ed that a new feature in apt stops apt from accepting the
kind of hhtp(s) redirects sourceforge now uses. This at least explains
the initially odd observation that the sf repo still works with outdated
versions of apt.
So it looks like (at least for now) it is simply not possible to use
debian reposi
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:57:08 +0200
Michael Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just encountered an odd problem with a repo hosted on sourceforge,
> when calling apt-get update with this repo enabled in the sources.list
> I ended with a 301 error. Apparently this happens because sourceforg
Hi,
I just encountered an odd problem with a repo hosted on sourceforge, when
calling apt-get update with this repo enabled in the sources.list I ended
with a 301 error. Apparently this happens because sourceforge dropped its
http service and now uses https exclusively. It took me a while to find
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:01:08 -0400, Dan wrote:
> I was wondering how to download a binary in a secured way from
> sourceforge.
Uh? :-?
> With debian it is very straightforward, you download it, check the
> md5sum or sha1 and then check the signature.
>
> In sourceforge I see
Hi,
I was wondering how to download a binary in a secured way from sourceforge.
With debian it is very straightforward, you download it, check the
md5sum or sha1 and then check the signature.
In sourceforge I see that you can find the md5 and the sha1 but they
are both transmited with http and
Hello,
i'm looking for locally installable. I don't primarily care for the
language it's implemented it but I'd like it to be somewhat consistent
(which disqualifies gforge). trac, redmine are too limited as in they
don't provide all of:
* self project registration
* mailing lists
* auto creat
"They'd never do that!" Do you think MS cares
> one whit about Sourceforge other than to destroy it? Do they care one
> whit about the ISO standards process?
What's forcing you to host your project on Sourceforge?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man
On Oct 2, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
...AND they've obviously cozied up to MS...
What evidence do you have that they've "cozied up to" MS? So far all
we know is that MS has bought some ad space from them.
I see a lot of knee-jerk overreaction in this thread, but not much else
ed code into some high-profile
projects.
Before someone says, "They'd never do that!" Do you think MS cares
one whit about Sourceforge other than to destroy it? Do they care one
whit about the ISO standards process?
- Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB
MS free advertising.
> Suffice it to say, I am not pleased that Free Software developers are
> being force fed MS advertising and that my name and email address are
> being associated with MS.
>
> I don't intend this as a flame war, but I just want to alert anyone
> involv
rce fed MS advertising and that my name and email address are
being associated with MS.
I don't intend this as a flame war, but I just want to alert anyone
involved in a project hosted at SourceForge that this being done.
- Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | S
Kevin Buhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The final alternative is to employ ugly per-MUA hacks, like the
> "use_from" Mutt option that Andrew mentioned.
Whoops... It looks like Andrew's descriptions were a little mixed up.
According to the Mutt manual, it isn't "use_from" that does this, it's
"
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> When I send from thunderbird from any machine, it works as it is
> connecting directly to santiago. If I use mutt on santiago, it works
> fine there as well since it is running an instance of Postfix which can
> be reached from the public intern
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:06:04PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> what does your "From" header look like? Is it supposed to show a
> return address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would assume not, that it
> should show a return address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The point is, are
> you setting your Fro
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:08:57PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> It appears that the Sourceforge mailing list server apparently tries to
> connect back to the host or MX for the host listed in the Return-Path
> header. My network is setup like this:
>
> miami -> s
It appears that the Sourceforge mailing list server apparently tries to
connect back to the host or MX for the host listed in the Return-Path
header. My network is setup like this:
miami -> santiago (smarthost) -> Internet
Now, miami runs postfix, but it is not accessible fr
Am I correct in concluding that the Debian package dhttpd is nothing
to do with the package of the same name on dhttpd.sourceforge.net? And
that if I want access logging I've either got to use a different http
server or hack dhttpd (Debian version)?
--
Pigeon
Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key he
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:29:12AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> does sourceforge really need to depend on exim and proftp? wouldn't
> other mail resp. ftp servers be enough?
>
> since both exim and proftp conflict with other mail resp. ftp servers
> it means that s
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:29:12AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> does sourceforge really need to depend on exim and proftp? wouldn't
> other mail resp. ftp servers be enough?
Isn't that broken? Shouldn't the dependency be:
Depends: exim | mail-transport-agent
like most
On 11 Jan 03 08:29:12 GMT, Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>does sourceforge really need to depend on exim and proftp? wouldn't
> other mail resp. ftp servers be enough?
Not to mention apache | apache-ssl (won't any other web server do?)
and xenu-preserve
does sourceforge really need to depend on exim and proftp? wouldn't
other mail resp. ftp servers be enough?
since both exim and proftp conflict with other mail resp. ftp servers
it means that sourceforge cannot be installed if I want to use e.g.
postfix for my mail server...
TIA
hello,
I did install the sourceforge package in my Debian (unstable) box.
It's running fine, but when i try add one user to ldap, i can't. I
receive one error message about sintaxe. Anybody knows about error in
php scripts in this package? Or knows php script to help me with debu
I'm trying to try out the sourceforge package, but during the configuration it
errors at ldap_bind. I'm know nothing about ldap, so I'm wondering if someone
could tell how to fix thís problem. The install goes as follows:
running dpkg --pending --configure ...
Setting up sour
On 22-Apr-2002 Marcelo Leal wrote:
> hi,
>
> i did tryed install the sourceforge package in my machine (woody), and
> does not works. sorry by the english... i hope tha you understand me...
>:)
> then, i did heard about changes in post installation scripts, for it
> works...
hi,
i did tryed install the sourceforge package in my machine (woody), and
does not works. sorry by the english... i hope tha you understand me...
:)
then, i did heard about changes in post installation scripts, for it
works...
did you know about it?
did you know how can i install the sourceforge
For some reason I cannot get ldap to work correctly so sourceforge does
not install.
My output is:
You'll see some debugging info during this installation.
Do not worry unless told otherwise.
Creating initial Sourceforge database from files.
Processing /usr/lib/sourceforge/db/SourceForg
When I do a dpk-reconfigure libpam-ldap and I set the root login =
cn=admin, dc=< ?? > What do I put for dc?
If I am using debian.org as my ldap server location would I have
cn=admin, dc=debian, dc=com?
I am confused, after I configured the ldap again I got ldap_bind:
Invalid credentials wh
?
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> Setting up sourceforge (2.5-14) ...
> You'll see some debugging info during this installation.
> Do not worry unless told otherwise.
> It seems your database upgrade went well and smoothly. That's cool.
> Please enjoy using Debian Source
Hi,
The problem with it connecting and installing the database works good
now, but it cannot connect to the ldap server? What is going on, would
it be due to a config problem, or is it the package?
Thanks,
Matt
Setting up sourceforge (2.5-14) ...
You'll see some debugging info during
Has anyone installed sourceforge with the deb package?
I am installing it and this is my output:
Setting up sourceforge (2.5-14) ...
You'll see some debugging info during this installation.
Do not worry unless told otherwise.
DBI->connect(dbname=sourceforge;host=192.168.10.2) failed: fe_
Is it coming back? Do we know when?
Thus spake Daniel T. Chen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Afaik, for the moment latinhouse no longer mirrors the Debian section.
>
> ---
> Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Robert L
Afaik, for the moment latinhouse no longer mirrors the Debian section.
---
Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> Interesting:
>
> Hit http://non-us.debian.org woody/non-US/non-free Release
> Faile
Interesting:
Hit http://non-us.debian.org woody/non-US/non-free Release
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.sourceForge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/stable/latest/distribution/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-i386/Packages
404 Not Found [IP: 152.2.210.121 80]
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree.
Hi everyone,
I am sure someone have tried to compile mga kernel modules from the
source from dri.sourceforge.net. But in my case, it didn't compile and it said
something about next is not a member of something. I just download the source
from there and compile. I tried the 4.0.3 sour
"francisco m . neto" wrote:
> I one does so, and installs the package using dpkg, won't the
> apt-get database get dependency problems when one tries to install
> some other package that depends on the first package?
The apt-get database and the dpkg database are one and the same.
Actually
francisco m . neto wrote:
> I one does so, and installs the package using dpkg, won't the
> apt-get database get dependency problems when one tries to install
> some other package that depends on the first package?
Well, no. Apt wouldn't have caught on very well or even been accepted
into de
I have a doubt about this:
> Do you absolutely have to use apt-get to isntall it? You could just use
>
> dpkg -i packagename.deb
>
> while you're in the the directory the package is in.
I one does so, and installs the package using dpkg, won't the
apt-get database get depend
Am Samstag, 24. März 2001 01:27 schrieb Phil Reardon,,,:
> What line would I add to sources.list so I apt-get it from my home
> directory?
Try dpkg --install package.deb
--
bye
Joerg
GPG-Keyid: 0x1120D31B
Fingerprint: A3D2 83A4 535D A826 F2AA 4348 8BDD 849C 1120 D31B
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Reardon,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 11:27 AM
Subject: SourceForge binaries
> Hi. I want to apt-get a .deb file I downloaded from SourceForge
> (gpltrans) It is not available from the debian archive or any mir
Hi. I want to apt-get a .deb file I downloaded from SourceForge
(gpltrans) It is not available from the debian archive or any mirrors.
What line would I add to sources.list so I apt-get it from my home
directory?
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 05:45:14PM +0100, Patrick Schnorbus wrote:
> I´ve a problem with SourceForge. I have a registered project and I want to
> login via ssh to upload my project´s website but something goes wrong. I read
> the documentation but I´ve know idea why there is this pro
I´ve a problem with SourceForge. I have a registered project and I want to
login via ssh to upload my project´s website but something goes wrong. I read
the documentation but I´ve know idea why there is this problem. Can anybody
help me?
thanx, Patrick
PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sam> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm trying to loging to SourceForge via ssl using Mozila in woody.
> It's
> >> refusing my connection. I
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 13:09:29 -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> You need the PAM module to use SSL.
PAM == Pluggable Authentication Modules != PSM == Personal Security Manager
You need PSM to use SSL with mozilla.
> Check the Mozilla website.
Or /usr/share/doc/mozilla/psm-helper
HTH,
Ray
--
Obsig:
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sam> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Robert L. Harris wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to loging to SourceForge via ssl using Mozila in woody. It's
>>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Robert L. Harris wrote:
>
>
> I'm trying to loging to SourceForge via ssl using Mozila in woody.
> It's refusing my connection. I've verified my pass and used netscape 475
> to verify the site is up. Anyone have any ide
I'm trying to loging to SourceForge via ssl using Mozila in woody.
It's refusing my connection. I've verified my pass and used netscape 475
to verify the site is up. Anyone have any ideas? Does Mozilla not
accept SSL yet
Brent Harding wrote:
>
> I don't think there's much of anything for linux to do streaming audio,
> (I mean broadcast it, plenty to play it, freeamp, mpg123, etc). There's
> nothing that has the ability to have a playlist that fades from 1 song to
> another like winamp in windows could. I've hear
ortly.
Schalk Klee
-Original Message-
From: Brent Harding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 August 2000 04:42
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: I've got me a sourceforge project for something I really don't
think exists, but haven't much a
> nothing that has the ability to have a playlist that fades from 1 song to
apt-get install xmms-crossfade
I don't think there's much of anything for linux to do
streaming audio,
(I mean broadcast it, plenty to play it, freeamp, mpg123, etc). There's
nothing that has the ability to have a playlist that fades from 1 song to
another like winamp in windows could. I've heard of icec
51 matches
Mail list logo
