Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> If you are running "eternal testing" (you never convert it to a stable
> release), then you HAVE NO security support. None. There is no line
> you should use for security, because there isn't any security.
false. security updates come via unstable uploads that
migra
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
...
> 'testing' receives security updates via 'unstable', there is no separate=20
> repository.
>
> https://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
ok, thanks! :) i am fine with that.
i had an old line in the sources.list that no longer
was useful. got rid of that, clean
> >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
Which says "security suite renamed to bullseye-security (from
buster/updates)".
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 05:44:44PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> >> wishlist for an alias to testing so nobody who=20
> >> follows testing will need to keep changing their
> >> so
On Du, 05 iul 20, 19:31:54, songbird wrote:
>
> i want the line that goes into the /etc/apt/sources.list
> file for testing security updates.
'testing' receives security updates via 'unstable', there is no separate
repository.
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
Kind regards,
Andrei
On 6/7/20 9:31 am, songbird wrote:
some time ago there was a change made to the sources
list names for security and i never saw the one for
testing come by (i may have missed it) so i'm asking...:)
Good afternoon
This is what my sources.list looked like when I first installed testing
ear
Dan Ritter wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
...
>> >> wishlist for an alias to testing so nobody who=20
>> >> follows testing will need to keep changing their
>> >> sources.list every time there is a release.
>> >
>> > What more than the 'testing' alias are you looking for?
>>
songbird wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:38:05, songbird wrote:
> >> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >> > On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >> >>=3D20
> >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
> >> >
> >> > Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm su
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:38:05, songbird wrote:
>> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> > On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> >>=3D20
>> >> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
>> >
>> > Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm subscribed to -doc.
>>=20
>> wish
On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:38:05, songbird wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >>=20
> >> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
> >
> > Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm subscribed to -doc.
>
> wishlist for an alias to testing so nobo
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>>=20
>> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
>
> Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm subscribed to -doc.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
wishlist for an alias to testing so nobody who
follows testing will need
On Du, 05 iul 20, 09:52:25, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/931785
Oups, completely forgot about that, even though I'm subscribed to -doc.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 10:34:30AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 05 iul 20, 08:14:28, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I found several proposals for thre security entry
> >
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
> > deb http://security.debian.o
On Du, 05 iul 20, 08:14:28, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
>
> I found several proposals for thre security entry
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main contrib
> non-free
[fixed wrapping]
> deb
Am 05. Jul, 2020 schwätzte Pierre Frenkiel so:
moin moin Pierre,
I found several proposals for thre security entry
deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main contrib
non-free
deb http://deb.debian.or
On 7/5/2020 8:14 AM, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
hi,
I found several proposals for thre security entry
deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main
contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ b
hi,
I found several proposals for thre security entry
deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main
contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ buster/updates main
which one must be chose
On 29/01/12 21:51, Colin wrote:
> Hi all,
> After reading the security support on testing[1], I was thinking if I
> would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
> then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the security
> ones?
> Or should I just use 'deb http://s
On Du, 29 ian 12, 15:17:06, Colin wrote:
>
> Right.
> Then I could check debian-testing-security-announce@ to check which
> ones were fast tracked?
> Although the last post on that list is from Feb 2011 acording to the
> archives [1].
Debian Testing Security Advisories are used only when the upda
On 1/29/12, Paul E Condon wrote:
> OP wouldn't have asked the question unless he were somewhat worried
> that each choice had consequences, which, for him, were unknown and
> therefore unintended. Because he has asked the question, I think OP
> is, like me, a person who wants a system that basical
On 20120129_122817, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
>
> > After reading the security support on testing[1], I was thinking if I
> > would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
> > then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the secu
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Christofer C. Bell
wrote:
> To answer your other question, security updates for Testing move through
> from Unstable like any other update except for being fast tracked:
Right.
Then I could check debian-testing-security-announce@ to check which
ones were fast trac
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Colin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
> > This depends on what you intend to do when wheezy becomes stable. Do
> > you want to continue to use testing forever, or do you want to have a
>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
> This depends on what you intend to do when wheezy becomes stable. Do
> you want to continue to use testing forever, or do you want to have a
> system that remains basically unchanged for a long time?
On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
> After reading the security support on testing[1], I was thinking if I
> would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
> then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the security
> ones?
No. Also, wheezy and testing are cu
Hi all,
After reading the security support on testing[1], I was thinking if I
would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the security
ones?
Or should I just use 'deb http://security.debian.org testing/updates
main cont
25 matches
Mail list logo
