On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:16:17AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 04 aug 14, 14:58:15, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> > I'm still not sure why it isn't in testing at
> > the moment,
>
> http://tracker.debian.org/encfs and click on the question mark next to
>
> The package has not entered testi
On Lu, 04 aug 14, 14:58:15, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> I'm still not sure why it isn't in testing at
> the moment,
http://tracker.debian.org/encfs and click on the question mark next to
The package has not entered testing even though the delay is over
The rest should be self-explanatory.
> but
B writes:
> On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:10:10 -0600
> Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Do you have more information on encfs being declared a security
>> hazard? Your post is the first I've heard of it.
>
> http://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
> (You'll note that dangerous attack vectors are quite low).
Ah
Mike Kupfer writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
>> declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
>> least in jessie repos.
>>
>> What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
>> to us
On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 04:08:15 +1000
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> All good points, trouble I see is that even /good/ teams can become
> violated by someone ... NSA working with NIST is one example;
This is why an international team is important, with
redundant checks and controls.
> I'm
> not going
On 4/08/2014 1:16 AM, B wrote:
> The question raise the underlying problems:
> * Should we pay for good crypto (and very good cryptanalysis)?
> I think YES (stop yelling, think crowfunding;), because
> good crypto skills are rare and thus expensive;
> furthermore, we need stable
On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 10:43:18 -0400
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Gack,,, I duplicated your posted URL before seeing your post
You will rot in a windows-only hell for that!
(without a debugger) *<;-p)
The question raise the underlying problems:
* Is crypto a specialist affair?
YES it is, indeed.
*
B writes:
> On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:10:10 -0600
> Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Do you have more information on encfs being declared a security
>> hazard? Your post is the first I've heard of it.
>
> http://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
> (You'll note that dangerous attack vectors are quite low).
Ga
Joe Pfeiffer writes:
>> Harry Putnam wrote:
>>
>>> I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
>>> declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
>>> least in jessie repos.
>>>
>>> What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:10:10 -0600
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Do you have more information on encfs being declared a security
> hazard? Your post is the first I've heard of it.
http://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm
(You'll note that dangerous attack vectors are quite low).
--
Nico : my little brother wa
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
>> declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
>> least in jessie repos.
>>
>> What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
>> to use and encfs was.
Do y
Harry Putnam wrote:
> I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
> declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
> least in jessie repos.
>
> What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
> to use and encfs was.
I've been usi
I guess encfs and its companion on windows of truecrypt have been
declared serious security hazards... encfs is not even available .. at
least in jessie repos.
What are people using as a replacement? Hopefully something as easy
to use and encfs was.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
13 matches
Mail list logo
