Re: Alternative to snapshot.debian.net

2010-07-17 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 02:37:21PM +, T o n g wrote: > Hi, > > Since the snapshot.debian.net has stopped updating, is there any other > debian snapshot servers that I can use? http://snapshot.debian.org/ Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, wor

Alternative to snapshot.debian.net

2010-07-17 Thread T o n g
Hi, Since the snapshot.debian.net has stopped updating, is there any other debian snapshot servers that I can use? Thanks -- Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply) http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/ http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

2009-09-15 Thread Javier Barroso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Tue,15.Sep.09, 08:46:17, Javier Barroso wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Memnon Anon > >> > With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, >> > I hope this will change ;). >> > Nobody mentioned snapshot explicitely, yet, if I

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

2009-09-15 Thread Memnon Anon
Andrei Popescu writes: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Memnon Anon >> > With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, >> > I hope this will change ;). [...] > Memnon probably meant > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/09/msg00038.html > and the following thread. Right: ,---[ -htt

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

2009-09-15 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue,15.Sep.09, 08:46:17, Javier Barroso wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Memnon Anon > > With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, > > I hope this will change ;). > > Nobody mentioned snapshot explicitely, yet, if I am not totally > > mistaken, but equipment for DSA is on the li

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

2009-09-14 Thread Javier Barroso
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Memnon Anon wrote: > Javier Barroso writes: >> I think all is like in May [1], debian is searching a sponsor ... > > Thats the kind of answer I expected. > With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, > I hope this will change ;). > Nobody mentioned snapshot e

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

2009-09-14 Thread Memnon Anon
Javier Barroso writes: > I think all is like in May [1], debian is searching a sponsor ... Thats the kind of answer I expected. With the whole 'Debian Money' Thread on Project, I hope this will change ;). Nobody mentioned snapshot explicitely, yet, if I am not totally mistaken, but equipment fo

Re: Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

2009-09-14 Thread Javier Barroso
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Memnon Anon wrote: > Hi! > > Has anyone some information on the progress of making snapshot an > "official" debian service? > > I always found it an incredibly usefull service. > The last official announcements[1] I found > are pretty old. Last information was "(ET

Status of snapshot.debian.net|org ?

2009-09-14 Thread Memnon Anon
Hi! Has anyone some information on the progress of making snapshot an "official" debian service? I always found it an incredibly usefull service. The last official announcements[1] I found are pretty old. Last information was "(ETA: some months)". Obviously, Ganneff is still working on this[2],

snapshot.debian.net lost packages again?

2008-07-11 Thread T o n g
Hi, On http://snapshot.debian.net/ it says Debian packages daily archived since 2005/03/13, but I can't access any packages older than this year (2008): The requested URL /archive/2007/ was not found on this server Same for every year older than this year. Moreover, it hasn't be

problem with snapshot.debian.net: solved

2006-01-12 Thread Gerardo Ballabio
On 01/10/2006 04:14:34 PM, Gerardo Ballabio wrote: I tried to get it from snapshot.debian.net, but while it says packages since 2005/03/13 are available, I couldn't access packages earlier than 2005/11/01, and couldn't grab versions earlier than 1.8.4-2 (current

problem with snapshot.debian.net

2006-01-10 Thread Gerardo Ballabio
Hi all, I need to retrieve an older version of a package from unstable, which is not in sarge (plib1.8.4-dev_1.8.4-1_i386.deb). I tried to get it from snapshot.debian.net, but while it says packages since 2005/03/13 are available, I couldn't access packages earlier than 2005/11/01

Re: snapshot.debian.net

2003-09-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:17:51PM -0700, Tom wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:11:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:27:13PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Does http://snapshot.debian.net really keep EVERY version of EVERY > &g

Re: snapshot.debian.net

2003-09-27 Thread Tom
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:11:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:27:13PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Does http://snapshot.debian.net really keep EVERY version of EVERY package in > > unstable? > > See the statement on its front page. It

Re: snapshot.debian.net

2003-09-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:27:13PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does http://snapshot.debian.net really keep EVERY version of EVERY package in > unstable? See the statement on its front page. It's true. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To

snapshot.debian.net

2003-09-26 Thread tb . nospam
Does http://snapshot.debian.net really keep EVERY version of EVERY package in unstable? I've been doing this myself; on the rare instances when something blows up it's been great; but if anything is missing, Murphy's law comes into play... -Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [