Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

Cater Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 6:22 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 06:55:30PM +, Gregory McPherran wrote: > Hi, > > This shows the new security line form as: > DebianBullseye - Deb

Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:52:18AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:22:17AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Take the opportunity to at least upgrade to Debian 9 and, ideally, 10. > > Debian 11 should be here inside a month - if you can get to 10, you'll > > have at least

Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:22:17AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: Take the opportunity to at least upgrade to Debian 9 and, ideally, 10. Debian 11 should be here inside a month - if you can get to 10, you'll have at least a further year of security support for 10. Worth noting that skipping re

Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 06:55:30PM +, Gregory McPherran wrote: > Hi, > > This shows the new security line form as: > DebianBullseye - Debian > Wiki > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security

Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

On Lu, 12 iul 21, 18:55:30, Gregory McPherran wrote: > Hi, > > This shows the new security line form as: > DebianBullseye - Debian > Wiki > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-secur

Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 06:55:30PM +, Gregory McPherran wrote: >Is one of"http://security.debian.org/debian-security";or >"http://security.debian.org"; the correct format ? > >Or is the "debian-security" portion optional ? I don't think `debian-security` in the URL suffix is optio

APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates - Documentation Discrepancy

M To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates Hi, This shows the new security line form as: DebianBullseye - Debian Wiki<https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBullseye?highlight=%28CategoryRelease%29#New_Features> deb http://security.debian.or

Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: Try both and see which one works. If the wiki is wrong, edit the wiki so that it's correct. (Then hope some jerk doesn't revert your changes.) There's only one person acting like a jerk here.

Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 06:55:30PM +, Gregory McPherran wrote: > > This shows the new security line form as: > > DebianBullseye - Debian > > Wiki > > deb http://security.debian.org

Re: APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 06:55:30PM +, Gregory McPherran wrote: > This shows the new security line form as: > DebianBullseye - Debian > Wiki > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-

APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates

Hi, This shows the new security line form as: DebianBullseye - Debian Wiki deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main This shows the new security line form as: sourc

Re: sources.list line

Antonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I installed the base system of potato from a Win/Dos partition >on local hard disk. Now, I`m tryeing to install the Packages (from the >same partition) using the dselect. When I am updating (second step of >the dselect), it protest about the line one of t

sources.list line

I installed the base system of potato from a Win/Dos partition on local hard disk. Now, I`m tryeing to install the Packages (from the same partition) using the dselect. When I am updating (second step of the dselect), it protest about the line one of the "sources.list" file: deb

RE: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

and landed in the right place in apache build dir. any other hints you might have gratefully rec'd :-) > -Original Message- > From: Eugene Teo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 April 2000 16:38 > To: Dominic Blythe; Paul McHale; Debian-User > Subject: Re: sources.

Re: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

CTED] > > Sent: 28 April 2000 16:32 > > To: Dominic Blythe; Paul McHale; Debian-User > > Subject: Re: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source > > > > > > IMHO, apache should be compiled by hand. from there, you can > > control the dynamic modules an

RE: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

yeah. right on. i'll agree even more when i get mod_perl compiled in successfully ;-) > -Original Message- > From: Eugene Teo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 April 2000 16:32 > To: Dominic Blythe; Paul McHale; Debian-User > Subject: Re: sources.list line to

Re: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

hours now... > > of course it's the uninstall that will be the asspain > > > -Original Message- > > From: Paul McHale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 28 April 2000 16:06 > > To: Dominic Blythe; Debian-User > > Subject: RE: sources.list line to

RE: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 April 2000 16:06 > To: Dominic Blythe; Debian-User > Subject: RE: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source > > > I originally had trouble getting apt-get to delete apache. > For some reason > it refused to. I then went back to d

Re: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 10:45:27AM -0400, Paul McHale wrote: > > Does anyone know the line in sources.list for retrieving apache source? In > the man page, it mentions adding deb-src to the line. I can't seem to get > the syntax correct. Does anyone have an example line? Here's mone: [EMAIL

RE: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

well at least you got dselect to do it, i had to go back to dpkg. > -Original Message- > From: Paul McHale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 April 2000 16:01 > To: Dominic Blythe; Debian-User > Subject: RE: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source >

RE: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

-7610 Double E Solutions Mobile: 937-371-2828 4912 Effingham Fax:413-215-3232 Dayton, Ohio 45431 -- > -Original Message- > From: Dominic Blythe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 10:50 AM > To: Paul McHale; Debian-User > Subje

RE: sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

why not just download it from apache? i'm not being glib, i really want to know why not, cos that's what i did and i'm always looking for better (different) ways to do things. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Does anyone know the line in sources.list for retrieving > apache source? In > the man pa

sources.list line to support retrieval of apache source

Does anyone know the line in sources.list for retrieving apache source? In the man page, it mentions adding deb-src to the line. I can't seem to get the syntax correct. Does anyone have an example line? many thanks, paul -- Paul McHale Work: 937-253-7610 Double E Solutions

Re: correct apt sources.list line for non-us?

*- On 30 Dec, matt garman wrote about "correct apt sources.list line for non-us?" > > What is the correct line to use in /etc/apt/sources.list for the > unstable non-us files? > > I tried the following: > > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non

correct apt sources.list line for non-us?

What is the correct line to use in /etc/apt/sources.list for the unstable non-us files? I tried the following: deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-US but I always get a 404 not found error. What I am I doing wrong? Thanks, Matt