On Saturday 04 March 2017 13:32:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote:
> > Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting
> > Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing
> > your message (and poss
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 07:13:22PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> In other words Back EMF?
>
> I know a chap who found about that the hard way when he tried to get
> something from nothing by charging a battery from a generator which he
> turned by having a fan con
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 07:13:22PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:16:36 John Hasler wrote:
>
> > Gene Heskett writes:
> > > Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction
> > > motor that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also
> > > be
I wrote:
> Induction motors can function as generators. You just need to connect
> them to an appropriate AC source and drive them above synchronous
> speed.
Gene writes:
> Yes, there is that exception, they need an excitation current, true,
> but in that case they make excellent brakes as they d
On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:16:36 John Hasler wrote:
> Gene Heskett writes:
> > Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction
> > motor that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also
> > be used as a motor...
>
> Induction motors can function as generators. You
On Sunday 05 March 2017 17:04:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> ΟΚ!
>
> Gene Heskett:
> > On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> >> Back to shanity, how does a microphone produce an electrical wave
> >> that can be translated into sound and how a wave may take the form
> >> of electrical curr
Gene Heskett writes:
> Very simple. With the glaring exception of the modern AC induction motor
> that in 99% of the stuff we buy, ANY other generator can also be used as
> a motor...
Induction motors can function as generators. You just need to connect
them to an appropriate AC source and driv
ΟΚ!
Gene Heskett:
> On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
>> Back to shanity, how does a microphone produce an electrical wave that
>> can be translated into sound and how a wave may take the form of
>> electrical current that produces sound through a speaker?
>
> Very simple. W
On Sunday 05 March 2017 15:18:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> Curt:
> > In case this wasn't clear: we're imagining clay being fashioned upon
> > a potter's wheel, and the striations that occur in the clay as it is
> > molded (which might possibly produce, according to Charpak's
> > conjecture, a sort of a
Curt:
>
> In case this wasn't clear: we're imagining clay being fashioned upon a
> potter's wheel, and the striations that occur in the clay as it is
> molded (which might possibly produce, according to Charpak's conjecture,
> a sort of analog audio recording of ambient sounds in the finished
> pr
On 2017-03-05, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-03-04, deloptes wrote:
>> GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>>
>>> PS Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are
>>> recorded by one's only true friend, the PC :)) :)))
>>
>> Paranormal activities :D
>>
>> I think it could be some voltage induced by phy
On 2017-03-04, deloptes wrote:
> GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
>> PS Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are
>> recorded by one's only true friend, the PC :)) :)))
>
> Paranormal activities :D
>
> I think it could be some voltage induced by physical contact.
>
> Think logically - i
GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> PS Suddenly, the noises in one's head that nobody else hears are
> recorded by one's only true friend, the PC :)) :)))
Paranormal activities :D
I think it could be some voltage induced by physical contact.
Think logically - if there is no mic or nothing plugged in to you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 11:25:00AM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
[...]
> Come to think of it, do newsgroups still exist?
To round-up this thread's recursive meta-hijacking:
oh, yes, they definitely exist. There are a couple of
providers out there keepin
On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote:
> Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting
> Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing
> your message (and possibly delete the quoted text, change the Subject
> line, et cetera).
>
testing installation,
>> downloaded FMIT (an instrument tuner that will pickup audio input/analog
>> and tell you all kinds of stuff about the wave that is fed).
>> Same exact behavior, hardware only lists two audio inputs and are both
>> unplugged. The lower the db thres
The Wanderer:
> On 2017-03-03 at 14:35, deloptes wrote:
>
>> The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>>> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an
>>> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message
>>> is unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know
>>> h
On 2017-03-03 at 14:35, deloptes wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an
>> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message
>> is unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know
>> how to do this. (Or be u
On 03/03/2017 08:53 AM, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
I plugged
then in to 3 different machines, downloaded FMIT and run it. Similar
results.
Is it in the repos?? Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidit
The Wanderer wrote:
> True, although someone who doesn't know that hitting Reply on an
> existing message threads the reply in under the existing message is
> unlikely to even know what message headers are, much less know how to do
> this. (Or be using a mail client which does permit that.)
But w
ut/analog
> and tell you all kinds of stuff about the wave that is fed).
> Same exact behavior, hardware only lists two audio inputs and are both
> unplugged. The lower the db threshold for sound recording the more
> apparent the sound becomes. Each knock on the box shows correspondi
Op 03-03-17 om 14:15 schreef Greg Wooledge:
Or manually remove the In-Reply-To: header, if your mail user agent
permits you to do this.
Don't forget the References: header.
Regards,
Frank
t the wave that is fed).
Same exact behavior, hardware only lists two audio inputs and are both
unplugged. The lower the db threshold for sound recording the more
apparent the sound becomes. Each knock on the box shows corresponding
amplification of that noise.
Ok, so I picked up 2-3 live debian
On 2017-03-03 at 08:15, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:13:37AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> In order to start a new thread, you have to create the E-mail from
>> scratch, e.g. by using a "New Mail" button or the equivalent.
>> Creating an E-mail by replying to an existing me
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:13:37AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> In order to start a new thread, you have to create the E-mail from
> scratch, e.g. by using a "New Mail" button or the equivalent. Creating
> an E-mail by replying to an existing message puts the new message into
> an existing thread,
On 2017-03-03 at 05:46, deloptes wrote:
> GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
>> It probably has nothing to do with the program itself but its
>> dependencies and some code feeding in wrong data as audio input.
>> But it is actual sound
>
> you have to provide information so that it may be reproduced. Please
GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> It probably has nothing to do with the program itself but its
> dependencies and some code feeding in wrong data as audio input. But it
> is actual sound
you have to provide information so that it may be reproduced. Please open
another thread. The information you provided so
the db threshold for sound recording the more
apparent the sound becomes. Each nock on the box shows corresponding
amplification of that noise.
Ok, so I picked up 2-3 live debian based USB sticks I have. I plugged
then in to 3 different machines, downloaded FMIT and run it. Similar
results. So
On 2014-09-29, lee wrote:
>
> Did you check in alsamixer that the recording is actually turned on?
> Just turning up the sliders doesn't suffice, you need to press space at
> the right slider (if you can figure out which is the right one) to
> toggle recording. Alsmixer will display something lik
Ста Деюс writes:
> Доброго времени суток, Doug.
>
>
> Спасибо за ответ, Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:32:38 -0400 вы писали:
>> > I use debian jessie and sound recording in audacity or skype does
>> > not work.
>
> [...]
>
> Same here. But before buying anythin
Доброго времени суток, Doug.
Спасибо за ответ, Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:32:38 -0400 вы писали:
> > I use debian jessie and sound recording in audacity or skype does
> > not work.
> >
> > Microphone as a device is operative. Audacity does not show
> > fluctuacion w
On 09/21/2014 07:14 AM, Paweł Ch. wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I use debian jessie and sound recording in audacity or skype does not work.
>
> Microphone as a device is operative. Audacity does not show fluctuacion when
> recording is enable. I use alsamixer command to adjust captur
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 at 13:14:55 +0200, Paweł Ch. wrote:
> I use debian jessie and sound recording in audacity or skype does not work.
>
> Microphone as a device is operative. Audacity does not show fluctuacion
> when recording is enable. I use alsamixer command to adjust capture slid
Hi list,
I use debian jessie and sound recording in audacity or skype does not work.
Microphone as a device is operative. Audacity does not show fluctuacion
when recording is enable. I use alsamixer command to adjust capture slider.
What I should do?
Best regards,
PCH
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 07:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Rusi Mody wrote:
> On Thursday, August 7, 2014 12:10:02 PM UTC+5:30, Long Wind wrote:
> > On 8/7/14, Rusi Mody wrote:
> > > If you are a 'average end user' why not use something like
> > > audacity? --
>
> > Someone has suggested aplay, I install it and it
2014-08-07 11:05 GMT+02:00 Curt :
> On 2014-08-06, Long Wind wrote:
> >
> > I might try sth. else
> > (I mean openbsd when I have time/energy in the future)
> >
>
> Right definitely change operating systems.
Also
http://www.oceanwayrecording.com/
could be of some help ;-)
On 2014-08-06, Long Wind wrote:
>
> I might try sth. else
> (I mean openbsd when I have time/energy in the future)
>
Right definitely change operating systems.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
On 8/7/14, Rusi Mody wrote:
>
> If you are a 'average end user' why not use something like audacity?
>
>
> --
Someone has suggested aplay, I install it and it doesn't help
Now you suggest audacity, I'm really tired
Thanks anyway!
I'm signing off the list
Pls reply to longwind2...@gmail.com
--
On Thursday, August 7, 2014 3:40:02 AM UTC+5:30, Long Wind wrote:
> I run arecord -L, the output is for programmers, not for an average
> end user, I think
> I have no success on SUSE either, Linux is hard to use sometime
> below is output by arecord -L on SUSE:
If you are a 'average end user' w
On 8/7/14, Curt wrote:
>>
>
> http://alsa.opensrc.org/Record_from_mic
>
> Something like the above, except you'll be recording from "line" instead
> "mic".
>
> Of course, we can't see what you're seeing when you open alsamixer and
> press F4 (depends on the card).
>
> On my machine, there's toggli
I can record a/v on an old SUSE distro
according to producer, some devices look like these:
RealProducer(R) Plus 11.1 Build number: 11.1.0.2648
VIDEO
Device 00: BT848A video ( *** UNKNOWN/GENE /dev/video0
Port 00: Television
Port 01: Composite1
Port 02: S-Video
Port 03: Composite
On 2014-08-06, Long Wind wrote:
>
> alsamixer seems difficult to use
> I press F4 and increase volume for capture
> I still have no sucess with recording
> I don't know how to "define a capture device" with alsamixer
> Thanks anyway!
>
http://alsa.opensrc.org/Record_from_mic
Something like the
On 8/6/14, B wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 19:50:53 +0800
> Long Wind wrote:
>
>> Thank you! I have installed alsa-utils, but still can't identify it
>> with your command
>
> Also install alsamixer(gui); may computers have 2 MIC inputs
> (or even 2 sound cards) and the first one is selected by
On 8/6/14, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-08-06, Long Wind wrote:
>> Thank you! I have installed alsa-utils, but still can't identify it
>> with your command
>> below is output by arecord -L
>>
>
> I only obtain a list of output devices with that command.
>
> To define a capture device I use alsamixer (F4
On 8/6/14, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> 2014-08-06 13:50 GMT+02:00 Long Wind :
>
>
>
> try with
> $ arecord
>
> filename.wav
>
> should simply work
>
> /r
>
It doesn't work as you have hoped
I'm afraid the first two lines of arecord -L indicate sth. wrong:
null
Discard all samples (playba
2014-08-06 18:29 GMT+02:00 Curt :
> On 2014-08-06, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> >
> > d'oh!
> > "l" not "L"
> >
>
> Yes, but I see nothing helpful in that output either for setting the
> capture device for recording (mic, line-in, etc.):
>
> curty@einstein:~$ arecord -l
> List of CAPTURE Hardwa
On 2014-08-06, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
>
> d'oh!
> "l" not "L"
>
Yes, but I see nothing helpful in that output either for setting the
capture device for recording (mic, line-in, etc.):
curty@einstein:~$ arecord -l
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 1: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: ALC6
2014-08-06 15:33 GMT+02:00 Curt :
> On 2014-08-06, Long Wind wrote:
> > Thank you! I have installed alsa-utils, but still can't identify it
> > with your command
> > below is output by arecord -L
> >
>
> I only obtain a list of output devices with that command.
>
> To define a capture device I us
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 19:50:53 +0800
Long Wind wrote:
> Thank you! I have installed alsa-utils, but still can't identify it
> with your command
Also install alsamixer(gui); may computers have 2 MIC inputs
(or even 2 sound cards) and the first one is selected by
default when the 2nd one is the right
On 2014-08-06, Long Wind wrote:
> Thank you! I have installed alsa-utils, but still can't identify it
> with your command
> below is output by arecord -L
>
I only obtain a list of output devices with that command.
To define a capture device I use alsamixer (F4).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2014-08-06 13:50 GMT+02:00 Long Wind :
> On 8/6/14, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> > 2014-08-05 22:48 GMT+02:00 Long Wind :
> >
>
> >
> > I would use arecord/aplay
> >
> > $ arecord -L # lists pcm devices by name, so quickly find your line-in
> >
> > then
> > $ arecord -D device_name
> > -
> > t w
On 8/6/14, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> 2014-08-05 22:48 GMT+02:00 Long Wind :
>
>
> I would use arecord/aplay
>
> $ arecord -L # lists pcm devices by name, so quickly find your line-in
>
> then
> $ arecord -D device_name
> -
> t wav -f cd
> filename.wav
>
Thank you! I have installed alsa-
2014-08-05 22:48 GMT+02:00 Long Wind :
> I want to record sound from line-in of sound card,
> I enter sth. like:
>
> brec -d /dev/dsp -b 8 -t 15 -w t2.wav
>
> after that l use bplay to play t2.wav, I can't hear sound
>
> I'm afraid I need to specify line-in, in addition to /dev/dsp, but how to
>
I want to record sound from line-in of sound card,
I enter sth. like:
brec -d /dev/dsp -b 8 -t 15 -w t2.wav
after that l use bplay to play t2.wav, I can't hear sound
I'm afraid I need to specify line-in, in addition to /dev/dsp, but how to do it?
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-u
On Thursday 20 January 2011 19:30:04 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I didn't even try to search it by package name, instead I used:
>
> apt-cache search record gnome
>
> which narrows it down to 13 packages, of which gnome-media is pretty
> easy to spot ;)
I obviously had my blinkers on. :-( I made
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:25:37AM +, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2011 01:50:31 Joel Roth wrote:
> > Depending on your needs, and if the GUI waveform display isn't so important
> > you may like to experiment with Nama. (Nama does have a simple
> > Tk UI for controlling transport, effect
On Jo, 20 ian 11, 09:23:26, Lisi wrote:
>
> Thanks, Andrei - and yes, you are right. Before ever I asked for help I had
> been looking fruitlessly for GNOME Sound Recorder, which I have managed to
> use before. But I didn't find it. The information taht it now hides in
> gnome-media was what
On Thursday 20 January 2011 08:51:57 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Ma, 18 ian 11, 09:25:37, Lisi wrote:
> > Thanks very much, Joel. I'll take a look. But you illustrate my main
> > problem very well. In this context, what are transport and special
> > effects?? Well, I could possibly guess what sp
On Ma, 18 ian 11, 09:25:37, Lisi wrote:
>
> Thanks very much, Joel. I'll take a look. But you illustrate my main
> problem
> very well. In this context, what are transport and special effects?? Well,
> I could possibly guess what special effects are, but "transport"???
>
> I simply don't k
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 01:50:31 Joel Roth wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:27:11PM +, Lisi wrote:
> > On Monday 17 January 2011 22:30:11 Celejar wrote:
> > > > I have also had another look at Audacity, as suggested. But there is
> > > > just too much there that I simply don't understand
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:27:11PM +, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 17 January 2011 22:30:11 Celejar wrote:
> > > I have also had another look at Audacity, as suggested. But there is
> > > just too much there that I simply don't understand. However, I shall
> > > return to it if I get nowhere with
On Monday 17 January 2011 22:30:11 Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:04:54 +
>
> Lisi wrote:
[snip]
> > I had in fact been looking for the gnome-sound-recorder app, but had
> > failed to find any mention of it. So I shall start by trying
> > gnome-media. Thanks Chamaleón.
> >
> > I have
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:04:54 +
Lisi wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 January 2011 19:22:29 Camaleón wrote:
> > Another option could be installing the "gnome-media" metapackage that has
> > the gnome-sound-recorder app, but I personally, prefer not to mix desktop
> > environments libraries/applications
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Lisi wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I have also had another look at Audacity, as suggested. But there is just
> too
> much there that I simply don't understand. However, I shall return to it
> if
> I get nowhere with gnome-media.
>
I will say from personal experience tha
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 19:22:29 Camaleón wrote:
> Another option could be installing the "gnome-media" metapackage that has
> the gnome-sound-recorder app, but I personally, prefer not to mix desktop
> environments libraries/applications (call me "old-fashioned", but I hate
> dealing with sil
; 1) Be managed by someone who knows a little bit about Linux, less about
> Debian
> and absolutely zilch about sound recording and balancing etc.
>
> 2) Ideally, usable by someone who knows even less about computers and sound
> recording, but can use this package without too active
* Petrus Validus [110105 22:51]:
>
> > The Lexicon Alpha and Omega use USB 1.0 and thus work with Linux Etch,
> > Lenny, and Squeeze; a two- or three-line configuration file may be
> > needed to make the Lexicon the default sound device. With Ubuntu
> > 10.10, both are fully plug-and-play.
>
>
> The Lexicon Alpha and Omega use USB 1.0 and thus work with Linux Etch,
> Lenny, and Squeeze; a two- or three-line configuration file may be
> needed to make the Lexicon the default sound device. With Ubuntu
> 10.10, both are fully plug-and-play.
This is exciting to hear that such interfaces ha
knows a little bit about Linux, less about
> Debian
> and absolutely zilch about sound recording and balancing etc.
>
> 2) Ideally, usable by someone who knows even less about computers and sound
> recording, but can use this package without too active a helping hand.
>
>
1) Be managed by someone who knows a little bit about Linux, less about
>> Debian and absolutely zilch about sound recording and balancing etc.
Not sure if matching this criteria, but the very basic I've
successfully used like years ago to record from some old LPs is plain
ar
ut
> Debian and absolutely zilch about sound recording and balancing etc.
>
> 2) Ideally, usable by someone who knows even less about computers and
> sound recording, but can use this package without too active a helping
> hand.
(...)
"Krecord" could be an option but is not in th
Krec, Audacity
etc.
are non-starters because they assume that you would know how to use at
least
a simple mixer.
Forgot to say...you don't have to know that.
There is only one slider for input (mic.) volume and that's enough.
Look at the pic.: www.dobosevic.com/nix/audacity.png
When I recordin
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 15:44 +, Lisi wrote:
> I am after something from never-never land, but I live in hopes.
>
> I need a sound recorder, and would prefer that it be in Debian Lenny,
> but a dual-boot would be possible. It must fulfil the following
> criteria:
Interesting requirements to s
about Linux, less about Debian
and absolutely zilch about sound recording and balancing etc.
2) Ideally, usable by someone who knows even less about computers and sound
recording, but can use this package without too active a helping hand.
Last time my husband needed to record a book, I Installed
absolutely zilch about sound recording and balancing etc.
2) Ideally, usable by someone who knows even less about computers and sound
recording, but can use this package without too active a helping hand.
Last time my husband needed to record a book, I Installed Jaunty on a computer
that I had to
On Sunday 07 December 2008 17:28, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2008 12:39 pm, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon,01.Dec.08, 05:19:05, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> > > Now I need to compile some kernel modules for VirtualBox so I need the
> > > kernel source. Of course, it is not listed in
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 11:28:33 -0500, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2008 12:39 pm, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon,01.Dec.08, 05:19:05, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> > > Now I need to compile some kernel modules for VirtualBox so I need the
> > > kernel source. Of course, it is not list
* Mark Neidorff [081207 17:30 +0100]
[...]
> Assuming that it is the wrong version of ALSA, where can I find
> detailed instructions for downloading and compiling the newer ALSA
> kernel(?)/modules(?) so that I can use sound and VirtualBox at the
> same time?
apt-get install alsa-source
read /usr
On Monday 01 December 2008 12:39 pm, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,01.Dec.08, 05:19:05, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> > Now I need to compile some kernel modules for VirtualBox so I need the
> > kernel source. Of course, it is not listed in synaptic, so now I'm in
> > the position of rebooting between c
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 05:26:49PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> lee writes:
> > But how do know that there is voltage when you cannot measure it or
> > otherwise make evident that there is? As far as I understand it, you
> > cannot do that without current flowing. You can do it for water pressure
>
On Mon,01.Dec.08, 19:19:49, Nigel Henry wrote:
> I'm not complaining, as I do have the Musix kernel installed, which has the
> sounds working (alsa driver 1.0.16), but it is a bit bizarre that Dapper has
> sound using the alsa driver 1.0.15, but etchnhalf, using the same alsa
> driver, does no
On Monday 01 December 2008 18:39, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,01.Dec.08, 05:19:05, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> > Now I need to compile some kernel modules for VirtualBox so I need the
> > kernel source. Of course, it is not listed in synaptic, so now I'm in
> > the position of rebooting between conf
On Mon,01.Dec.08, 05:19:05, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> Now I need to compile some kernel modules for VirtualBox so I need the kernel
> source. Of course, it is not listed in synaptic, so now I'm in the position
> of rebooting between configurations that use sound and one where I can use
> Virtual
On Monday 01 December 2008 11:19, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> On Saturday 29 November 2008 07:20 pm, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 14:11, Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi Kelly.
> > >
> > > I did see the Etchnhalf 2.6.24 kernel when looking at synaptic.
On Saturday 29 November 2008 07:20 pm, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 14:11, Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Kelly.
> >
> > I did see the Etchnhalf 2.6.24 kernel when looking at synaptic. I only
> > suggested the musix one, as I have it installed, and know it
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 14:11, Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kelly.
>
> I did see the Etchnhalf 2.6.24 kernel when looking at synaptic. I only
> suggested the musix one, as I have it installed, and know it uses alsa driver
> 1.0.16. I'm on dialup, and didn't want to download the et
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 08:27:02AM -0500, Napoleon wrote:
> lee wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 08:32:24PM -0500, Napoleon wrote:
>>> Which is why is is important to correct misinformation on the list.
>>
>> You got all wrong: People will start thinking you're a twat when you
>> try to do that ..
e you need to know about my system to help me get
> >> > sound working?
> >> >
> >> > PLEASE HELP me get sound working.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Mark
>
>
>
> >> Their are 2 options. Upg
. Upgrade the alsa driver, which is currently 1.0.18a,
>> or install a later kernel, which has a later alsa driver.
>>
>> I chose on this machine to install a later kernel, which has alsa driver
>> 1.0.16, and my sound on Etch works ok with this.
>>
>> If you want go
lee wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 08:32:24PM -0500, Napoleon wrote:
Which is why is is important to correct misinformation on the list.
You got all wrong: People will start thinking you're a twat when you
try to do that ...
No, I'm not the one being called a twat. That only happens when
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 08:32:24PM -0500, Napoleon wrote:
> Which is why is is important to correct misinformation on the list.
You got all wrong: People will start thinking you're a twat when you
try to do that ...
--
"Don't let them, daddy. Don't let the stars run down."
http://adin.dyndns.or
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:10:17PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
> >> BTW, I agree a bit with an earlier poster that you a being a bit of a
> >> twat. This mailing list isn't really appropriate for epistemological
> >> discussions.
> >
> > Me, three.
>
> One more.
Hm, it's interesting to see how u
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:01:01AM -0600, lee wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 09:38:40AM -0500, Mark Neidorff wrote:
also want to be able to record sound from the stereo headphones jack of my
radio and the stereo audio out from my XM radio.
The headphone connector is for h
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:36:58PM -0500, Napoleon wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> On Friday 2008 November 28 15:28, lee wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:13:21PM -0500, Andrew Reid wrote:
On Friday 28 November 2008 14:10, lee wrote:
> Is it even possible to measure a mere po
On Friday 28 November 2008 16:28, lee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:13:21PM -0500, Andrew Reid wrote:
> > On Friday 28 November 2008 14:10, lee wrote:
> > > Is it even possible to measure a mere potential?
> >
> > You mean, in principle? Of course.
> >
> > Put your two wires of unknown p
On Friday 2008 November 28 17:36, Napoleon wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > On Friday 2008 November 28 15:28, lee wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:13:21PM -0500, Andrew Reid wrote:
> >>> On Friday 28 November 2008 14:10, lee wrote:
> Is it even possible to measure a mere potent
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Friday 2008 November 28 15:28, lee wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:13:21PM -0500, Andrew Reid wrote:
On Friday 28 November 2008 14:10, lee wrote:
Is it even possible to measure a mere potential?
You mean, in principle? Of course.
It takes energy to defec
lee wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:48:59PM -0500, Napoleon wrote:
lee wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 02:43:28PM -0500, Napoleon wrote:
lee wrote:
Is it even possible to measure a mere potential?
Of course. That's what voltage is.
Hm, true, voltage is impossible without current flowing b
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:01:01AM -0600, lee wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 09:38:40AM -0500, Mark Neidorff wrote:
>
> > also want to be able to record sound from the stereo headphones jack of my
> > radio and the stereo audio out from my XM radio.
>
> The headphone connector is for headphone
lee writes:
> But how do know that there is voltage when you cannot measure it or
> otherwise make evident that there is? As far as I understand it, you
> cannot do that without current flowing. You can do it for water pressure
> without water flowing, but I don't see how you could do it for voltag
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
