Re: slink install and libc6

1999-02-13 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/13/99 2:22:59 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I don't know what I'm talking about, but I was under the impression that > dpkg thinks that 2.0.7t is newer than 2.0.7.19981211-1, even though the > other way 'round is right. Or at least I have a vague memo

Re: slink install and libc6

1999-02-13 Thread Jiri Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I'm still at a loss as to why this is giving me problems in the first > place. From all I've read and ran across, 2.0.7t is less than > 2.0.7.19981211-1. Why is dpkg having such a problem with this file? I don't know what I'm talking about, but I was under the impression tha

Re: slink install and libc6

1999-02-10 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/10/99 10:58:23 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > First off, let me apologize if I misunderstood you. I'm in digest mode, and > so I can't see mail threads. I didn't see the posts that started this > thread. Your message sounded like you were experiencing

Re: slink install and libc6

1999-02-10 Thread Morgan Fletcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Thanks a bunch for the reply - but not sure if I understood you. I > downloaded the libc6 package from slink - it gave me version > 2.0.7.981211-2. The version in hamm is 2.0.7t. Are you saying I should > use the hamm version instead of the slink version? First off,

Re: slink install and libc6

1999-02-10 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/9/99 9:17:48 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > This may not work for you so try at your own risk :) > I used dselect, told it to update from the "frozen" directory and it > basically went and got all of slink and installed it on my drive. > I rebooted an

Re: slink install and libc6

1999-02-10 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/9/99 7:00:45 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Hey guys, I really need some help solving this.. Should I back out > > libc6.2.0.7.19981211-2 and reinstall libc6.2.0.7t-1? Or is there a way > > to use the new version of libc6 but get rid of the errors?

Re: slink install and libc6

1999-02-10 Thread Dimitri Patakidis
r processing libc6-dev (--install): >> > dependency problems -leaving unconfigured. >> > >> >> I'm having this same fit. What's the proper way to correct it? > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL P

Re: slink install and libc6

1999-02-10 Thread Morgan Fletcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hey guys, I really need some help solving this.. Should I back out > libc6.2.0.7.19981211-2 and reinstall libc6.2.0.7t-1? Or is there a way > to use the new version of libc6 but get rid of the errors? I have > several packages on hold pending resolution of this. I ha

slink install and libc6

1999-02-09 Thread MallarJ
Hey guys, I really need some help solving this.. Should I back out libc6.2.0.7.19981211-2 and reinstall libc6.2.0.7t-1? Or is there a way to use the new version of libc6 but get rid of the errors? I have several packages on hold pending resolution of this. > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent

slink install and libc6

1999-02-08 Thread MallarJ
In a message dated 2/8/99 2:36:16 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration > of libc6-dev: libc6-dev depends on libc6 (=2.0.7t-1) > ; however: Version of libc6 on system is > 2.0.7.19981211-2. > > dpkg: error processing libc6-dev (