David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-19 14:35, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > So I could drop down to a 2-port NIC, using 3 total and not
> > having any spares, but I already have this setup, and it's been
> > running nicely since 2014. I spent about $250 on it, including
> > some parts I had lying around
On 2021-01-19 14:35, Dan Ritter wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
card in it, as well as the 1 gig port on the motherboard. Each
is completely independent, so I have:
- one connection to the p
David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
> > card in it, as well as the 1 gig port on the motherboard. Each
> > is completely independent, so I have:
> >
> > - one connection to the public Internet
>
On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig et
David Christensen wrote:
> One feature of link aggregation is increased throughput -- two physical
> connections can work together as one logical connection that is twice as
> fast.
With the caveat that this does not increase the throughput of a single
flow.
> But the killer feature is redun
On 2021-01-19 04:47, mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
Yes, and more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_aggregation
One feature
mick crane wrote:
> What is the purpose of remote power switch ?
It can turn on and off a set of wall outlets, to which other
computers are attached. In other words, if the firewall is
running, I can power-cycle several other machines.
-dsr-
> What is the purpose of remote power switch ?
Probably to turn on the popcorn machine when you're not at home.
Stefan
On 2021-01-19 15:06, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Mick,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
There is no
Hi Mick,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
There is no strong connection between the concept
On 2021-01-19 14:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig et
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 12:47 +, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4
> connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
>
> mick
>
Yes,
but depending on your network topology
mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
card in it, as well as the
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
You can even put one connection (aka "port") on se
Hi.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
They call them "ports" usually. Such things exist for a long time in a
server world, but are infrequent in consumer one.
> Can you happily make each on
On 1/19/21 2:47 PM, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
>
I don't know what the purpose is one network card to have multiple
co
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
B.R. wrote:
> Nginx spawns its worker processes with the user 'nginx' who belongs
> to the 'www-data' group. But when Nginx tried to bind on the PHP-FPM
> socket, it encountered a 'permission denied' error.
Is the primary group for the nginx user "www-data" or something
else? Sometimes when a pro
Hi,
I recently encountered some permissions trouble with a UNIX domain socket.
I was trying to bind Nginx on PHP-FPM that way to get rid of the TCP socket
usually used.
PHP-FPM spawned its socket with its user/group set up in its configuration
file. I had:
- User: www-data
- Group: www-data
- Mod
Hello,
I am facing a strange problem on Debian Lenny systems using the Xen
Debian kernel.
I run Puppet and the agent seems to leave a lot of sockets in CLOSE_WAIT
state.
Where the funny thing begins is that after some time I can see that same
kind of CLOSE_WAIT sockets owned by other processes
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 07:50 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> michael:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> >> michael:
> >>>
> >>> httpd (no pid file) not running
> >>> apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified
> >>> domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for
michael:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>> michael:
>>>
>>> httpd (no pid file) not running
>>> apache2: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified
>>> domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
>>> (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind t
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> michael:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
> > Forcing reload of web server (apache2)...apache2: Could not reliably
> > determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for
> > ServerName
>
>
michael:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
> Forcing reload of web server (apache2)...apache2: Could not reliably
> determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for
> ServerName
You may want to set ServerName in your apache configuration to get rid
o
ualified
domain name, using 127.0.0.1 for ServerName
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
127.0.0.1:80
no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open logs
failed!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
All helpful pointers to solving this are most welcome!
Thanks, Michael
Hi,
fuser seems to be misbehaving for me. It does not return the PID for
UNIX sockets. I wrote the following little script to illustrate my
problem:
--
#!/usr/bin/perl -Tw
use strict;
use Socket;
use Carp;
my $server;
socket($server,PF_UNIX,SOCK_STREAM,0
> > One thing I would like to know how to do, but I don't think it's
> > possible, is to find out what process is on the other end of a pipe.
> > If that were possible, I could write a graphical system display tool,
> > that shows you all your processes and how they're connected together.
> >
> >
Sam Watkins wrote:
On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 15:19 +0700, David Garamond wrote:
Anyone knows of a program (command-line or GUI) to display process
information, e.g. which TCP/UDP/Unix sockets are used by the process
and what are their ports/hosts/etc.
Probably the best you're going to get i
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 11:28:35PM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 15:19 +0700, David Garamond wrote:
> > Anyone knows of a program (command-line or GUI) to display process
> > information, e.g. which TCP/UDP/Unix sockets are used by the process
> > and what
Ron Johnson wrote:
Anyone knows of a program (command-line or GUI) to display process
information, e.g. which TCP/UDP/Unix sockets are used by the process and
what are their ports/hosts/etc. I used to write a little script that
parses /proc/net/{tcp,udp,unix} but needs more info/convenience
On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 15:19 +0700, David Garamond wrote:
> Anyone knows of a program (command-line or GUI) to display process
> information, e.g. which TCP/UDP/Unix sockets are used by the process
> and what are their ports/hosts/etc.
Probably the best you're going to get is the out
On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 15:19 +0700, David Garamond wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Anyone knows of a program (command-line or GUI) to display process
> information, e.g. which TCP/UDP/Unix sockets are used by the process and
> what are their ports/hosts/etc. I used to write a little script
Dear all,
Anyone knows of a program (command-line or GUI) to display process
information, e.g. which TCP/UDP/Unix sockets are used by the process and
what are their ports/hosts/etc. I used to write a little script that
parses /proc/net/{tcp,udp,unix} but needs more info/convenience, e.g
Hello,
I found what it was...in my kernel was "UNIX DOMAIN SOCKETS" not
configured in my kernel...
I choose to compile it in the kernel and everything works fine...
Cheers,
Phil.
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag
pen failed for local/squidie:0
_XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for local
Fatal server error:
Cannot establish any listening sockets - Make sure an X server isn't
already running
When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
the full server output, not just the last messages
>
> --
> From: Sreelal Chandrasenan
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:25:22 AM
> To: Debian User (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: postgresql and domain sockets
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
>
>
-Original Message-
From: Monique Y. H
-Original Message-
From: Monique Y. Herman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: postgresql and domain sockets
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 at 10:23 GMT, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) penned:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:01:26 -0700, Moni
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 at 10:23 GMT, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) penned:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:01:26 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>> What have I missed?
>>
>> ( postgresql 7.3.4-9 on unstable )
>
> postgresql-client 7.3.4-9 as well?
Yes, sir!
>> I just installed this package. When I try to do,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:01:26 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> What have I missed?
>
> ( postgresql 7.3.4-9 on unstable )
postgresql-client 7.3.4-9 as well?
> I just installed this package. When I try to do, well, anything, it
> says:
>
> psql: could not connect to server: No such file or
What have I missed?
( postgresql 7.3.4-9 on unstable )
I just installed this package. When I try to do, well, anything, it
says:
psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
Is the server running locally and accepting
connections on Unix domain socket "/var/run/p
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:58:39AM +0530, Anand Raman wrote:
| Shouldnt the socket connections be closed the moment rsh completes
| the command execution
No.
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# netstat
| Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
| Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Addre
Hi guys
I am using rsh to execute a command on a remote machine. The command execution happens
fine and the method returns perfectly.
However when I use netstat to view the socket connections on the remote machine I see
multiple connections opened from the source machine.
Why does this happen
I am working on developing some bridge software that takes Ethernet frames
from a PC, filters them, then changes them to UDP packets then sends them to
a server. This process needs to be reversed when UDP packets are returned
from the server destined for that PC.
I need to use:
1) Debian Li
wants to terminate the connection. The other side sends back an ACK
to acknowledge recieving the FIN. Then the other side sends a FIN
(when it is ready) to indicate that it too is done and wants to close
the connection. Then the sockets enter a wait period where they wait
for any remaining packets
Original Message
Subject: Re: sockets without processes
Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:28:27 -0700
From: Bob Galloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin F Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:25:27AM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote:
> tcp 0 0 192.168.14.6:32884 mailhost:smtp TIME_WAIT -
> tcp 0 0 192.168.14.6:32885 mailhost:smtp TIME_WAIT -
> tell me nothing about the process owning them.
> i am merely wondering
hi,
i am aware that OWNER matching on iptables is still experimental, but
i have a related question, which excited my interest...
my 'postfix' user is allowed to send packets to port 25/tcp of any
system. this seems to work just fine as mails are delivered, but for
each message, my iptables also l
Thank you, Dimitri.
I am now a little bit less clueless :)
Cheers,
Mike Pfleger
There's seventy brilliant people on earth.
Where are they hiding?
"Yashar" -Cabaret Voltaire (off of "2x45")
#x27;ve understood
> this correctly? I never got a reply to my response.
>
> >> With the Berkley Sockets TCPIP (ie Linux, BSD, Solaris, ...) you can
> >> build a complete IP packet and send it down to the network card
> >> (ethernet) for transmission. You nee
>> With the Berkley Sockets TCPIP (ie Linux, BSD, Solaris, ...) you can
>> build a complete IP packet and send it down to the network card
>> (ethernet) for transmission. You need to be root, but you can do it.
>>
>> Windows TCPIP currently doesn't allow t
Hi Jim,
sorry for not answering immediately, but the problem is that I can't see
any problem (see below for explanations)
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Jim McCloskey wrote:
[...]
> I just installed Xine (version 4.3) from testing. I also installed
> xine-dvd-css (from an unofficial debian site). I'm ru
MP (Internet Group
Managment Protocol, which is used for Multicast I think).
> priviledges for udp sockets? (simalar to why you cant run nmap udp scans
> unless you're root).
No, that is also because of Raw sockets in general. There is no reason why
you can't use UDP sockets... jus
hi,
> > i am a non-root user on a debian 2.2 system and i cant write a c program
to
> > open sockets.
> >
> > i am a non-root user on a solaris system and i am able to write c
programs
> > that open sockets.
> >
> > is there a switch/setting somewher
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Marc-Adrian Napoli wrote:
> i am a non-root user on a debian 2.2 system and i cant write a c program to
> open sockets.
>
> i am a non-root user on a solaris system and i am able to write c programs
> that open sockets.
>
> is there a switch/setting
hi,
i am a non-root user on a debian 2.2 system and i cant write a c program to
open sockets.
i am a non-root user on a solaris system and i am able to write c programs
that open sockets.
is there a switch/setting somewhere on a debian system to change this? or is
root the only user allowed to
starting the process as user
nobody
brendo >"xfs-xtt -user nobody" I can a fatal error to the effect it can't
establish
brendo >any listening sockets. When I just run it as root without the -user
param.
brendo >it loads fine.
brendo >
brendo >So the question How
I'm trying to setup xfs-xtt, and when starting the process as user nobody
"xfs-xtt -user nobody" I can a fatal error to the effect it can't establish
any listening sockets. When I just run it as root without the -user param.
it loads fine.
So the question How can it run a
> There are some Sockets package for C++ development?
have a look at APE (A portable Environment). The deb packages in
potato are libape1 and libape1-dev.
--
saisanthosh
On 2000-06-08 08:19:56, Camilo Alejandro Arboleda wrote:
> Hi:
>
> There are some Sockets package for C++ development?
> I didn't found anything in Slink.
ace might be of interest to you, don't know if it was
included in slink.
/Allan
--
Allan Wind e
Hi:
There are some Sockets package for C++ development?
I didn't found anything in Slink.
Thanks
Camilo Alejandro.
--
* De simio la conoci y he visto hombres que la añoran.
* En lo que a mi se refiere, ni entonces ni ahora
* perdi mi libertad.
Informe para una academia. Franz Kafka
is supported
Graham> in the kernel I have?), failing, then gets into a loop trying
Graham> to open sockets, eventually failing by hitting the maximum
Graham> open file limit?
I have seen this before, and it was not a GNOME package, but rather
iplogger (or a package for a similar purpose) t
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, Graham Williams wrote:
>All works great, of course, except Gnome seems to be trying to open
>some audio device (I haven't compiled any kernels and I don't think my
>Sound Blaster Pro compatible card is supported in the kernel I have?),
If it is a 100% compatible clone, it wil
ling, then gets into a loop trying to open sockets, eventually
failing by hitting the maximum open file limit?
This tends to happen after I've already got one or two gnome
applications already running (like two gnome-terminals---the third one
fails as described above).
Any ideas?
Here's
Howdy,
Got a bit of a problem, not real sure how to solve it.
Debian box used for mail. People pop their mail (via Outlook). Theres about 50
clients that do this every 5 or so minutes. Every now and then people will
complain that they can't get their mail [that in fact, they cannot be logged
Hi!
Is it normal to have 2 '1' raw sockets and one '6' raw socket?
If so, why is it caused by? :-?
TIA!
$ netstat -a
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp
When Jens B. Jorgensen replied to Stephen Carpenter thusly, I replied:
>
> Shut down samba on your linux box before doing this. It is already bound to
> those
> ports. Also yes, you must run nc as root if you want to bind to those ports.
And you might like to have a look at /etc/services and /et
Ok, well make sure you stopped samba *and* any running nmbd or smbd processes.
Then do a
'netstat -at' and look for bindings to the addresses. Then you should be able
to run (as
root). Note that land can probably do it because it sets the proper socket
option for
reusing ports. I wouldn't think
Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
> Shut down samba on your linux box before doing this. It is already bound to
> those
> ports. Also yes, you must run nc as root if you want to bind to those ports.
well...ok...I stopped samba...then I took it out of inetd.conf (commented out)
then I tried again (after r
Shut down samba on your linux box before doing this. It is already bound to
those
ports. Also yes, you must run nc as root if you want to bind to those ports.
Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> Ok...
> I have had a problem under debian linux..and I just can't figure out WHY
> I am
> a while back the "la
Ok...
I have had a problem under debian linux..and I just can't figure out WHY
I am
a while back the "land" attack was posted on bugtraq...and just for
"Shits and giggles" I decided to see if I could make a version of it
using a shell script and the "netcat" program.
I did and it worked fine under
70 matches
Mail list logo
