Re: smbfs, smbfsx, smbclient

1999-06-21 Thread Brad
On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Kent West wrote: > Brad wrote: > > > > On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Kent West wrote: > > > > > 4) Will the smbmount (or smbmount-2.2.x) command work over a dial-up > > > connection? The dial-up connection is provided by my university, and > > > that's where the server is located. M

Re: smbfs, smbfsx, smbclient

1999-06-21 Thread Kent West
just stops responding. I can close it and open another one and go on with life. (BTW, I'm having to "umount /NetShare" after each attempt or on the next try I get an error message.) I tried it again after installing smbclient, but it does the same thing. smbclient seems to work jus

Re: smbfs, smbfsx, smbclient

1999-06-21 Thread Brad
questions are these: > 1) Do I need both the smbfs and the smbfsx packages? Or just one or the > other? DOes it hurt to have both installed? Just smbfsx. i don't know if it will cause problems or not having both installed. > 2) Where can I find the smbclient so that I can do some

smbfs, smbfsx, smbclient

1999-06-21 Thread Kent West
here's been some syntax change between smbfs and smbfsx, but the man page apparently doesn't match reality (the man says "smbmount" but the program I find on my system is "smbmount-2.2.x", etc), so I don't know whether my problems are because I'm following ou

Re: smbfsx for slink

1999-05-23 Thread Brad
On Sun, 23 May 1999, Rune Linding Raun wrote: > you have ofcourse defindes buskiller in /etc/lmhost file rite? That's not necessary, actually. If nmblookup can find buskiller, the command was fine (except for these troubles with the apostrophy). Otherwise, the -I option can be used to specify the

Re: smbfsx for slink

1999-05-23 Thread Rune Linding Raun
you have ofcourse defindes buskiller in /etc/lmhost file rite? On 23-May-99 Brad wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 1999, Paul Harris wrote: > >> i run kernel 2.2.6, so i have to use smbfsx, to mount service: >> >> //buskiller/wal's world/ i run: >> >> smbmount-2.1

Re: smbfsx for slink

1999-05-23 Thread Paul Harris
> > i tried smbmount-2.1.x "//buskiller/wal\'s world" jason -c 'mount bus' > > but then it says "wrong sharename", i tried all combinations and i either > > get one message or the other... > > Did you try it with single quotes? When i tested something before with > smbclient instead of smbmount-2

Re: smbfsx for slink

1999-05-23 Thread Brad
On Sun, 23 May 1999, Paul Harris wrote: > > i tried smbmount-2.1.x "//buskiller/wal\'s world" jason -c 'mount bus' > but then it says "wrong sharename", i tried all combinations and i either > get one message or the other... Did you try it with single quotes? When i tested something before with

Re: smbfsx for slink

1999-05-23 Thread Paul Harris
On Sat, 22 May 1999, Brad wrote: > > i run kernel 2.2.6, so i have to use smbfsx, to mount service: > > > > //buskiller/wal's world/ i run: > > > > smbmount-2.1.x "buskiller\\wal's world" jason -c 'mount bus' > > Have yo

Re: smbfsx for slink

1999-05-23 Thread Brad
On Sun, 23 May 1999, Paul Harris wrote: > i run kernel 2.2.6, so i have to use smbfsx, to mount service: > > //buskiller/wal's world/ i run: > > smbmount-2.1.x "buskiller\\wal's world" jason -c 'mount bus' Have you tried escaping the apostroph

smbfsx for slink

1999-05-23 Thread Paul Harris
hi, i'm wondering if others have this problem: i run kernel 2.2.6, so i have to use smbfsx, to mount service: //buskiller/wal's world/ i run: smbmount-2.1.x "buskiller\\wal's world" jason -c 'mount bus' and it tells me: Added interface.. Got

Re: problems with smbfsx and acct (potato)

1999-05-21 Thread Brad
On Fri, 21 May 1999, David Gaudine wrote: > Where is smbmount for the 2.2 kernel? It seems to be present in smbfs but > not in smbfsx which is the version intended for the latest kernels. But, > when I searched for smbmount / unstable using the web site, I got It's called &

problems with smbfsx and acct (potato)

1999-05-21 Thread David Gaudine
I just upgraded from slink to potato. This seemed like the best way to get support for my video card which has the "Rage 2 C" chipset. That works, but the upgrade affected a few other things, including; Where is smbmount for the 2.2 kernel? It seems to be present in smbfs but not

Re: smbfsx

1999-02-19 Thread Eloy A. Paris
Hi, Please upgrade to smbfsx-2.0.2-2 which has this problem fixed as well as some very internal and nasty problems that existed in smbfsx-2.0.1 and before. peloy.- Matthew Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to mount a samba server via the follow command > > bash-

Re: smbfsx

1999-02-19 Thread Brant Wells
>Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 20:11:42 -0500 >From: Matthew Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: debian >Subject: smbfsx > >I am trying to mount a samba server via the follow command > >bash-2.01$ smbmount-2.1.x //host/share -c 'mount /directory -u 123 -g >456&#x

smbfsx

1999-02-19 Thread Matthew Cocker
I am trying to mount a samba server via the follow command bash-2.01$ smbmount-2.1.x //host/share -c 'mount /directory -u 123 -g 456' I get the following out put Added interface ip=xxx.xxx.xx.x bcast=xxx.xxx.xx.xxx nmask=xxx.xxx.xxx.0 Server time is Thu Feb 18 20:07:00 1999 Timezone is UTC-5.0