Re: sockets without processes

2001-08-30 Thread dman
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:28:27PM -0700, Bob Galloway wrote: | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:25:27AM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote: | > tcp 0 0 192.168.14.6:32884 mailhost:smtp TIME_WAIT - | > tcp 0 0 192.168.14.6:32885 mailhost:smtp TIME_WAIT - |

[Fwd: Re: sockets without processes]

2001-08-30 Thread greg
Original Message Subject: Re: sockets without processes Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:28:27 -0700 From: Bob Galloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Martin F Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,

Re: sockets without processes

2001-08-30 Thread Bob Galloway
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:25:27AM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote: > tcp 0 0 192.168.14.6:32884 mailhost:smtp TIME_WAIT - > tcp 0 0 192.168.14.6:32885 mailhost:smtp TIME_WAIT - > tell me nothing about the process owning them. > i am merely wondering

sockets without processes

2001-08-30 Thread Martin F Krafft
hi, i am aware that OWNER matching on iptables is still experimental, but i have a related question, which excited my interest... my 'postfix' user is allowed to send packets to port 25/tcp of any system. this seems to work just fine as mails are delivered, but for each message, my iptables also l