Re: smail 3.1.29.1-22 append_header="..." problem

1996-05-02 Thread Raul Miller
Martin Alonso Soto Jacome: > > Speaking of junk e-mail, I did some more work on my junkmail > > daemon today. junkmail is an autoresponder I wrote to "deal with" > > the ever-increasing amount of unsolicited commercial email I > > receive every day. Instead of getting angry and writing a very

Re: smail 3.1.29.1-22 append_header="..." problem

1996-05-02 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, 1 May 1996, Gerry Jensen wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 1996, Scott Barker wrote: > > > Lars Wirzenius said: > > > > > Don't do that. Mail bombing is worse than junk mail. > > > > But it's not a bomb. You're just helping the spammer along by > > showing him a bunch of examples of other people's

Re: smail 3.1.29.1-22 append_header="..." problem

1996-05-02 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, 1 May 1996, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Scott Barker: > > You might want to consider saving some of the junkmail (perhaps > > a database holding about 5Meg worth of junkmail), and send each > > spammer a copy of each o f those junk mails, just so they know > > how it feels :) Preface each one

Re: smail 3.1.29.1-22 append_header="..." problem

1996-05-01 Thread Scott Barker
Gerry Jensen said: > What if the spammer faked his email address. You could be bombing a > innocent person. Ah! True enough. Guess it's best to just fire off a single warning to the supposed offender, their postmaster, and the postmaster of their upstream site (if applicable). -- Scott Barker

Re: smail 3.1.29.1-22 append_header="..." problem

1996-05-01 Thread Gerry Jensen
On Wed, 1 May 1996, Scott Barker wrote: > Lars Wirzenius said: > > Don't do that. Mail bombing is worse than junk mail. > > But it's not a bomb. You're just helping the spammer along by showing him a > bunch of examples of other people's junk mail :) You're providing them a > service, and should

Re: smail 3.1.29.1-22 append_header="..." problem

1996-05-01 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Scott Barker: > But it's not a bomb. You're just helping the spammer along by showing him a > bunch of examples of other people's junk mail :) You're providing them a > service, and should charge for it :) I see the smileys, but I still disagree. There are people who don't talk about mail bombs (

Re: smail 3.1.29.1-22 append_header="..." problem

1996-05-01 Thread Scott Barker
Lars Wirzenius said: > Don't do that. Mail bombing is worse than junk mail. But it's not a bomb. You're just helping the spammer along by showing him a bunch of examples of other people's junk mail :) You're providing them a service, and should charge for it :) -- Scott Barker Linux Consultant

Re: smail 3.1.29.1-22 append_header="..." problem

1996-05-01 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Scott Barker: > You might want to consider saving some of the junkmail (perhaps a database > holding about 5Meg worth of junkmail), and send each spammer a copy of each o > f > those junk mails, just so they know how it feels :) Preface each one with > "Gee, your junk mail was really boring. Perhap