On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:48:18 +0400, wlan wrote in message
:
> 2012/3/30 Russell L. Harris
>
> > * Russell L. Harris [120324 07:15]:
> > > >From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three
> > > >machines) for
> > > a home or home office...
> > ...
> > > Is there a good firewall applic
I think netfilter are better firewall, you can read documentation from
iptables. It's really cool. =)
2012/3/30 Russell L. Harris
> * Russell L. Harris [120324 07:15]:
> > >From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines) for
> > a home or home office...
> ...
> > Is there a g
* Russell L. Harris [120324 07:15]:
> >From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines) for
> a home or home office...
...
> Is there a good firewall application in Debian which provides a secure
> default configuration? Or must I learn how to configure a firewall?
I thank all
On 2012-03-24, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
> You won't get a 'stealth' rating at grc. Shorewall seems to leave port 0
That's all hooey anyway, that "stealth" business, as if you're some kind
of combat aircraft over an Iranian nuclear installation or something,
prospect which must be attractive to th
On Sb, 24 mar 12, 11:16:08, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
> You won't get a 'stealth' rating at grc. Shorewall seems to leave port 0
> visible but closed. I don't know why this is but would be interested to know
> if someone on this list knew the reason.
Port 0? I haven't used Shorewall in a while, bu
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:17:50 +
Chris Davies wrote:
> Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines)
> > for a home or home office, how effective is a firmware-based
> > firewall/router in comparison with a software-based stand-alone
> > firewa
On Saturday 24 Mar 2012 16:16:08 Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
> You won't get a 'stealth' rating at grc. Shorewall seems to leave port 0
> visible but closed. I don't know why this is but would be interested to
> know if someone on this list knew the reason.
>
> What is the deal with port 0?
I have
>Is there a good firewall application in Debian which provides a secure
>default configuration? Or must I learn how to configure a firewall?
The package: 'arno-iptables-firewall' will do that. You will have to tell it
how you're connecting (e.g. eth0) but after that it will configure a
'default'
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines)
> for a home or home office, how effective is a firmware-based
> firewall/router in comparison with a software-based stand-alone
> firewall/router? Is either significantly better than the other?
Firmwar
Russell L. Harris wrote at 2012-03-24 02:02 -0500:
> Is there a good firewall application in Debian which provides a secure
> default configuration? Or must I learn how to configure a firewall?
Hopefully you are able to find something simple to use, but if you do learn
how to configure a firewal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I use UFW as firewall on all computers at home. It's very easy to
configure.
UFW (package ufw) can be found from Debian repositories. For
documentation see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UFW . There is
also graphical user interface called GUFW
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 07:02:42 +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines) for
> a home or home office, how effective is a firmware-based firewall/router
> in comparison with a software-based stand-alone firewall/router?
I'd say even the SP
>From the standpoint of protection of a LAN (two or three machines) for
a home or home office, how effective is a firmware-based
firewall/router in comparison with a software-based stand-alone
firewall/router? Is either significantly better than the other?
I am thinking in terms of devoting an ol
13 matches
Mail list logo
