Ooo2.0 space concern solved

2005-10-26 Thread Mark Grieveson
Thanks to everyone for their help on this one. I discovered that the space concern, and the timing of my installing the OOo2.0 program, was merely a co-incidence. I had installed a backup program, backup-manager, which, unbeknownst to me, was writing backups in the /var/archives directory

Re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-25 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
Mark Grieveson wrote: Also, an hour ago I entered the command "du --max-depth=1 -m/ | sort -g", and it's still pondering this. Did you check your .xsession-errors file? For me whenever something like this happens, the culprit usually is .xsession-errors. raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi ht

Re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:33:31PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: > kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mark Grieveson wrote: > >> > >> 300 MB of space would have been fine. However, before the install, > >> I had over 10 (ten) GBs of space left on my 40 GB drive. Afterward, > >> I

Re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Bill Wohler
kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mark Grieveson wrote: >> >> 300 MB of space would have been fine. However, before the install, >> I had over 10 (ten) GBs of space left on my 40 GB drive. Afterward, >> I was down to 1 (one) GB left; so, something went wrong somewhere. >> Is ther

Re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Paul E Condon
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:35:54AM -0400, Mark Grieveson wrote: ... > down to 1 (one) GB left; so, something went wrong somewhere. Is there a > way to list files by filesize? A program, or command similar to "ls" > that lists files, but sorts them in order of filesize? Try running the follow

Re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Andreas Rippl
gt;removal to see what synaptic would report). As always, all > >suggestion/comments appreciated. > >--Mark > > > > > > > >To sort files in the order of the size use > >du --max-depth=1 -m / | sort -g > > > >replace / with the corresponding direct

Re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:58:11AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > Mark Grieveson wrote: > > > > > > >300 MB of space would have been fine. However, before the install, I > >had over 10 (ten) GBs of space left on my 40 GB drive. Afterward, I > >was down to 1 (one) GB left; so, something we

Re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Andy Streich
o see what synaptic would report). As always, all > > suggestion/comments appreciated. > > --Mark > > > > > > > > To sort files in the order of the size use > > du --max-depth=1 -m / | sort -g > > > > replace / with the corresponding directory.

Re: space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Mirco Sippel
Mark Grieveson schrieb: From this, I determined that, for some reason, the var directory now occupied over 18 GBs. So, I subsequently run the command debian:/home/mark# du --max-depth=1 -m /var | sort -g, which indicated that most of the space was in /var/archives. The contents are: debian:

space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Mark Grieveson
I found that, for some reason, a couple of hours after installing OpenOffice.org 2.0 from the rpm source via alien, that I had no space on my computer. I had had eighteen GB before. Someone suggested that I check via the command "du --max-depth=1 -m / | sort -g". So, I did, and here was the

re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-25 Thread Mark Grieveson
/ | sort -g replace / with the corresponding directory. More information can be found in 'man du', 'man sort' raju Thanks for this suggestion. This space concern happened shortly after I installed OpenOffice.org 2.0, but that may be a co-incidence. I also turned on a

Re: OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-24 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
Mark Grieveson wrote: 300 MB of space would have been fine. However, before the install, I had over 10 (ten) GBs of space left on my 40 GB drive. Afterward, I was down to 1 (one) GB left; so, something went wrong somewhere. Is there a way to list files by filesize? A program, or command

OOo2.0 space concern

2005-10-24 Thread Mark Grieveson
I did this, and it works quite well. But it took up a huge amount of space on my harddrive. -Mark I doubt that the "unofficial" Debian distribution is any smaller. The OOo2.0 distribution takes ~284MB (OOo2.0 shipped with stripped executable files) compared to ~219MB for OOo1.1.5 (which was