works with Exim and procmail on the limited number of versions I have tested, but I am having trouble verifyng its operations on De

Testing anti spam software

2007-07-22 Thread Mar Matthias Darin
Hello, Please forgive me if this is an inappropriate area for this request. I have written an anti-spam tool for linux called DynaStop. It works with Exim and procmail on the limited number of versions I have tested, but I am having trouble verifyng its operations on Debian. I've have multipl

Re: Exim (was Re: spam software)

2003-09-27 Thread Russell Shaw
Ross Boylan wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:43:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: ... all From and Reply-To headers only on mail that is sent out the smtp transport to my dialup isp. However, exim3 doesn't let you rewrite envelope addresses on per-transport rewrites. The only other option is to use

Re: Exim (was Re: spam software)

2003-09-27 Thread Ross Boylan
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:43:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: ... > all From and Reply-To headers only on mail that is sent out the smtp > transport to my dialup isp. However, exim3 doesn't let you rewrite > envelope addresses on per-transport rewrites. The only other option > is to use the rewrite

Exim (was Re: spam software)

2003-09-26 Thread Russell Shaw
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:24:55AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: | Paul Johnson wrote: | >On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:28:49AM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: | > | >>Thanks.. I got it. I was reading the docs and it seems there is no | >>configuration/install help for sendmail ??

Re: spam software

2003-09-26 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:24:55AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote: | Paul Johnson wrote: | >On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:28:49AM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: | > | >>Thanks.. I got it. I was reading the docs and it seems there is no | >>configuration/install help for sendmail ?? Is there any docs/help for |

Re: spam software

2003-09-26 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 07:25:17AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: | Replying on list since we're still on topic. Please avoid top-posting. | | On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:41:35AM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: | > Hi Paul, | > | > Thanks for the info. Now where can I get this spamassassin for Debian I | >

Re: spam software

2003-09-26 Thread Russell Shaw
Paul Johnson wrote: Please reply on list. Please do not top post. http://learn.to/quote/ On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:28:49AM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: Thanks.. I got it. I was reading the docs and it seems there is no configuration/install help for sendmail ?? Is there any docs/help for sendmail

Re: spam software

2003-09-26 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please reply on list. Please do not top post. http://learn.to/quote/ On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:28:49AM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: > Thanks.. I got it. I was reading the docs and it seems there is no > configuration/install help for sendmail ?? Is th

Re: spam software

2003-09-26 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Replying on list since we're still on topic. Please avoid top-posting. On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:41:35AM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thanks for the info. Now where can I get this spamassassin for Debian I > checked at packages.debian.o

Re: spam software

2003-09-26 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:44:43PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: > We are getting lot of spam mails.. I am using sendmail on debian box and > trying to load spamassassin software from au.spamassaaain.org. Is there > anything better I can use or anyone has

Re: spam software

2003-09-25 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:44:43PM -0400, Vivek Kumar wrote: > Hi all, > > We are getting lot of spam mails.. I am using sendmail on debian box and > trying to load spamassassin software from au.spamassaaain.org. Is there > anything better I can use or anyone has experienxe with this software ?? >

spam software

2003-09-25 Thread Vivek Kumar
Hi all, We are getting lot of spam mails.. I am using sendmail on debian box and trying to load spamassassin software from au.spamassaaain.org. Is there anything better I can use or anyone has experienxe with this software ?? Kindly share your thoughts.. Thanks a lot.. -- Vivek Kumar -- To U