On 2012-06-16, lina wrote:
>
> I have purged the slurm based on the suggestions and my failure
> attempt to configure it.
>
> Thanks for all and have a nice weekend,
Sorry about that. I didn't realize you were clustered because as I
mentioned those other threads where you mention your clustered s
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Curt wrote:
> On 2012-06-15, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
>
>
>>> >> It's for linux clusters, so I would say unless you're running or are
>
>>> >> part of a linux cluster, which doesn't seem to
On 2012-06-15, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> >> It's for linux clusters, so I would say unless you're running or are
>> >> part of a linux cluster, which doesn't seem to be the case, you
>> > ***
>> > Ac
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:54:17PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2012-06-15, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >>
> >> It's for linux clusters, so I would say unless you're running or are
> >> part of a linux cluster, which doesn't seem to be the case, you
> >> shouldn't be running it. I wonder why it's instal
On 2012-06-15, Chris Bannister wrote:
>>
>> It's for linux clusters, so I would say unless you're running or are
>> part of a linux cluster, which doesn't seem to be the case, you
>> shouldn't be running it. I wonder why it's installed on your machine
>> in the first place.
>
> According to prev
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:28:09PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2012-06-11, lina wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am a bit confused. Today during upgrade,
> >
> > it showed me
> >
> > Not starting slurm-llnl
> > slurm.conf was not found in /etc/slurm-llnl
> > Please follow the instructions in /usr/share/doc/sl
On 2012-06-14, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Thank you. I don't think the OP fits into any of the use cases for
>> this software.
>
> Correct. Nevertheless, I wanted to shake a bit the cluster idea of your post.
>
You shook it. That's why I said thank you (for the shake).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi !
On 14/06/12 19:07, Curt wrote:
On 2012-06-14, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
SLURM can also be run on a multi-core box:
it makes sense to use SLURM on a Mac Pro (24 cores).
It can also be installed on a box for developing and testing jobs.
Thank you. I don't think the OP fits into any of the u
On 2012-06-14, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
> SLURM can also be run on a multi-core box:
> it makes sense to use SLURM on a Mac Pro (24 cores).
> It can also be installed on a box for developing and testing jobs.
>
Thank you. I don't think the OP fits into any of the use cases for
this software.
--
Hello:
On 14/06/12 18:28, Curt wrote:
On 2012-06-11, lina wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit confused. Today during upgrade,
it showed me
Not starting slurm-llnl
slurm.conf was not found in /etc/slurm-llnl
Please follow the instructions in /usr/share/doc/slurm-llnl/README.Debian.gz
Shall I configure th
On 2012-06-11, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a bit confused. Today during upgrade,
>
> it showed me
>
> Not starting slurm-llnl
> slurm.conf was not found in /etc/slurm-llnl
> Please follow the instructions in /usr/share/doc/slurm-llnl/README.Debian.gz
>
> Shall I configure the slurm on my personal l
Hi,
I am a bit confused. Today during upgrade,
it showed me
Not starting slurm-llnl
slurm.conf was not found in /etc/slurm-llnl
Please follow the instructions in /usr/share/doc/slurm-llnl/README.Debian.gz
Shall I configure the slurm on my personal laptop,
I don't know much, so feel free to tel
12 matches
Mail list logo
