Re: smartctl trackrecord

2007-01-31 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:19:18AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Hi, Anyone using 'smartctl -t long ... ' actually ever encountered errors *before* they showed up in the logs as seek errors? If so what did you do? I thought I'd be smart (so to speak) and do a -t

Re: smartctl trackrecord

2007-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > I thought I'd be smart (so to speak) and do a -t long just to see. One > drive does fine with no problems, the other drive won't complete. It > reports "aborted by host" with 90% remaining. Run it in single user mode, without *anything* that coul

Re: smartctl trackrecord

2007-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Anyone using 'smartctl -t long ... ' actually ever encountered errors > *before* they showed up in the logs as seek errors? Yes. > If so what did you do? Pulled out the disk from the RAID array, zeroed it, run a new extended offline test on it, whic

Re: smartctl trackrecord

2007-01-31 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:19:18AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone using 'smartctl -t long ... ' actually ever encountered errors > *before* they showed up in the logs as seek errors? > > If so what did you do? > I thought I'd be smart (so to speak) and do a -t long just to see.

smartctl trackrecord

2007-01-31 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Hi, Anyone using 'smartctl -t long ... ' actually ever encountered errors *before* they showed up in the logs as seek errors? If so what did you do? Hugo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]