On 09.11.2022 05:37, Amn wrote:
I have found impossible to use Bluetooth with my Debian 11 on my :
System Manufacturer Acer
System Model Aspire E5-771G
System Type x64-based PC
System SKU Aspire E5-771G_0880_1_09
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz, 2401 Mhz, 2
Core
I have found impossible to use Bluetooth with my Debian 11 on my :
System Manufacturer Acer
System Model Aspire E5-771G
System Type x64-based PC
System SKU Aspire E5-771G_0880_1_09
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz, 2401 Mhz, 2
Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)
BIOS
Pol Hallen a écrit :
>
> hello and thanks for your reply, I've changed from 1500 to 1492 (both
> interfaces) but I've same problem :-/
Have you tried to change the MTU on the client ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Yes, it can. Since you are using dsl, I suppose you are using it through PPPoE,
so here is your problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-to-point_protocol_over_Ethernet#MTU.2FMRU
I had the same problems (but on OpenBSD router). On Debian it can be
circumvented by using pppoeconf. It is by def
I had that problem with HTPS sites, and moves MTU 1492... it worked.
you might also check your DNS servers, you might add openDNS servers..
hello and thanks for your reply, I've changed from 1500 to 1492 (both
interfaces) but I've same problem :-/
I don't use pppoeconf, I'm in dmz by router
What about slow servers, routing to some servers passing though slow branches?
Heavy pages with a lot of preloaded resources and again a server not up to the
task?
--
Gian Uberto Lauri
Messaggio inviato da un tablet
> On 04/gen/2014, at 13:39, Pol Hallen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've a pc that
Hi all,
I've a pc that I use like a gateway (debian 7), the clients connected,
has strange problems:
the loading of web pages are ok but sometimes (only on some sites) the
loading of web pages is very slow... half page loaded and I see the
wheel rotating... sometimes webpage is loaded but I
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:56:28PM -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
> On Mar 27, 5:50 pm, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dave Stephenson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> >
>
> >
> > Did you do /etc/init/d/networking force-reload
> > after adding this to th interfaces file?
>
> "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 27, 4:00 pm, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I feel like I am missing something obvious.
> > >
> > > Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept
>
On Mar 27, 5:50 pm, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Stephenson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>
>
> Did you do /etc/init/d/networking force-reload
> after adding this to th interfaces file?
>
>
no, I just rebooted
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Stephenson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I feel like I am missing something obvious.
>
> here is my interfaces file:
>
>
> # The loopback network interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> # The primary network interface
> #allow-hotplug eth0
> #iface eth0 inet dhcp
"Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 27, 4:00 pm, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I feel like I am missing something obvious.
> >
> > Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept
> > variables? M
On Mar 27, 4:00 pm, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I feel like I am missing something obvious.
>
> Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept
> variables? Maybe $IFACE was meant to be replaced by the relevant
> int
"Dave Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel like I am missing something obvious.
>
Maybe a 'post-up' is more useful here. And does interfaces accept
variables? Maybe $IFACE was meant to be replaced by the relevant
interface name.
HTH,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don
I feel like I am missing something obvious.
here is my interfaces file:
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
# The primary network interface
#allow-hotplug eth0
#iface eth0 inet dhcp
auto eth0
#force higher speed in spite of signal peak & dhcp
#mtu 1500
iface eth
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 12:43 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> MTU 1500 does indeed fix the speed problem, but I can't make it stick.
> When i reboot I get MTU 576 again. I presume DHCP is setting this
> somehow.
> I have searched around and have tried to put MTU in /etc/network/
>
Hello again,
MTU 1500 does indeed fix the speed problem, but I can't make it stick.
When i reboot I get MTU 576 again. I presume DHCP is setting this
somehow.
I have searched around and have tried to put MTU in /etc/network/
interfaces without success.
I have not been able to find an example clea
On Mar 25, 2:40 pm, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 22:17:35 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:24:25 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > > The network interface is integrated into the Asus M2N-e motherboard
>
> > > from lspci
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:35:11PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 22:17:35 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:24:25 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > The network interface is integrated into the Asus M2N-e motherboard
> > >
> >
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 22:17:35 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:24:25 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > The network interface is integrated into the Asus M2N-e motherboard
> >
> > from lspci:
> > 00:08.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP55 Ethernet (rev a2)
>
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:24:25 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
[...]
> The network interface is integrated into the Asus M2N-e motherboard
>
> from lspci:
> 00:08.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP55 Ethernet (rev a2)
>
> from ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:18:F3:86:8C:92
>
On Mar 24, 6:20 pm, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should probably start with your network card. You will get a list of
> your (PCI) hardware if you run the command "lspci" (without quotes) from
> a terminal or a console. Please do this and copy the line(s) which
> are related to n
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:11:18 -0700, Dave Stephenson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been running a current version of Etch for a few months. My
> internet download speeds are in the range of 10 - 15 kB/s. Until
> recently I blamed it on my ISP, SignalPeak, which has been having
> troubles, Rece
I have been having all sorts of problems lately in setting up a new box
with an AMD64 and Etch. BUT . slow speed networking aint one of
them in fact I was surprised at how fast it was compared with the
old workhorse machine it will eventually replace.
So ... sorry... but it looks as i
Hi all,
I have been running a current version of Etch for a few months. My
internet download speeds are in the range of 10 - 15 kB/s. Until
recently I blamed it on my ISP, SignalPeak, which has been having
troubles, Recently I noticed that the Windoz boxes on the same router
are getting speeds
On Thursday 01 Jan 2004 8:04 pm, Johann Koenig wrote:
> Isn't that what apt-zip is for?
WOW.. this sounds great...
I'm going to try this out today and see how it works. Thank you everyone for
responding. I love Debian / GNU and the entire open source community.
;-)
Regards
Rishi
--
To UNS
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 09:34:51 -0500, Johann Koenig wrote:
>
> Isn't that what apt-zip is for?
>
I wasn't aware of apt-zip.
--
paul
Programming without a hex editor is like watchmaking without a hammer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Thursday January 1 at 09:03am
Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 08:35:24 -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> You could simply copy the .debs which you want from one of the
> >mirrors,> put them on a CD, take it home and copy the .debs off the
> >CD into>
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 08:35:24 -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> You could simply copy the .debs which you want from one of the mirrors,
>> put them on a CD, take it home and copy the .debs off the CD into
>> /var/cache/apt/archives on your PC and do the dist-upgrade. You don't
>> have to get
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 07:38:48AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:02:57 +0530, Rishi Gangoly wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I use Knoppix 3.2 at home.
> > I have an extreemly slow dial up connection to the NET from here.
> > However, the speed in my office is super fast.
> >
> > One
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:02:57 +0530, Rishi Gangoly wrote:
> Hi
>
> I use Knoppix 3.2 at home.
> I have an extreemly slow dial up connection to the NET from here.
> However, the speed in my office is super fast.
>
> One option to do a dist-upgrade would be to take the computer to the office
> and
On Thursday 01 January 2004 06:32, Rishi Gangoly wrote:
> Hi
>
> I use Knoppix 3.2 at home.
> I have an extreemly slow dial up connection to the NET from here.
> However, the speed in my office is super fast.
>
> One option to do a dist-upgrade would be to take the computer to the office
> and do i
Hi
I use Knoppix 3.2 at home.
I have an extreemly slow dial up connection to the NET from here.
However, the speed in my office is super fast.
One option to do a dist-upgrade would be to take the computer to the office
and do it over the week-end, but I was wondering if there was an alternative
33 matches
Mail list logo
