On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:30:34 -0400, Stephen wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:20:43PM -0600 or thereabouts, Joseph Smidt wrote:
>> There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle
>> package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it i
>> There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle
>> package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it is
>> true, will there be a future switch from APT to this SMART? Could it be a
>> potential etch +1 goal? Just wondering
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:20:43PM -0600 or thereabouts, Joseph Smidt wrote:
> There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle
> package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it is
> true, will there be a future switch from APT to this SMART?
There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it is true, will there be a future switch from APT to this SMART? Could it be a potential etch +1 goal? Just wondering
4 matches
Mail list logo