Brad Alexander (stor...@gmail.com on 2011-11-16 10:07 -0500):
> Actually, Andrei, that will fit puppet well. I was just looking for
> methodologies, and I think that you and Tong pointed out a couple of
> important points. First, never cross the streams on stable. I'm
> guessing here that both of y
Actually, Andrei, that will fit puppet well. I was just looking for
methodologies, and I think that you and Tong pointed out a couple of
important points. First, never cross the streams on stable. I'm guessing
here that both of you probably use the codename (e.g. squeeze, lenny,
wheezy, etc) and no
On Ma, 15 nov 11, 17:58:16, Brad Alexander wrote:
>
> The third option is to dispense with a sources.list altogether, and put
> release-specific .list files in sources.list.d. Of course, you could have
> permutations of the above. Did I miss any options?
This is what I do now on all machines:
(p
Hey all,
I've been doing the same thing the same way, but I would be interested to
hear what others are doing and the pros and cons of the various approaches.
Traditionally, I have replaced /etc/apt/sources.list with a universal one
that includes stanzas for stable, testing, unstable, and in some
4 matches
Mail list logo
