quot; way to use the kernel source ...
Regards,
Peter
For a long time, I always used traditional "hand-made" kernels, so
whenever I needed it (compiling modules from external sources, changing
something in the kernel, ...), I naturally had the source tree
Hi,
For a long time, I always used traditional "hand-made" kernels, so
whenever I needed it (compiling modules from external sources, changing
something in the kernel, ...), I naturally had the source tree and
configuration matching the currently running kernel lying under
"
Fred Proctor wrote:
I still don't know how to build a kernel from source identitical to the
kernel binary provided with the Debian netinstall. If anyone knows how
to do that, please let me know.
--Fred
I'm still fairly new to linux but here's what I do. I dont use initrd's
now and prefer
thought was the kernel source, and expected to see
"-1-386" in the source tree top-level Makefile's symbol for
"EXTRAVERSION". However, it's blank.
I built this kernel, booted from it, and had different behavior from the
one that came in binary form with the netinsta
> to the kernel source, namely the device driver for my sound chip. I
> > installed what I thought was the kernel source, and expected to see
> > "-1-386" in the source tree top-level Makefile's symbol for
> > "EXTRAVERSION". However, it's blank.
> &g
lled what I thought was the kernel source, and expected to see
> "-1-386" in the source tree top-level Makefile's symbol for
> "EXTRAVERSION". However, it's blank.
>
> I built this kernel, booted from it, and had different behavior from the
> one that
86" in the source tree top-level Makefile's symbol for
"EXTRAVERSION". However, it's blank.
I built this kernel, booted from it, and had different behavior from the
one that came in binary form with the netinstall. The problem is with my
CD-DVD RW. With the default kern
.4.27 - Linux kernel source tree for building Debian kernel
| images
| linux-image-2.6.12-1-386 - Linux kernel 2.6.12 image on 386-class machines
| linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 - Linux kernel 2.6.12 image on
| PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4 machines
| linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp - Linux kernel 2.6.12 ima
for version 2.4.27 with Debian patcheskernel-tree-2.4.27 - Linux kernel source tree for building Debian kernel imageslinux-image-2.6.12-1-386 - Linux kernel 2.6.12 image on 386-class machines
linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 - Linux kernel 2.6.12 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4 machineslinux-image-2.6.12-1
for version 2.4.27 with Debian patcheskernel-tree-2.4.27 - Linux kernel source tree for building Debian kernel imageslinux-image-2.6.12-1-386 - Linux kernel 2.6.12 image on 386-class machines
linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 - Linux kernel 2.6.12 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/P4 machineslinux-image-2.6.12-1
cecil wrote:
> I need to know so the nvidia driver can install. Anyone know?
dpkg -l | grep "kernel-source"
This will show if it's installed. If it is, it's in /usr/src.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 15:14, welly hartanto wrote:
> --- cecil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need to know so the nvidia driver can install.
> > Anyone know?
>
> Are you sure you have installed kernel-tree of your
> current kernel ??? ( apt-get install
> kernel-tree-2.4.26 for 2.4.26 kernel )
>
--- cecil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to know so the nvidia driver can install.
> Anyone know?
Are you sure you have installed kernel-tree of your
current kernel ??? ( apt-get install
kernel-tree-2.4.26 for 2.4.26 kernel )
If so, then go to /var/cache/apt/archieves. You'll
probably find i
I need to know so the nvidia driver can install. Anyone know?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 05 March 2004 17:34, CW Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > On Friday 05 March 2004 01:39, CW Harris wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
>
>
>
> So you cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.22/, it contains "Makefile"
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2004 01:39, CW Harris wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > Maybe I'm misunderstanding. You do:
> > cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.22
> > make-kpkg modules-image
> >
> > and
On Friday 05 March 2004 10:20, David Baron wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2004 03:52,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm misunderstanding. You do:
> > cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.22
> > make-kpkg modules-image
> >
> > and you get the error:
> >
> > And yet /usr/src/linux-2.4.22 co
04-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
[...]
> > > > > Can someone kindly tell me what is meant by "the root of the
> > > > > source tree"?
> > >
> > > The top level directory of the kernel source. E.g.
> > > /usr/src/linux-2.4.22/ or /home/me/
On Friday 05 March 2004 03:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding. You do:
> cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.22
> make-kpkg modules-image
>
> and you get the error:
> And yet /usr/src/linux-2.4.22 contains your kernel source?
> Is this correct?
Before making, be sure th
ming up...
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to install thinkpad drivers for Debian. Instructions
> > > > say to unpack the thinkpad.tar.gz (no problem there) and then to
> > > > "cd to the root of the source tree for the kernel for which you
ers for Debian. Instructions
> > > say to unpack the thinkpad.tar.gz (no problem there) and then to
> > > "cd to the root of the source tree for the kernel for which you
> > > want to compile modules, e.g., /usr/src/linux. Run 'make-kpkg
> > > --rootcmd=fa
here) and then to "cd to
> > the root of the source tree for the kernel for which you want to
> > compile modules, e.g., /usr/src/linux. Run 'make-kpkg
> > --rootcmd=fakeroot modules-image'..." I innocently assumed the
> > root of the source tree would be
o problem there) and then to "cd to the
> > root of the source tree for the kernel for which you want to compile
> > modules, e.g., /usr/src/linux. Run 'make-kpkg --rootcmd=fakeroot
> > modules-image'..." I innocently assumed the root of the source tree
>
On 2004-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
> Another really dim question coming up...
>
> I'm trying to install thinkpad drivers for Debian. Instructions say to
> unpack the thinkpad.tar.gz (no problem there) and then to "cd to the
> root of the source tree for the kernel for
Another really dim question coming up...
I'm trying to install thinkpad drivers for Debian. Instructions say to
unpack the thinkpad.tar.gz (no problem there) and then to "cd to the
root of the source tree for the kernel for which you want to compile
modules, e.g., /usr/src/linux.
Hi. I am a blind Linux user attempting to install the source tree using
apt-cdrom. I got the packages installed fine. However, when I go to install the
source distribution, the package terminates with the following error: Handler
silently failed. I don't think this is an incompatibility
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 07:00:51PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> yo,
> before installing debian on some 35 clients here, i would like to
> mirror it locally so as to, you know, spare our backbone... the
> clients don't have cdrom's, so bootdisk/ftp is the installation medium
> of choice (anyway).
>
> q
MaD dUCK wrote:
>
> yo,
> before installing debian on some 35 clients here, i would like to
> mirror it locally so as to, you know, spare our backbone... the
> clients don't have cdrom's, so bootdisk/ftp is the installation medium
> of choice (anyway).
>
> question is: where's the rsync source i
yo,
before installing debian on some 35 clients here, i would like to
mirror it locally so as to, you know, spare our backbone... the
clients don't have cdrom's, so bootdisk/ftp is the installation medium
of choice (anyway).
question is: where's the rsync source i should plug in to to obtain
it al
Hi..
I'm trying to compile some programs which require shadow stuff. I have
shadow installed on my system and it's working but I don't have any of the
shadow header files (pwauth.h, libshadow.a etc) that I think, and others
say, that I should have.
Where do I find them? Do I need to get the sou
bandwidth savings for a modest tradeoff in mirror site storage
overhead. Source diffs are generally many times smaller than an entire package
especially when the changes involve small bug fixes between minor releases.
I'm unsure of others situations but in my environment the one-time cost
erted to the new source format, so
> > you will see some packages in the old format. (I am going to assume that
> > everyone knows how the old format worked)
> >
> > The new format consists of a source tree in package_xxx.orig.tar.gz that
> > unpacks into a source t
old format. (I am going to assume that
> everyone knows how the old format worked)
>
> The new format consists of a source tree in package_xxx.orig.tar.gz that
> unpacks into a source tree as nearly identical to that provided by the
> upstream provider as is possible; a diff.gz file c
Richard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hiya, i thought I saw someone mention that upgrades to existing
> packages were available via diffs to the source.
debian/doc/source-unpack.txt on any mirror.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROT
the one you referred to.
First, not all packages have been converted to the new source format, so
you will see some packages in the old format. (I am going to assume that
everyone knows how the old format worked)
The new format consists of a source tree in package_xxx.orig.tar.gz that
unpacks into a
Hiya, i thought I saw someone mention that upgrades to existing
packages were available via diffs to the source. Thus allowing the download of
just the diff rather than the entire .orig source ( assuming of course you have
the source to the original package online). Now I checked out the FAQ a
36 matches
Mail list logo
